Well we have a staking graph in the wallet in the main window which shows stake weight over time and most other wallets do NOT have this feature. Do you have the latest version?
It wasn't really clear to me if that was my weight in the graph or the network weight (as some clients tell that in the hover window). So, I'm guessing that is the individuals (users) coin weight? And thanks for working on adding some of these features !!! That's great! EDIT: I'm using version 1.5.3.1 and I still don't see "coin age" in the coin control window, like I said it lists date, but not how many days old for coin age - no big deal but it isn't there. |
|
|
|
Just go to settings -> options -> display (tab) -> display coin control I hope that answers your question. Coin age should be easily viewable in coin control. Personally I don't use these features as coins stake every 24 hours so it is not like you have to wait long and carefully make sure you don't reset coin age on some coins by mistake  I still don't see where it lists coin age in "coin control" window.. I see confirmations number.. and date.. I guess that's all there is for now?
If you would like staking weight more easier to be displayed I can ask PalmDetroit to include this in the next QT wallet release. We are constantly working on the next releases.
Yea, most wallets show staking information, like some of the previous example screenshots. Kind of surprised you guys haven't done this yet. Not trying to be a dick.. just sayin' |
|
|
|
Is there some way that I can see *my* coin's current staking weight(s) & age? I don't see anywhere where it shows.  Bump... |
|
|
|
Is there some way that I can see *my* coin's current staking weight(s) & age? I don't see anywhere where it shows. |
|
|
|
Apologies for the newbie-ish question but I understand that CLAM is a proof-of-stake coin with 1% annual inflation. That sounds similar to Peercoin which also has 1% annual inflation. I just found the following on the FAQ page: STAKE: we just staked 1.0000 CLAM - What does this mean?
Being a proof-of-stake coin means that just by holding coins the site earns rewards for staking blocks. All of the rewards earned are added to the site's bankroll, for players to play against and win. Just as each time a player loses against the site your invested amount goes up by the proportional amount, so it does when a stake is added. The amount your invested total changes on each win, loss or stake depends on the percentage of the site bankroll you hold. This earning will be subject to commission in the same way all gains are.
The rewards earned from staking do not show up in the site's overall profit, or in the site profit percentage but they do show up in each individual investor's profit stat. This allows us to compare the site's profit from players with the expectation. We expect the site profit to tend to 1% of the wagered amount over time. Is it correct that the staking rewards for CLAMs stored on Just-Dice are given to the investors or does dooglus get to keep these? I know proof-of-stake coins held on exchanges are staked by the exchange owners for extra profit on top of fees. So if the former is true (and I think the FAQ suggests that this is the case), the actual expected profit for a bunch of CLAMs invested in Just-Dice is 1% from staking + the losses of players from the house edge, correct? The inflation is far more than 1%/year. There are about 500 000 CLAM and 1 new CLAM created every minute + CLAM dugged out of non dust bitcoin addresses during the CLAM distribution on May 2013. Yeah that's a lot of jdcoin(clam) .. and just mainly for one site, and to *mostly* tied to that site. Too much risk for me, I think. |
|
|
|
Thanks for adding this new feature of weight in listcoin rpc call. I also appreciate it. Thanks also !! |
|
|
|
Is there any command that will list your coins and their weights in the console window?
I know how to see it in coin control.. I just want to know if there is a way in console too.
Thanks.
hmmm looks like the closest rpc call for what you want is cclistcoins I'll have to add weight to this rpc call. Oh, I didn't know it had to be added.., I was just wondering if a command already existed - was built in. But thanks for the info and help! |
|
|
|
Is there some timeframe on how long hyper coins have to age before they will start staking?
Are they based on age and gain "weight"?
Or will they start as soon as you get them in your wallet?
IN my experience a bit more than 24 hours...just let your wallet sync. I leave mine running unlocked. Should we be splitting into smaller amounts of coins to optimize staking, like how some other coins tell you to do? If so, what is optimal amount / size? |
|
|
|
|
Is there any command that will list your coins and their weights in the console window?
I know how to see it in coin control.. I just want to know if there is a way in console too.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Is there some timeframe on how long hyper coins have to age before they will start staking?
Are they based on age and gain "weight"?
Or will they start as soon as you get them in your wallet?
|
|
|
|
Bring back the lottery that used to be in clam (or a better variation of it).. that will more evenly distribute large amounts.
Say, like having multiple somewhat large jackpots.
Avoids all this other hassle of leverage and being tied so much to JD's site.
I personally didn't care for the lottery. I've been staking since July, and I never hit a lottery block. I have bad luck. At least now I can count on getting x% and not .x% Like I said, or make a better version / variation of it. Why have things so tied to JD? Especially when you're trying to get away from doing that. |
|
|
|
|
Bring back the lottery that used to be in clam (or a better variation of it).. that will more evenly distribute large amounts.
Say, like having multiple somewhat large jackpots.
Avoids all this other hassle of leverage and being tied so much to JD's site.
|
|
|
|
Random letter names are always dumb & I always wondered what uvwvj stood for. I think I figured it out.. uvwvj = ugly vagina wearing vulgar jockstrap !!  Take care ugly vagina |
|
|
|
|
Like torrenting, you can't kill crypto(coins). It will always be here in some form or another.
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer / exchange between many different coins, including some who may have died after you've done it.
Not sure if that is one of the options.. but may work.
|
|
|
|
Please add Clam. Thanks! 
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin's gotta succeed for anything else on that list to succeed.
can you explain why? If it can be shown that a solid cryptocurrency with 98% (nearly total) marketshare such as bitcoin, with it's corresponding network effect, can fail.. the idea that artificially scarce code can reliably store value will have been permanently shattered. So when the new king is crowned with 60% marketshare, people are not going to buy it, literally and figuratively. i see your point but i think you paint it a bit too black. After all bitcoin was no 'store of value' - if it would have been that, we would now not be in this miserable situation. You talk about 'artificial scarcity' but bitcoin was not and for a long time will not be 'scarce' - that's the main problem. Maybe not one but 3 or 4 kings are crowned? People have a choice and the best wins. Like a horse race. People will understand that and crypto will be treated for what it is: a risky investement in a new tech. One or two decades down the road things may be more manifested. I don't see a problem with abandoning bitcoin at all. Not abandoning it would cause a fail of the whole industry. Bitcoin can still hold a decent marketcap without being the primary coin. It's the free market and evolution - there's nothing wrong with that and it's authentic. Nothing will be shattered. Forcing a coin onto people that is nonsense from an economic and also from a darwinistic standpoint is BS. If bitcoin after this past years performance would remain number 1 all this industry would have lost credibility. We have learned a few lessons from it so it was good. Time to move on ... protip: Next time use a coin that doesn't dump all year long so the point with the 'artificial scarce code' can be made once again. It's an evolving, evolutionary process. Believing something else is madness. Nothing is set in stone. "Panta rhei" my friend. You would be surprised to hear all these 'permabulls' were selling all the time while telling you how bitcoin will be the big thing. Only trust your own judgement - never let yourself be influenced by what others say because they sell you all kinds of bullshit. Bitcoin-pumpers are no exception. I think we basically agree. I don't think bitcoin can fail as in go to zero for no good reason and be replaced by another big (billion dollar) cryptocurrency and so on in a cycle of total failure after succession after total failure. I think succession in cryptocurrency has to follow the example of empires in world hisgtory. The Roman empire can wane, and the Holy Roman Empire can replace it but Italian powers are still a thing. Still a force to be reckoned with. The British empire can wane and America rises but the United Kingdom is still a thing. It's still a force. As you said, you can have bitcoin wane and lose marketshare to some novel, useful technologies, but it'll still be considered a success if it survives and holds a decent marketcap. And that's what I mean. If bitcoin's not a success, nothing will be a success. Everything is flowing from the tradition of bitcoin. No, bitcoin can fail and something can rise up to replace it being more of a success. Look at other technologies, like search engines. Before google there was crappy stuff like altavista, yahoo and those are still around, but google rose up to be a success. Just because the earlier search engines more or less failed.. it didn't mean nothing else was going to come along. The market & majority of popularity/population decides, not you. |
|
|
|
|
Clams.. among a few other proof of stake coins..
Was a fair initial distribution model (if you had btc, ltc or doge back around May, odds are you have clams!),
has good control of inflation and becoming accepted at more places.
Go clams!
|
|
|
|
Ryan has great predictions, which are just that 'predictions'. This does not demonstrate certainty though. There is a phrase we use in security trading, 'past results do not guarantee future performance'. Even the best are not right 100% of the time; it comes with the territory.
You want to see his predictions.. its right here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=850057.msg10046010#msg10046010https://i.imgur.com/CKsJslo.pngNothing but pure manipulation, all his charts, babbling and "analysis" are nothing but BULLSHIT. The prices are all manipulated by him.. so of course he "predictions" are going to play out. And its why you are getting insulted by his cronies & alt accounts, they don't want it getting out that it all means nothing.All part of the marketing gimmick in order to get people to join and "believe" he is some great Zoltar fuck or whatever Come give great RyanFuckHumper your money !! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
