Or maybe it went to Mark's new house? Do you think a person who lost a bunch of people's investment could afford a new house?
How about someone who _stole_ a bunch of people's investment? Do you think that person could afford a new house?
Because Mark recently bought one, while you were waiting for your banx shares to sell.
I've been to that house. It's a rental. How do I know? I know the landlord. Well, thanks for the info. I was just going off of what he seemed to claim in his Periscope videos. So, you don't work for Mark, but you've been to his house, know his landlord, and you are seemingly running the Cryptomic Logo contest? Seems legit. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1400632.60Defending him all day in forums, running his logo contest for him, seems like a lot of work. I guess when you are the only sucker left, no job is too big when it comes to defending your investment? I love crypto. My own project has been running for a couple of years. Being "involved" and being able to influence direction is fun. Also helping someone who's back is against the wall takes courage, kicking someone when they're down takes cowardice. |
|
|
|
Please update wallets ASAP https://github.com/MonetaryUnit/MUE-Src/releases/tag/v1.0.10.8changelog: Add Purchase page for buying MUE without hasslesUpdate and use libsecp256k1 Prefer QT5 by default Static releases include openssl 1.0.1s and qt5.5.1 Checkpoint Blocks #1250000 and #1300000 Fixed constant high cpu usage with certain configs |
|
|
|
To everyone who has submitted a logo in this contest, please PM me your account login name for www.CrypTomic.comI WILL send everyone BANX for being involved, just give me some time as life is extremely busy as the moment! Thanks again  |
|
|
|
Thank you for being a part of the re-brand and re-launch of this exchange. |
|
|
|
bizzyb I'm afraid you have lost your money. Mark is clinging on but eventually he'll give up. Most likely he'll disappear into a depressive funk for a few months like the end of last year. It's a shame but that's how he is. He continues to make the same mistakes over and over. More worryingly he has been having thoughts about ending it all yet doesn't seem to be seeking professional help for it: http://marklyford.com/personal/maybe-the-world-would-be-better-off-without-meHe is receiving professional help, as well as support from friends and family. Speaking from experience, suicidal thoughts are very common when receiving medication for other mental health issues. Have you never thought about doing something "bad"? I know you have, but did you act on it? Mental health doesn't have to incapacitate someone and neither does it have to negate their inherent intelligence and ability, and only rarely does it do that. Half of the people you know either have, had, or will have mental health issues, and will still be "normal". Mark is not "clinging on", he is fighting, and he should be given a break to make things right, which is a massive part of his determination to continue. |
|
|
|
What exactly do you suggest....
I suggest you nail Marks bollocks to the mast, and demand to know what happened to every penny going through Banx.....you know, like all legit and viable companies are able to do. Where has the money gone? Multiple startups 2 years Fintech Crypto A perfect storm of huge risk vs huge reward, that's where the money went. Yep, i get that. You could sum up this brave new space, with the above references if you want. But Banx attempted to be a real company by registering itself with Companies House and therefore committed itself to certain practises and processes. Processes and practices that Mark knows, affords Banx a certain value in the eyes of observers/investors/potential investors/tax office etc. For some baffling reason, Mark took the approach that spin, fakery, taking a victim mentality, undermining investors, doxing people, colluding with third party exchanges, claiming Bitcoin messiah wisdom etc etc, is the way to move forward with a registered company. Its not, and never will be, while there are genuine company directors, investors/potential investors etc. who find value in said processes and practices. Banx is trying to have it both ways, and it will fail. It will fail because it doesnt even come close to conforming to recognised share-holding business norms, even taking into account this space - a la wildwest. It certainly wont fail because i or anyone else says so. Ultimately, it will fail cos the day of reckoning always comes, after spending time chasing made-up numbers. HMRC will see to that. Time will tell. I sincerely hope that will not be the case. I'm a good judge of character and quite confident things were done in "good faith". Have mistakes been made? Yes Have certain groups been alienated and not engaged with? Yes This thread is a symptom of that. Losses have been incurred by all involved, losses which do not have to be realised just yet, as there " may" be a second chance for investors. For that, and his determination in the face of adversity I respect Mark and will continue to support him how I can. Not least as it is in my interest to help turn things around. |
|
|
|
Payment to Web Summit organisers in return for Remittio award
What's your evidence for this? |
|
|
|
Or maybe it went to Mark's new house? Do you think a person who lost a bunch of people's investment could afford a new house?
How about someone who _stole_ a bunch of people's investment? Do you think that person could afford a new house?
Because Mark recently bought one, while you were waiting for your banx shares to sell.
I've been to that house. It's a rental. How do I know? I know the landlord. |
|
|
|
What exactly do you suggest....
I suggest you nail Marks bollocks to the mast, and demand to know what happened to every penny going through Banx.....you know, like all legit and viable companies are able to do. This shows your fundamental lack of understanding, experience and knowledge. Where has the money gone? Multiple startups 2 years Fintech Crypto A perfect storm of huge risk vs huge reward, that's where the money went. |
|
|
|
Do you understand that he has given his investors a "lifeline" because he wants to do the right thing?[/b]
You got it bad, bizzyb........ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockholm_syndromeThe "right thing" is to not fake data when you seek funds from others, and continue to fake the (his) order book volume for many months. The man is fake, and a fail, and you are a victim of that. Hey, at least you count as a 'real' friend on facebook, and not one of the thousands of fake ones. I mean, at least you havnt been bought...........oh! How many nervous ticks, or touches to the face, at certain moments in his videos, do you need to watch before people realise Marks underlying/true motives? Mark should have shut down Banx and walked away? On the day he decided that he needs to employ fake and bullshit marketing tactics to sell the idea of Banx.....yes, he should have immediately shut down Banx and walked away. That time would have been around 18 months ago. Tooooo late now. It's too late to try to do the right thing? He has had nearly 18months to do the right thing, and he nearly did the right thing by ending this farce. But no, as you can see from his last post, Mark is still in complete denial of his own capabilities, as he still believes there is a business to run. The man is not fit to run a bath. So he should shut it all down and us investors should be left with nothing? What exactly do you suggest, other than childish name calling, should be done other than provide us investors a part of all his other businesses? |
|
|
|
We're creating a short list, give is a few days to do that, and get opinion together to make a final decision.
Thanks
What happened to the free BANX for all entries? I've not done it yet. Have you PM'd your details? If so, I will get it done, just ideally need to be sat at my desktop to do it. |
|
|
|
Do you understand that he has given his investors a "lifeline" because he wants to do the right thing?[/b]
You got it bad, bizzyb........ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockholm_syndromeThe "right thing" is to not fake data when you seek funds from others, and continue to fake the (his) order book volume for many months. The man is fake, and a fail, and you are a victim of that. Hey, at least you count as a 'real' friend on facebook, and not one of the thousands of fake ones. I mean, at least you havnt been bought...........oh! How many nervous ticks, or touches to the face, at certain moments in his videos, do you need to watch before people realise Marks underlying/true motives? Mark should have shut down Banx and walked away? On the day he decided that he needs to employ fake and bullshit marketing tactics to sell the idea of Banx.....yes, he should have immediately shut down Banx and walked away. That time would have been around 18 months ago. Tooooo late now. It's too late to try to do the right thing? |
|
|
|
Do you understand that he has given his investors a "lifeline" because he wants to do the right thing?[/b]
You got it bad, bizzyb........ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockholm_syndromeThe "right thing" is to not fake data when you seek funds from others, and continue to fake the (his) order book volume for many months. The man is fake, and a fail, and you are a victim of that. Hey, at least you count as a 'real' friend on facebook, and not one of the thousands of fake ones. I mean, at least you havnt been bought...........oh! How many nervous ticks, or touches to the face, at certain moments in his videos, do you need to watch before people realise Marks underlying/true motives? Mark should have shut down Banx and walked away? |
|
|
|
Affected by the entire scheme which this page was a small part of? Yes.
Unconvincing, totally. I am a Banx investor and this page was to any reasonable person clearly a projections page. The project was in funding round. Like any other project before Banx, and any other project after Banx, when getting funding you provide projections. This page had no impact on me investing. In fact, this page didn't even exist when I invested. So, if your main concern is "investors" then stop vilifying the only person who can potentially drive profits to give us a return. Do you acknowledge that Mark could have closed Banx and walked away, but hasn't?
Do you understand that he has given his investors a "lifeline" because he wants to do the right thing?You are acting like a bully, and bullies usually have been bullied. So, why not stop the cycle that doesn't have to be the inevitable conclusion. |
|
|
|
All the people complaining about their investment evaporating into thin air were affected.
All the people complaining about their investment evaporating were affected by this ONE single page only accessible through Google cache. All of them? You have evidence to back that up? How many people? |
|
|
|
Damn dude, you figured me out. I thought I was smart enough to trick you, but I see now that there is no pulling the wool over your eyes.
When I showed you the Google cache, I was certain it would convince you, but since it didn't, I may as well come clean.
The truth is, I conspired with Larry Page of Google to destroy Mark. You see, Page knows that Banx is a threat to his business because once Mark makes a banx-powered search engine, it will be game over for Google.
So Larry and I, I call him Larry since we are such good friends, went into the Google Servers last night and messed with banx's cache. Then, I photoshoped a picture of the old site into an image of my screen to make it look like it was new!
Then, assured that mine and Larry's plan was bullet proof, I staked my professional reputation on the lie.
I had hoped you would come to the reasonable conclusion that Mark had lied, but I know now that you are far too smart for that.
I guess I'll go call Larry, tell him that it's been a good run but we all knew this "Google" thing wouldn't last.
See, purile  It's quite likely the root domain was forwarded but not any subdomains or pages, easy mistake to make actually and it's that sort of thing which would explain a few things. Point is this, which you have inelegantly avoided. Has anyone been affected by this? |
|
|
|
I didn't need the cache or archive.org yesterday. It was up as a normal page. The only reason we need to use it now is because Mark took it down. Google last cached the site on March 16th. That can't be faked and means the site was up then. Mark may have taken it down in January, but he clearly decided to put it back up while he transitioned into his next scheme.
There is still plenty of reason to question the data as something doesn't look right with it, like I said maybe something messed up with forwarding or DNS/cache, enough to at LEAST ask "hmmm what could be causing this, maybe I'll ask Mark for an official response before I write another hatchet piece of an article"...just sayin Either way, forget about obsessing about that & lets concentrate on the implications. IF someone invested based on that page WITHOUT realising they were projections then that would be an issue. Why? Because all private investors HAVE to speak to him to invest, and it would have to be made clear they are projections. So, I suggest you find out IF 1) The page in question convinced someone to invest thinking it was anything other than "projections" (Not that any "reasonable" person would) 2) If 1 occurred and then they invested privately and were NOT told they were projections. If both 1 & 2 have occurred, then you can carry on, if not, just leave it alone. For me your purile "graphics" headers for each of your articles, in particular your latest article, speaks a thousand words wrt your bias. |
|
|
|
Google Banxshares.com click the arrow to bring up cache.
If he truly isn't your boss, I suggest you file a claim with the relevant authorities.
Good luck.
Well I think something is screwed up with the Google Cache because I can't do a search on google and get any results for http://banxcapital.com/investors/https://www.google.co.uk/?gws_rd=ssl#q=http:%2F%2Fbanxcapital.com%2Finvestors%2FWhile yes, your link does appear to show some content, the fonts and menu look messed up for some reason. I don't "know" what the issue is, but I think it is some kind of DNS/Cache error or another kind of "technical" glitch. You seemed to have massively latched onto this "evidence" without due diligence and equally there is contradictory evidence showing you that there were no projections listed on the site as far back as the 9th Jan 2016 web archive. http://web.archive.org/web/20160109123320/http://banxshares.com/That should be enough for a serious journalist to question the reliability of a single source of information. I think given your article is dated today, and your "evidence" regarding the "projections" is clearly not present as of "today" it would only be reasonable and balanced, to edit/amend/delete your article appropriately and citing there is contradictory evidence. That is what a serious, reasonable balanced journalist would do. ps None of us are happy our investments have crashed, but Mark is acting in good faith to try to make things right for us. That is his moral choice, and not his legal obligation. Rather than wind up Banx and leave us with nothing, he is trying to give us the opportunities for a return with his other businesses. That sounds like the actions of a serious, reasonable and balanced person. |
|
|
|
I'm an investor trying to protect my investment & support the project, he's not my boss. Can you explain how you got that cached version, so I can try myself. |
|
|
|
I took them yesterday. I don't know or care if your website was displaying incorrectly. I took that screenshot yesterday while on your site. PERIOD.
Unedited screen I took YESTERDAY.
Strange then that web archive from 9th January 2016 shows Banxshares.com forwarding to Banxcapital.com AND the web archive from 9th January 2016 shows Banxcapital.com with NO "projections"http://web.archive.org/web/20160109123320/http://banxshares.com/I wonder how that could be explained? Any ideas? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
