I disagree. Axie was always destined to fail, why? Because they have a system where you can breed infinitely, meaning you will eventually have so many axies working towards making money that, it will not be profitable to keep making it, and that would cause the inflation of the SLP and AXS and cause it to go down. Even with spending some money to breed that Axie, eventually some people will do it, and the number of Axies would have gone to "too many" side and that is what has happened.

You cannot sustain such a thing and it would only be gone eventually. This is why we should never expect it to go on like this, we need to make sure that it never has the same issues again and axie would need to fix that mechanism in their game.

It's basically all about the nuclear war threat. I mean could EU and USA go into Ukraine and beat Russia out of there if we are talking about just the regular soldiers and tanks type of war? Of course they can, it would be simple like taking candy out of a child. Hell USA alone could, the USA airforce has the biggest air power in all of the world, you know who has the second highest? USA navy. They are that huge, and they have bigger military spending then like 20+ next biggest combined.

So, no matter whatever nationalistic bs anyone talks about, USA army (I am not even American and dislike USA government as well) would win against anyone, probably against all of Europe if it had to, let alone just Russia. But nuclear weapons? That threat is a very real one, and can destroy the earth very easily with a single button.

I believe that there is a big possibility you could buy a very good house even in the most expensive nations and cities for one bitcoin in the future. Like for example where the houses are expenses now? Toronto, New York, London, Paris? Those type of places? Well for 1 bitcoin, you would be able to get 1000+ square feet apartment/loft whatever there with like 3 rooms or maybe 2 big ones.

This is where it is headed, at one point it was possible to get like some "bad" houses for 1 bitcoin in places like Miami, and even right now it is possible to buy some houses in some nations, but not in leading nations. So in 10 years, it will get there for sure.

Drake is the most listened rapper/hiphop singer in the spotify, that should tell you something shouldn't it? I mean not only that there are a lot of fans of Drake all over the world, he is literally the most loved and listened person of his genre, but even if you do not personally like him and do not listen to his type of music, how many times in your life would you get to meet or at least talk with a person like that from the phone? Like literally 100+ million people listen to a person, and that person calls you, how frequently does that happen?

I personally met with a person who had 300k or so followers on instagram as an actor, he was a chill and good guy, but it was still super exciting, and that's 300k, this dude has 116 million.

I am not really against it; yeah, if we do absolutely nothing about Russia attacking Ukraine, then we should not do anything about it if they decide to invade Finland, how about Estonia after that? How about if they decide to invade Latvia, Lithuania, after that? I mean where does it end? When do you say "that's enough Russia"?

You gotta start somewhere and at the start is great. They already have a puppet in Belarus, and they are de facto ruling Georgia as well, but if you let Ukraine too, which is basically in Europe already, then you are in a big trouble. This is why I get that, Russia attacking a European nation was the last draw for them and they are putting their foot down. Doesn't sound too silly to me, totally what anyone would do.

Scamming is such an "easy" way of making money for some people. All you have to do is work hard to convince people to believe in you, and you can make a bulk amount of money together. Just think of companies that scam you. Think of an exchange, normally they make money from the trading fee, and if they just decide to take all the money in their accounts and leave? That would be gigantic compared to what trading fee profits would bring you.

This is why I believe that the best thing to do right now is not get scammed, but also understand why scammers do it. If you realize what the angle someone talks to you, then you will see if they are scammers or not.

I agree that it looks quite close to each other, but there has always been some people who were going with the flow of bitcoin at all times. Some people who see it go from 20k to 30k think it will go to 40k, but see it go from 30k to 20k think it will be 10k. They do not really comprehend the "it will eventually stop" mindset, which is weird because by that logic it would be either one million dollars or zero.

In the end, we are going to see the price stop going down, and we probably saw it already, it is doing alright right now. If we believe that and continue like that, we should be fine, there shouldn't be any problems at all. That is at least how I see it going.

I wouldn't call him "ancient". I mean Vettel is still a great and marvelous racer if you ask me but he has a bad car and he looks ancient now, Alonso could still get "some" but he is probably ancient too, but Lewis is just "bad" at this point with that car. Even Russel is racing better, which is a proof that Hamilton got a bit older, and the ease of having by far the best car ever, the most dominant car ever made, turned him into a softie who didn't had to work as hard as others. Now that the playing field is leveled, even worse than 2 cars, this made Hamilton worse. He is still in top 6 if you ask me, better than anyone aside from RBR and Ferrari cars and Russel.

I never truly understood players who already won so much to end up getting to the money trap. I mean Messi must be one of the richest sports figures of all time, and he still considers getting more money from PSG?

I believe he could play another year here, and when his contract is up, he could leave and play very cheap for Barcelona. Why not do that? Doesn't make sense to chase money even at his age. This dude probably made over a billion dollars total, even if half of that is gone, he must have something close to half a billion dollars, and probably spent it on silly stuff if he still needs money. I get that you may want money when you can make it, but after a certain point happiness sounds like more important than more money.

I wouldn't call wingers "midfield". Sure they are not strikers, but they are still in the offensive side of things and not midfield. Midfield is players like Xavi and Iniesta combo we know so well, not Messi and Neymar, those are wingers. They will also not be "getting rid of", I mean they could sell them, or transition them to something else, but getting rid of them sounds like they would be unwanted players who suck, they do not suck.

Getting younger players are usually for two things; one is the fact that these players can't play all games, so you need young players who can warm up very quickly and play instead. And two would be getting them ready to take the spot when older players age too much.

This is true and very real. I have met with quite a lot of people back in the day, and most of them went ahead and made their own projects later in life. When you have been in crypto for so many years like me, you meet with a lot of people who get rich, and when they get rich, they want to get richer and they build new projects.

I have seen all of them get audits, and at least half of them would have another token with a new contract after the audit to fix things, and maybe like 5-10% of them would get a third one to get even a better one. Sure,it is a bad situation for the project no doubt, but having a shitty contract and sticking with it would have been even worse.

I agree with this, I mean if we are selling 1 billion Chinese data for the very first time, you could even contact FBI or CIA or something and ask for a lot more, you could get rich. But if you already sold it like 100 times, then you could not ask that much, you just gotta drop the price a ton.

It is still 1 billion Chinese, so it is not going to be free or 100 bucks, but believe me as long as this exists eventually it will become free as well, you will see it shared everywhere eventually. My nation had a similar situation and now you can get it for free after 5 years. If this is real, the first one was probably expensive, now 10 btc, later it will be 1, and eventually free.

I believe that if they keep that relationship going, then it would make sense, but it is also a lot of money. I mean Barcelona certainly needs that money and if they can sell him then they could do a lot more, it would open up so much more for them. Every year (until the debt is paid) they will need to sell some players to make some cap for themselves and then they could do whatever they want after that, not unlimited of course but better.

This is why I understand why they want to get rid of him. But United shouldn't just take him because Erik wanted him, they should negotiate on the price a lot more down, De Jong looks like max 50 million type of player to me.

Well, if we look at the "gossip" of the year, we could say they may get Ben Yedder, De Jong, Eriksen, Martinez, Antony. These are HUGE HUGE names if they could get them. Okay maybe Eriksen is not that big anymore, but the rest are quite huge. Antony alone is a big enough name because many believe he is the best player in Ajaz right now, Martinez is a young great player, and De Jong is a star level player.

These three alone would be amazing and very good for their future, Ben Yedder is a bit on the older side but still great. I am not saying they will get all of these, but they are chasing these names and they are good names to chase, I hope they get lucky.

I can't even imagine discouraging people to buy now too, that would be very silly. Why not buy it when it is low, when you can sell it when it is high? That is literally how the trading deal works, it has always been said to be "buy low, sell high" and if you can't do that then you shouldn't be trading.

Everyone knows that you should be buying bitcoin and altcoins when they are low, sure if it is a shitcoin then sell and get out, but if it is a legit one, then you should buy it and then you should be selling it at a much higher level in the future. I know not many people do that, but they should totally consider doing it in the future to be able to understand how to make money.

Nobody really thought that Real Madrid would win, that was a very shocking result to everyone. First they faced PSG and everyone thought Mbappe would find a way to win, between Messi and Neymar he had some world class help, and somehow they still lost.

I mean that last goal maybe 10 seconds into the game, right after scoring, that back to back really killed the whole team in an instant. Then they faced Chelsea and still managed to make a comeback there as well, great game for sure. Then the magnificent City, they slot the first game there too, and then they were down until 88th minute of the game, seriously how are you down two games in, whole ass two games, and then turn things around in 2 minutes. Not gonna talk about Liverpool because that looked like they kind of did well enough to win there anyway without any worry.

I think there shouldn't be a maximum of challenges, I believe it should be based on VAR refs and that's it. Teams shouldn't challenge anything, if there is a big uproar, the VAR team checks the replay and if they see something then they will let the ref know and the ref will watch it, if they do not see anything wrong it will continue even if the other team still goes on to make noise.

If the whole power is in the refs, and not the players then there is no worry. Look at NBA, the challenge system has been put in place and yet it's not used much. Plus if a ref gives a wrong decision, more often than not they will keep the decision unless it is a hugely obvious result.

I have to say you could check the data on the previous ones so far, like probably for the past 5 years or so, and can find over 100 projects that was profitable, or at least over 10 bucks to follow up. However, that doesn't mean that it is a good idea, because we had 100's of them per month for the past 5 years and that is why the batting average is quite low.

If you have thousands, probably maybe like 10 thousand of them out there, and only 100 of them made you money, that is a low chance to win something. This is why not many people get super happy about it, you should be trying to avoid that as much as you could and instead find "sure" things to spend your time on.

I can understand that he may not be ready for coaching, or he is not a terrible player, ok, that's fine. But do you really think that he deserves to be the highest paying player in Milan? I mean is he the player that provides the most to the team? Maybe 10 years ago, but right now he is not a player that provides as much as possible, he is not the top contributor, even as a striker, he doesn't score that much anymore.

This is why I believe that, if Milan wants to keep him and if Ibrahimovic wants to play, then it's fine and I am not going to argue against that, but remember that he should be getting paid a lot less, like half of what he is getting paid, then it would make sense.

I feel like it is not about all-stars getting into the same team all together, it's the system building that decides it. If you have one superstar level PF that plays mostly inside, if you have one of the all time great players who likes to drive inside, and have a PG that usually goes inside as well, one of them being a great three point shooter, then it is quite obvious that you are going to clog the paint and it would be hard for you to be efficient and the inside would be crowded by other teams defense and would make it harder for you to score.

This is obvious, so even if you get amazing players, this method won't work. Hence, it's both about getting good players, but also having a good system in place for those players to have good roles that do not overlap each other.