http://techcrunch.com/2013/03/21/pocket-change-ios/Pocket Change says its mission is to “build the world’s first universal rewards currency,” but until now it has been limited to Android apps. Today, it’s announcing that it’s opening to iOS developers as well. The company was founded in 2011 and has raised $6.4 million from Google Ventures and others. Co-founder and CEO Ari Mir said that last year, Pocket Change switched its model from being a virtual currency that users have to pay for in apps, and instead became something that’s given to users as a reward for “positive, organic behavior,” say for achieving certain goals in a game. The currency can then be redeemed for both virtual and physical rewards. The switch turns around Pocket Change’s relationship with users, Mir said: “You cannot build a successful universal currency if you have a negative relationship with the consumer.” The company offers the currency for free to developers, and it makes money by including sponsored rewards, turning Pocket Change into an ad company. (The sponsorship part of the business is only a few weeks old.) There’s no revenue sharing with the developers, who benefit instead by increasing user engagement — Mir said that for some apps, Pocket Change has increased the number of sessions per user by more than 20 percent in a month. The virtual currency is now used in 500 applications and reaches 3 million users per day. Mir said that about 20 to 30 percent of those millions actually convert to become Pocket Change users. As for why it stuck with Android until now, Mir said, “It’s actually really simple. We’re obsessed with building a good consumer Internet experience, so we need to iterate with the product really fast. As an SDK provider, there’s already that lag time.” Adding in the Apple approval process would only make the delay worse. Now, however, Mir said he’s comfortable with the product and is ready to go cross-platform. He said this was a big demand from existing Pocket Change developers, but he’s also hoping to reach a new group of apps. Other startups make a similar pitch to developers include Kiip and SessionM. Mir argued that Pocket Change is different from the competition because of the direct relationship it builds with consumers, and because of its emphasis on a non-interruptive experience. He also has an ambitious vision for the company, where Pocket Change could eventually be used to make other purchases on the web, such as getting around a newspaper paywall, and to make purchases in physical stores. http://techcrunch.com/2013/03/21/pocket-change-ios/
|
|
|
Unless your trying to blow me as a scammer?
It's "you're" and I'm definitely not trying to blow you. Yes I'm dyslexic and hard of hearing so have language problems that even spell-checkers don't pick up. This is the RSM thread, either pm me or start a new thread and link me. I've been on these forums over eighteen months and will reply. To be true yes I'm also angry with Tom as I sweated my back out on CoinConnect for F-All and he won't even speak to me. I've got his assistant Dave Carlson on my Gtalk if that helps and his hosting idea was actually mine. To beat Josh@BFL as he also wouldn't answer emails or offer us P2Pool and/or merged-mining. Tho either pm me or start a new thread as this is just spam. I'm very close to most of the major investors in RSM and we are friends so they know plus can ask anything. I gave myself just over 3% of the initial share issue to run RSM and through my own investment I'm now the largest investor in this project with the most coins put in to loose. I'm not going to throw my coins away and am hoping to build RSM into me making a full time living. With the possible relocation to Iceland due to them having cheap 100% green renewable electricity plus good internet laws. Or New Zealand (where its much sunnier) as they also have geothermal electricity.
|
|
|
Unless your trying to blow me as a scammer?
It's "you're" and I'm definitely not trying to blow you. Yes I'm dyslexic and hard of hearing so have language problems that even spell-checkers don't pick up. This is the RSM thread, either pm me or start a new thread and link me. I've been on these forums over eighteen months and will reply. To be true yes I'm also angry with Tom as I sweated my back out on CoinConnect for F-All and he won't even speak to me. I've got his assistant Dave Carlson on my Gtalk if that helps and his hosting idea was actually mine. To beat Josh@BFL as he also wouldn't answer emails or offer us P2Pool and/or merged-mining. Tho either pm me or start a new thread as this is just spam. I'm very close to most of the major investors in RSM and we are friends so they know plus can ask anything.
|
|
|
matthewh3,
What was your relationship with Tom that allowed you to order his FPGAs before the product was announced? What are your thoughts on him not paying ASIC preorders back after ending the project?
Tom stopped answering my emails since he started bASIC also CoinConnect (what I put a lot of work into) has been offline the same amount of time. It was the fact I worked on CoinConnect and BFL-FPGA orders were taking so long that we went with Tom. There was a time we was thinking of switching to bASIC but after our FPGA delays and investor advice we stuck out with BFL like we should have from the very beginning as we'd have FPGA's mining now. Tho we did get full resale value for our FPGA's from Tom devices. Have a lot of people lost out? That doesn't answer either of my questions. My relationship with Tom was I worked on CoinConnect for him. He gave me a 10% stake to work on CoinConnect. He knew of my RSM project and promised to beat BFL's delivery time with a better device and we took his promise. Which didn't turn out true. By the time we got our FPGA's off Tom BFL announced their ASIC. So we sold our FPGA's some unboxed to guy in Germany for full value as he had no 20% VAT to pay. Can you either pm me or start a new thread unless this affects RSM future. Unless your trying to blow me as a scammer? If so just double check with Inaba AKA Josh@BFL that he has three SC-Singles paid for to be hosted by him and anyone can check our BTC10.00 Pyramining ASIC deposit. I've tried to contact Tom many times as he promised to hand over CoinConnect to me for all my work. Which he didn't so I helped start - http://bitcoinhub.org/ - with another UK bitcoiner. Again with the other party doing all the deving work with me doing everything else.
|
|
|
matthewh3,
What was your relationship with Tom that allowed you to order his FPGAs before the product was announced? What are your thoughts on him not paying ASIC preorders back after ending the project?
Tom stopped answering my emails since he started bASIC also CoinConnect (what I put a lot of work into) has been offline the same amount of time. It was the fact I worked on CoinConnect and BFL-FPGA orders were taking so long that we went with Tom. There was a time we was thinking of switching to bASIC but after our FPGA delays and investor advice we stuck out with BFL like we should have from the very beginning as we'd have FPGA's mining now. Tho we did get full resale value for our FPGA's from Tom devices. Have a lot of people lost out?
|
|
|
What are the current finances?
x3 BFL-SC-Singles plus a BTC10.00 Pyramining ASIC deposit. hargax - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=63429 - may be coming to work for us for another of the 1% of profits Salaries to help Evolex plus more. This doesn't effect accounts as 5% of all profits after hosting cost's is being taken for wages anyway. Although no salaries will be paid until we have our third ASIC hashing for a month. Both employees can be sacked by motions but only major investors can call motions. Or groups of small shareholders with a total of at least 5% of stock. We ordered our first BFL-SC-Single just after two weeks of pre-sales started in early July. I know that seems like a joke but I have faith for BFL to ship eventually just like they did with there FPGA. Also due to the chip 'fab' size our ASIC's should hold there value much longer than Avalon's in this race to the bottom. The reason as bitcoin mining is a race to the bottom is why we're reinvesting 90% of profits into more ASIC's to increase our (MH/s)per share rate faster than the growth in network difficulty.
|
|
|
What are the current finances?
x3 BFL-SC-Singles plus a BTC10.00 Pyramining ASIC deposit. hargax - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=63429 - may be coming to work for us for another of the 1% of profits Salaries to help Evolex plus more. This doesn't effect accounts as 5% of all profits after hosting cost's is being taken for wages anyway. Although no salaries will be paid until we have our third ASIC hashing for a month. Both employees can be sacked by motions but only major investors can call motions. Or groups of small shareholders with a total of at least 5% of stock.
|
|
|
The three BFL-SC-Singles due to start shipping by the 18th of Feb Dividends will be monthly Did the BFL-SC-Singles ship? I'm gonna venture a guess of no here. The last I read was they said they would start shipping next week (AFAIK)
|
|
|
The amount of bitcoin transactions over a seven day average set a new high in February
|
|
|
rGwUWgN5BEg3QGNY3RX2HfYowjUTZdid3E
I've extended trust to bitstamp and have a small balance with them in USD & BTC. I'm curious if someone can take an IOU from them.
Thanks!
I have BITSTAMP BTC and GBP IOU credits and I'll swap you £0.01 BITSTAMP IOU for $0.015 BITSTAMP IOU rJAJuQLVp8JJaCfP3hT7ZCrVMRTFNYQcHi
|
|
|
i dont understand any of this... , i send you 1 xpr to establish a link?
I think so? There is no way for me to just send a £0.01 BITSTAMP IOU to an address. First they have to award me GBP trust even tho its credit not debt.
|
|
|
rJAJuQLVp8JJaCfP3hT7ZCrVMRTFNYQcHi
Trusted @ 0.01 Not received any notification in 'History' Are you - r3t5JvXF6rChFs4kCFe44a3h4eQdxmPo9a - as have 0.01BTC of trust now If you want me to send you a £0.01 BITSTAMP IOU credit give me some GBP trust
|
|
|
It could get rid of BTC-E and MTGOX, but the GUI needs alot of work. Very BETA now. I'd say that I'd believe in it more if I could buy a pizza there (and not have to wait on a confirmation like that pizza site). ATM, only two Gateways created and they are just exchanges.
Also, there is no directory of businesses yet. Stuff like that to give it the "community" feature that Bitcoin lacks. Potential undelivered at this time.
Not if BTC-E and MtGox become 'trusted' Ripple Gateways.
|
|
|
rJAJuQLVp8JJaCfP3hT7ZCrVMRTFNYQcHi
Trusted @ 0.01 Not received any notification in 'History'
|
|
|
rJAJuQLVp8JJaCfP3hT7ZCrVMRTFNYQcHi
|
|
|
I would like one please.. ripple address rJZrZTkMYrqe94c1V6KS1gbYpcaJRQqcd8
Send me 1.00 XRP to establish a link then give me trust for GBP. rJAJuQLVp8JJaCfP3hT7ZCrVMRTFNYQcHi
|
|
|
I've still got both the anon options in my wallet using the Chrome extension. Not checked from the HTTPS version tho?
|
|
|
I don't know much about it but just read about it on Wikipedia. Alarm bells were ringing when I saw this. Note that the Ripple protocol itself wouldn't preclude a hierarchical payment structure evolving, it just allows for the possibility of other structures. If it allows a hierachical payment structure that means it allows being controlled by a centralised power which then gets us back to square one. I think we can expect a lot of competitors to bitcoin to spring up with allowing hierarchical structures as part of their hidden agenda. I'll stick with bitcoins edit: so to answer the original question I say its a rival. I well its opensource (soon IIRC) and anyone can start a 'trusted' Gateway. So if it gains momentum and takes off I think it will greatly ease and decentralises further the buying and selling of bitcoins.
|
|
|
Thanks for sharing
|
|
|
If you are afraid of OpenCoin actions, just don't use them (XRP) as asset. Use them just as their primary function, they are against spam. You need few XRP to use all the exchange functions of the Ripple network.
True, plus you never need be in debt if you use Ripple, just buy all your IOU's from trusted gateways like BITSTAMP to make payments.
|
|
|
|