Pointing to this current thread where you've been threatening some members. Who have I threaten and how? Is threatening = scamming? Bitcointalk and some other users commit the criminal offense of defamation towards Game Protect since a long time! Where is the warning about bitcointalk.org and the criminals committing the criminal offense of defamation towards Game Protect? Have you checked the threads you opened when being logged out of the forum ? Yes, since a long time bitcointalk.org committed the criminal offense of defamation with publicly stating this: Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution. The crazy part is that believing is not knowing and not knowing confirms that Game Protect did not scam anyone! Therefore some bitcointalk users not knowing / having proof that Game Protect scammed anyone is the best trust rating you can get, but instead bitcointalk warns about Game Protect even though I have the best trust rating you can get on bitcointalk. Bitcontalk says it did not check the beliefs, but the way how they publish it and as they warn to deal with extreme caution makes threm liable for the criminal offense of defamation. Bitcointalk recently changed the text to: Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they believe that the creator of this topic displays some red flags which make them high-risk. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution. What is the difference between "is a scammer" and "displays some red flags"? |
|
|
|
Creating a proper and well documented flag support thread against a stupid scammer is a waste of time. Correct! It is unlike more lucrative to put the proof on the table who I scammed and for how much and get 5 BTC: Get 5 BTC for proof who Game Protect scammed and for how much?So why does marlboroza waste his time with this thread or flag or whatever it is instead of getting 5 BTC? Is he extremely mentally ill or does he intentionally commit the criminal offense of defamation with claiming that after 3,5 years without any scam using this service is a high-risk? |
|
|
|
Can you please stop paying brain dead bitcointalk accounts representing your brand? If the casino owners were responsible for the volume, they are still paying to the token holders like me as much as they promised. So they would be making a loss in there. Thank you for confirming that over 90% of the revenue is generated by themselves and that the rake players pay do not cover the monthly expenses!  Not as much of a loss depending how much they hold but they would pay from all the distributed profits from their own pockets anyway., They pay the rakeback from their own pockets = loss and not from the 1,5% rake they received from players? We are all adults (right?) and we can act like that. You obviously act like a brain dead! |
|
|
|
If the casino owners were responsible for the volume, they are still paying to the token holders like me as much as they promised. So they would be making a loss in there. Thank you for confirming that over 90% of the revenue is generated by themselves and that the rake players pay do not cover the monthly expenses! Not as much of a loss depending how much they hold but they would pay from all the distributed profits from their own pockets anyway., They pay the rakeback from their own pockets = loss and not from the 1,5% rake they received from players? We are all adults (right?) and we can act like that. You obviously act like a brain dead! |
|
|
|
If the casino owner wagered EOS worth $500 million and private players wagered EOS worth $50 million, then the casino owner gets 90% of the BET fantasy tokens and 90% of the 70% profit share!
One noob brain dead question : What will happen if a group of private players wager EOS worth of $5000 million in above scenario ? $5000 million wagered with 1,5% rake = $75 million rake paid. Casino owner gets 30% of the $75 million rake = $22,5 million. Still, owners will not lose on wagering EOS worth $500 million? $500 million wagered with 1,5% rake = $7,5 million rake paid. 1) Casino owner gets 30% of the $7,5 million rake = $2,25 million. 2) For the $7,5 million rake paid to himself the casino owner gets BET fantasy tokens that will get 70% of the $7,5 million rake paid = $5,25 millionHence, casino owner wagered $500 million and paid $7,5 million rake to himself and gets 1) $2,25 million + 2) $5,25 million = $7,5 million rakeback and lost nothing except the EOS transaction fees. |
|
|
|
|
Do you think it is a good idea to let brain dead people represent your amazing brand?
|
|
|
|
If you use this as definition for scammer, then this forum is the biggest scammer in the world!!! Feel free to open a flag on theymos for operating a scamming forum. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ I have the identity and location of 2 participants and have other options to hold them liable.  |
|
|
|
If the owner sends EOS to his own casino, to who m will he lose 1,5%?  They will lose 70% of house edge(which is 1.5% of wagering amount) to rest of bet token holders. You must remember all the bet token holders get the 1.5% house edge and the team only has the 30% of all bet tokens (unless they played as well) which means the shareholders will get it not the team. Hence, on generating fake volume, owners will lose 70% of house edge unless otherwise they have bought 100% of circulating supply. Why to the rest of BET fantasy token holders? If the casino owner wagered EOS worth $500 million and private players wagered EOS worth $50 million, then the casino owner gets 90% of the BET fantasy tokens and 90% of the 70% profit share! Dumb, dumber, brain dead! |
|
|
|
You scammed all people visiting your site by lying and displaying wrong information in order to make money through affiliate links.
You did not steal from them directly. Nonetheless this is a scam. If you use this as definition for scammer, then this forum is the biggest scammer in the world!!! |
|
|
|
I assume the falsifying could be only said for the volume of the wagered amounts at the best case and not for the trade volume since they are not traded anywhere at all right now. Even with that in mind how could fake volume would help the team? They would be losing 1.5% of their money they put in and considering they are getting 30% of it back the rest of it will go somewhere else. I highly recommend to install a brain test prior to allowing to open an account! If the owner sends EOS to his own casino, to who will he lose 1,5%? |
|
|
|
If Stunna wants to publish my personal message, then he has to ask for my authorization and this did not happen! Once you send the message, you have no control over it. No one needs your permission. In the real world you need my permission to publish it! But what Stunna has published is not my personal message and therefore irrelevant. |
|
|
|
(quoting from another thread to avoid derailing it) Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they believe that the creator of this topic displays some red flags which make them high-risk. Believing = not knowing = confirmation it is not the case! Case closed. game-protect believes the flag is good, please everyone support it. Bitcointalk users believe, I state only facts. If I have a belief, I go to the church. |
|
|
|
A flag to show that Game Protect is not a scammer is a good idea.  Flags always mean there is something wrong so you will always get the negative impression from it unfortunately. The only positive impression you may get is from a positive feedback or neutral feedback with positive statement in it. This is not true! Believing means not knowing that Game Protect is a scammer! Not knowing that Game Protect is a scammer confirms that Game Protect is not a scammer. The more users believe = confirm that I am not a scammer, the higher is the trust rating and I have the best trust rating you can get on bitcointalk The correct versions are: Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they believe that the creator of this topic displays some red flags which make them high-risk trustworthy. Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they know / have proof that the creator of this topic displays some red flags which make them high-risk. |
|
|
|
I challenge you to place this 5 BTC with a trusted escrow and clear terms. Otherwise all this is, is free PR for you with zero risk. You won't however, because you are afraid some one might claim it and you would have to pay to expose your own criminal activity Yes, the offer to give 5 BTC for proof who I scammed and for how much is zero risk for me because I never scammed anyone! |
|
|
|
In the real world the one who claims something has to put the proof of his claim on the table! Okay, cool. Where's the proof that you had not scammed over the past 3.5 years? No proof available that I scammed someone is the proof! |
|
|
|
The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. In the real world the one who claims something has to put the proof of his claim on the table! What game-protect messaged one of our players (shared with their permission): If Stunna wants to publish my personal message, then he has to ask for my authorization and this did not happen! |
|
|
|
How much is one BET fantasy token worth?
Really appreciate the work you do here on the forum, and yet it goes so under appreciated. The marketing tactics used by EOSBet are downright shady and they need to address the situation. Exchanges always get called out for wash trading, but EOSBet gets away with falsifying its trade volume to climb the dapp rankings.... Seems unfair. How can they falsify their volume, can you provide a link to your source? Surely they would have been caught and advised against it The volume of EOS transactions made to the EOSBet investment fraud scheme can be verified on the blockchain, but you can not verify who made the EOS transactions! You can see how the brain wash expert CryptoCheckk claims that all transactions can be verified, but he totally ignores that the identity of the sender is anonymous! So the owners of the EOSBet investment fraud scheme easily can generate 90% of the deposits made to EOSBet by themselves and then they pay the BET fantasy tokens also to themselves and everything stays in the scam family!  Game Protect has many years experience with online casinos and startups and it is impossible that EOSBet with 50% more rake like competitors and a poor game offer made anywhere near $7,7 million profit within 9 months! If you ask them for any kind of proof of their claims they are not able to deliver! Also, if EOSBet had the potential to generate such huge winnings, why do they want to giveaway the profit lifetime to players? That does not make any sense! Where can you work one month and then get an income lifetime? Nowhere in the real world! |
|
|
|
A flag to show that Game Protect is not a scammer is a good idea. |
|
|
|
|
How much is one BET fantasy token worth?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
