Without a doubt the Quickseller / Panthers52 / Tomatocage and extraKrispy scam by (as Default Trust) leaving negative feedback / trust and then offering their own Alt's up as escrow thus taking the mark-up on BTC sales and the escrow fee would have to fall into scam / fraud and extortion all in one?

More names of Alt's or other's who are (or were) on the default Trust (DT) list as I become aware of them.

Quickseller / Panthers52 / Tomatocage and extraKrispy scam ref: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=855778.msg12402622#msg12402622

...that should read Panthers52...

Not exactly a bee in my bonnet, but still...

Can someone who knows how to take a screen grab of Quickseller / Panther52 / Tomatocage and extraKrispy 's full trust / feedback in one grab?

I can take screen grabs one page at a time, but it would be better if I had a copy of their entire trust feedbacks both given and received in one shot.

Specifically, I am looking for phrases such as

"PayPal scammer avoid" and / or "reversible method of payment"

"use escrow services" in the same negative trust comment as the ones above.

especially when s/he has given negative feedback / trust especially to newbies but in any instances.

I'm beginning to wonder if it could be argued that by giving negative feedback  and then "suggesting" escrow that it is extortion or intimidation?

eg "I will remove if they use escrow" is another phrase to look out for.

I'd also like to know if anyone that previously had negative feedback / trust for these four has suddenly had that negative trust removed??  Screen shots would be essential.

The wash-up from all of this is that all the newbies who got stung by Quickseller / Panther52 / Tomatocage and extraKrispy now have 0: -0 / +0 on their default trust - I can see zombies on the horizon, all these alt's slowly rising from the dead because they no longer have default negative trust / feed back and can massage their way back into life (they aren't day old accounts any longer, and who's going to go back and give them more negative trust / feed back for historical "suspicion"?).

[quote author=marcotheminer link=topic=855778.msg9522112#msg9522112 date=1415815074]
Reserved for information if needed.
[/quote]

Perhaps you can edit this to read ... or words to that effect.

---

---

Am condensing my six trust wall posts into one:

Yeh... I saw that one too - not very conclusive either all is says is Tomatocage was the escrow.

Where's the "I accuse Tomatocage of escrowing for himself..." link please?

Edit:

Two posts down from your link is this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1171059.msg12363941#msg12363941 which links to this:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=938340.msg10358524#msg10358524 where Tomatocage confirms he is indeed an alt of extraKrispy

2nd edit this links https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=793183.msg8944970#msg8944970 confirms Tomatocage escrowed for his own alt of extraKrispy


(am doing everyone else's work for them here...)

"I bet you say that to alllllllllllll the boys...."

I wonder if this http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/20303/how-would-i-generate-a-valid-vanity-address-for-destroying-coins?lq=1 had anything to do with it?

I'm beginning to think I should just put in my tagline: If you want to pay with PayPal YOU can go first.

OK Solved:

All three codes are the public and private keys for an alt / crypto coin (not sure which)

The first code (Code 1) top line that begins... eyJHMDkw is the public key and is used to calculate the private part which is line two of code 2.

in code 3 the second line of both code one and two have either been added together or multiplied giving the private key answer which is line two of code 3.

1 BTC please.

Heh - Yeh, I saw that one the other day, not very conclusive.  I'll wait for the person making the scam accusation to come good on their claim.

Could you please provide a link/s to your scam accusation please? 

Do we get to work at Bletchly Park by any chance?

10. Nc3 please

...and for anyone sending cash, get ready to hit negative feedback / trust when the "I didn't receive your cash in the mail, the mailman must have stolen it." Ruse is used.

...and for Anon136 - messing with your head time - every note you receive in the mail will be marked by the CIA / FBI / KGB / CI5 / MI6 / CONTROL / KAOS / RU12 and the little old lady with the flower shop down the road.

Enjoy. 

Hey thanks for that - Nice to know - looking forward to the next graph.

*edit* I'm going bonkers...  I think I was misreading Qh4 and Qf4 earlier on.  Apologies to all.

Who "voted" for which please?

*edit* and why place a red line at 90% ?

2nd edit languagehasmeaning and abacus were both leaning toward Qf4 if I read them correctly which is why I asked.

Who do I make the cheque out to?

No offense bud, but IDK...

PayPal + selling old accounts which earnt you neg feedback / trust

Just out of curiosity, would you go first with me or am I not trust worthy enough (and yes, it's a trick question).

Unless the next move it were blocked, the Bishop could then return to it's Point of origin (or smash his way out) same with the knight if others want to return the blockade to how it is.

What are the chances of *two* Newbie Males from Buenos Aires both vying for the same BTC within minutes of each other (the second registering ten minutes after the first's post?)



*edit* ...and both registering within the same ten minute time frame two days apart...