How about asking precicly what you want to know (in the resp. language board if english is a problem) and give as much details as possible?
|
|
|
Guck mal ob es klappt wenn Du bitcoin core mit
-datadir=/Volumes/Externe
startest. Mit dem richtigen Pfad sollte das eigentlich klappen.
|
|
|
-snip- Requirements: 1. This should be the only signature you have 2. This sig should display correctly, if you too junior you will not have enough space in your sig. In this case you don't qualify. 3. You can't change you sig until campaign end.
Get sorted out which ranks can apply and which not, change #2 afterwards. As in: only members or higher allowed. Rules of the auction: 1. Once we have 7 people who qualify I will start a campaign. In rare case more then 7 manage to sign up I will pick only 7! 2. Campaign ends one week after it starts. 3. I will count posts you made in this week and the first 5 people with the most posts will get paid 0.01 BTC 4. Bottom 2 don't get paid, but I still appreciate your support 5. I know I don't pay much, but please don't cheat and don't spam. I'll try to find people who play unfair.
5 is not a Rule, is it? WHy call it auction? Is it an auction? If so, why a fixed price? 4 is just bs IMHO. If you only want to pay 5, you should only hire 5. 2 means you only want to do this 1 week? So its a one time deal? 3 together with 4 means you are basically promoting spam. Think about it, the week is almost over all of your 7 contestants will know where they stand and will try to reach at least spot #5. There will be spam, there will be drama. Again if you only can/want to pay 5 people, hire 5 people, not more. -snip- Opinions? Mine is since it is BTC denominated it does not matter where it comes from, its convertible at a decent exchange rate apparently and can compete with the sig campaigns here. Worthy of a mention even independent of the forum campaign.
Well you are paying in bitcoin if I understood you correctly, so you are correct here. You are paying directly, correct?
|
|
|
Welches ist das Beste, bzw machts einen Unterschied?
Die Unterschiede zwischen den bekannten/beliebten Bitcoin-core, Armory, Multibit, Electrum und ggf. HiveOS (hab kein Mac, kann da nix zu sagen) sind zu vernachlässigen, es sei denn Du hast bestimmte Ansprüche. Armory gilt als besonders sicher, Electrum als leicht zu sichern (1x Seed reicht), etc. Hatte beim Download von Armory eine Trojanermeldung, ist da was dran?
Wenn eine von den ausführbaren Dateien als Trojaner gemeldet wird, wär ich erstmal skeptisch und würd die Datei ggf. beim Hersteller des Scanners einschicken. Dann können die prüfen obs ne Fehlmeldung ist oder nicht. Wobei die komisch sind was Bitcoin angeht, Mining-Software gilt bei einigen als Virus und auch von vanitygen hab ich sowas schon gehört. Trojaner/Virusmeldung bei den Blockchaindaten ist fast schon üblich. Da sind in der Tat Virensignaturen drin. Da hat sich mal jemand nen Spaß erlaubt und spezielle Transaktionen gemacht. Bei Bitcoin Core hingegen keine Probleme.
|
|
|
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F2FCpH8o.png&t=663&c=M_vyDDk7Wif0Mw) Just to make this clear. Top one not correct (thats what happens if you use the full member sig as member), bottom one correct (for Full Members).
|
|
|
Its not doing anything without javascript, I dont like that ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif)
|
|
|
-snip- Security level: tin foil hat.
Only conceivable problem I see is when you actually want to spend your hyper-secured coins. You don't have Qt + Armory/Electrum to sign transactions offline (in this scenario) so you have to import the private key onto an online computer at some point which may be dangerous unless you spend the outputs instantly (although this is quite unlikely). Given this, I'd probably still say that you'd be better off just downloading Qt and Armory and making sure they've been GPG signed and match both sha1 and md5 checksums. Then copy them to a formatted USB and onto an offline computer. Yes, with increase security comes decreased comfort. One could spend the outputs instantly and use a newly generated (same machine, its there allready, so why not use it again) address for the change or rest. I was merely suggesting this as a solution since OP asked for the "safest" wallet. ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif)
|
|
|
-snip- There are full member users with signature that looks exactly like his, but with blue instead of black line. See allcoiminer for example.
I personally think its not that bad, but still the wrong one
What you mean? He said: Full Members use the Full Members signature. The user I quoted used the full member signature without beeing full member yet. Since Members (with out the full infront) may not use color in their signature, the "bar" appears black instead of blue.
|
|
|
1) Get a computer that has never been onlne 2) Install bitcoin qt from usb 3) Send bitcoin 4) Make back-up 5) HODL 6) Profit
#2 and #4 could be compromised/attacked. IMHO the safest possible bitcoin "wallet" would be #1 offline computer with open source OS #2 deck of cards [1] or other form of sufficient entropy #3 generate ECDSA key with the libary/tools the OS brings (use #2 for entropy) #4 generate your address [2] #5 encrypt everything #6 never use the machine for anything else, unless you want to spend the coins Security level: tin foil hat. [1] see discussion here whether you prefer a DIY set or a bought set https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=706978.0[2] steps/algos used https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Technical_background_of_version_1_Bitcoin_addresses------------------------ -snip- Will some cheap windows xp work out?
While it makes little difference for an offline machine, if you are concerned about security you should not use an OS that is no longer supported by the developers.
|
|
|
I assume you are talking about the wallet.dat bitcoin core uses, other clients might work differently.
The wallet.dat contains (among other data) your private keys, thus it is essential for the security of yours coin that they are protected. The algorithm used is AES256 IIRC.
This will indeed make the file unreadable while encrypted.
|
|
|
aber localbitcoins ist daher wesentlich unsicherer, nehme ich an. geschärzer Kontoauszug? Dann steht da BLZ & Kontonummer. Und die erhalten einen deutschen Kontoauszug. Vielleicht ist das auf amerikanischen ja anders. Was soll der dann beweisen? Dann Funktioniert das nicht als "proof of residency". Bei mir z.B. ging nur ne Meldebescheinigung, da alle anderen Rechnungen hier nicht auf meinen Namen laufen. Das Prinzip kommt halt aus den USA wo es soweit ich weiß keine Ausweispflicht gibt und auch keine Meldebehörden wie bei uns. Das heißt die mussten sich was anderes überlegen um eine Adresse zu bestätigen. Das sind dann halt Rechnungen die auf Deinen Namen und auf Deine Adresse ausgestellt sind. Meist Storm-,Wasser-,Gasrechnung o.ä. Wichtig ist nur das Dein Name und Deine Adresse auf einem Schreiben steht was irgendwie nach Rechnung aussieht. Das sowas total leicht zu fälschen ist da brauchen wir uns nicht drüber unterhalten. Es geht Kraken darum deren gesetzliche Vorgaben (KYC/AML) einzuhalten. Know your customer/Anti money laundering.
|
|
|
The seed is all you need, correct.
|
|
|
the easiest and quickest way might be to send the wallet to a trust escrow person and have them load the wallet and send the address you specific. it might cost you a small fee depending on who you use.
What? Just send the coins yourself, why would you use an escrow service for this? How is that even easy and quick?
|
|
|
IIRC there was a thread regarding this on the YubiKey board. One of their admins/mods/... said that they are worthless and should not be used anymore since there was no way to wipe them. found it: Admin at their board says: "if its locked, buy a new one"
forum.yubico.com/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=1340
|
|
|
very nice to see that this puzzle got solved i never did attempt to solve it nor to check what it was all about. Did someone just have to find address or what was the point of the game?
the address was easy, the hard part was to get the private key. If you want you can read my summary, it might give you an idea how the two week hunt was. https://mega.co.nz/#!8tITXZRQ!4wDTy5j- MgzeDFt_N81ieTwGLvm0eN5GZtVpCrB2NE4
|
|
|
Even though this thread is self moderated i will not delete your comment simply because it actually shows who the troll is.
Thanks for finally admitting that you are indeed S4VV4S.
|
|
|
Ah. Okay... ?? What in case all coins have been premined, as it can be seen with some AltCoins ? No new blocks mined = no transactions confirmed. Without mining the network dies. Of cause!
Minging will never end and the last Bitcoin will never be mined!
Ofc there will be a time when the last bitcoin has been mined, from that day on only transactions fees will be the reward for mining.
|
|
|
Hallo,
Wie man oben schon raus lesen kann würde ich gerne wissen was der Unterschied zwischen PoS coins und PoW coins sind?
Kann mir das mal jemand bitte erklären?
Grüße Chairman
PoS = Proof of Stake = Wer viel hat (im Sinne von Coins) bekommt viel vom Blockreward. Funktioniert ein bisschen wie Zins. PoW = Proof of Work = Wer viel macht (im Sinne von Hashen) bekommt den Blockreward.
|
|
|
|