|
Seems like a fun game, so is the aim of it just to find and collect btc around the internet?
|
|
|
|
|
I wanna join in, seems quite cool.
|
|
|
|
Post the source code so we can see it is clean.
I don't consider to make it open source. Also, you can decompile apk file and see the source of it. Android is completely open  If anyone can decompile and recompile the apk, what protects the closed source?  When is the coming out any way. |
|
|
|
|
So how is it recorded to the blockchain
|
|
|
|
I know that feeling bro, I lost a wayyyy bigger amount.
Just don't dice again, let this be a lesson.
Damn!!! How many did you loose sir? I would not like state, but it was a chunky amount. Just don't dice more than you can afford. |
|
|
|
Thanks, that was really helpful. |
|
|
|
|
I know that feeling bro, I lost a wayyyy bigger amount.
Just don't dice again, let this be a lesson.
|
|
|
|
I want to join!
Count me in,
Signature added.
You've been selected. Thank you for your support. Thanks a lot. |
|
|
|
Because they think it is stupid buying something that they can get for "free" by mining. I imagine that they learn fairly quickly though The irony in that though. |
|
|
|
i doubt they are a ponzi, i made my ROI in about 60 days, so im happy with hashlets
That's interesting considering hashlets have been out for only 45 days. Do you own a time machine? Like I said there seems to be a steady stream of bullshit flowing from anything GAW. He could of meant that he's going to make his return in about 60 days. |
|
|
|
According to them they are leasing most of their hash power to companies (some people even suspected they are doing some code or phone cracking with it) and the payouts are calculated based on the pool payments, so yes it's probably done by a server. Smells like BS. How can you possible use scrypt/sha256 miners to do anything other than scrypt/sha256 hashing? They showed the pictures of 2 data centers they were building and a warehouse full of hardware, so the hash is not fake. Pics don't prove their legitimacy but I'd still love to see them. So far I've only seen a bunch of unplugged miners in a warehouse that they claimed was mining but was clearly not. What I want to see is a publicly verifiable address which is mining with 250+ GH/s on the scrypt network like they claim. 1/4th of the entire scrypt network is not easy to hide unless it doesn't exist. I suspect the main difference between GAW and other companies, the one that makes people suspicious, is that the software seems completely separate of the hardware. You're doing all these upgrades, boosts, pool switching in the API, but it doesn't affect your miner directly. It just afects the way your profits are calculated, while they are directing the power to whatever they feel is profitable at the moment. Why don't they just cut the BS/marketing gimmicks and give people a reasonable deal on hosted hardware? Why all the games/obfuscation? What's so hard about having integrity? Look at Hashnest (owned by Bitmain) for example; they claim to have 4Ph for sale and we can easily verify they own at least that amount. As you can see here: http://mempool.info/pools Antpool (Bitmain) has 3% of the network which equates to ~7PH. Side note: Why are 100% of your posts GAW related? I think because he's affiliated with GAW |
|
|
|
That was quite eye opening, but I guess you can be more cautious than that. |
|
|
|
u should NEVER change your ip. cause then we wouldn't be able to track u
why u want to track me? 'cause he's from the NSA. |
|
|
|
|
Nice, I like it. However I hope you are going to change that icon.
|
|
|
|
|
I thought paypal accepting bitcoin would at leas bump the price, right now the average is sitting at $381.64
|
|
|
|
The last sign that went up received 27 000 bitcoins, correct me if i'm wrong. What happened to this one? |
|
|
|
The reason PayPal are embracing bitcoin is because they are currently unable to serve the market of digital asset vendors. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chargeback#Reason_codesCheck out this "Quality" reason code. It essentially allows blatant theft of digital products. Take this scenario: 1. I buy a digital asset from you (some Photoshop design files) for $100 2. I claim the files are of poor quality and open a Paypal dispute 3. Paypal sides with you and stating digital assets cannot be returned, the dispute is closed in your favour 4. I escalate the dispute to my credit card company 5. The CC company says "Did you return the product?" 6. I say "hurr durr Yes... I sent it (the files) back" (Digital assets cannot be returned) 7. The CC company approves the chargeback and forcibly takes the money from Paypal 8. Paypal says "So sorry, it's the banks not us" and takes your money 9. Now I have my $100 and your Photoshop files. 10. Enter bitcoin Paypal loves bitcoin because they hate CC companies, not necessarily because they think it's cool. After all the trouble paypal has had, Lol. Finally accepting it, Why couldn't they see this in the first place. |
|
|
|
|
I want to join!
Count me in,
Signature added.
|
|
|
|
|
Unsure if you're still accepting.
Post count: 258
Full member
|
|
|
|
|
You should try post this in the other languages boards.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
