How do some 1% - 2% have the wherewithal to so dominate the 98%+  I already explained it: Just look at the quote: "Like anything else, nature is the best teacher". Human life is a story of the individual moseying around, then comes in contact with a collective group who kicks them in the face, forcing the individual into a collective group of their own in order to not go extinct. Jews practice all these blatantly obvious traits, which is why they're winning, while trying to impose Marxism on everyone else to prevent them from coming together for common interests to compete at all. They are also heavy into anarchism, except not for their own civilization, only to destabilize others to take them over.
In other words, they use "Liberalism" as a weapon to weaken, destabilize, then divide and conquer: "6. Political freedom is an idea but not a fact. This idea one must know how to apply whenever it appears necessary with this bait of an idea to attract the masses of the people to one's party for the purpose of crushing another who is in authority. This task is rendered easier if the opponent has himself been infected with the idea of freedom, SO-CALLED LIBERALISM, and, for the sake of an idea, is willing to yield some of his power. It is precisely here that the triumph of our theory appears; the slackened reins of government are immediately, by the law of life, caught up and gathered together by a new hand, because the blind might of the nation cannot for one single day exist without guidance, and the new authority merely fits into the place of the old already weakened by liberalism."
"14. In any State in which there is a bad organization of authority, an impersonality of laws and of the rulers who have lost their personality amid the flood of rights ever multiplying out of liberalism, I find a new right - to attack by the right of the strong, and to scatter to the winds all existing forces of order and regulation, to reconstruct all institutions and to become the sovereign lord of those who have left to us the rights of their power by laying them down voluntarily in their liberalism."
|
|
|
|
If only it was as simple to explain as "Jews!!"
It is by far more relevant to blame "elites". The La Guarde's, Draghi's, Bernanke's, Rogoff's are all part of guiding the system to suit their interests in the way they believe is best for us (them). It's cronyism and corruption. Same belief in theory, same modelling, same circles, same education, same application to society.
There is no sinister religious overtone. "jews" aren't trying to enslave the worlds population, that is one level down thinking.
It actually is that simple, and they tell you straight out of their own mouths: Rabbi Jews: "Non-Jews Are Goyim Cattle Meant To Serve Us Jews"http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wCLtAbULUtwIsraelis: Do you believe that gentiles (goys) will be slaves for the Jews?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Ji_Y7YEbKYIf you're some kind of idiot and don't believe the words out of their own mouths and that this is how the Talmud and Torah work, you can utilize a rudimentary understanding of statistics to figure out they've used extreme nepotism to completely take over the media, banks, financial system, and even education system. Power over the media and monetary system gives you absolute power over everything. You've also kind of made yourself look ridiculous citing Ben "Shalom" Bernanke as a non-Jew. As for Christine Lagarde, people claim she is not one, but they have tons of Shabbos Goy slaves working for them like Lindsey Graham and John McCain, so it doesn't really matter. Although, she does have a pretty big hooked nose, so I wouldn't be surprised if she was and just tried to hide her history. She does seem to be having a great time with the other cackling hooked nose demon on the right and there's a lot of similarity between the two:  |
|
|
|
he's fucking nuts enough that it will either succeed or burn spectacularly
 |
|
|
|
Because there were gaps in the charts that had no resistance there. As I mentioned below there was no need for it to stop anywhere in between: Lowest it can dump to is $720ish, while the current upside targets are $815 and $900.
|
|
|
|
you don't even seem to be aware that Armstrong managed a fund in Japan that was $3 trillion which was more than half of the US debt at the time.
Yea, I'm aware he likes to brag about trading volume, and that he goes to all the little financier conventions, which is how you know he's a shill. You will never see Armstrong talk about something like this:  You're gonna use the excuse of, oh he doesn't want to cause any problems, he's just a trader blah blah. Bullshit. He's already got enough money where he doesn't have to worry about who he offends. The fact that he does nothing but blog about supposed roots of illness of the monetary system all day yet mentions nothing about this ethnocentric mafia cult behind it is hilarious. It's they who are behind trying to force people into a cashless, digital only slave system too, yet Armstrong practically cheerleads for them like they're an unstoppable inevitability. No, all these people can and will die just like 1940's all over again because they've overplayed their hand. I'm tired of cuckolds not calling out who the devil in the room is while pretending to give explanations for why things the way they are. Armstrong is trash and part of the problem. Fuck Armstrong, we're not having a cashless slave system run by the Jews, we're making the holocaust great again. Tell him to shove that in his magical computer and see what comes out.  |
|
|
|
ATH or single digits?
The bankers decided to let us pump Bitcoin to the moon to acclimate people to their cashless society prison until they figure out that most people are spending the profits on things like gold and silver.  |
|
|
|
See here - Ibn Khaldun 400 years ago:  Much of his work was ahead of his time and continues to be applicable today. Adam Smith built onto this work with more great insight. Since general accounting practices don't exist (and how could they in some leveraged, floating variable fractional reserve system) it's more like the quantum world double slit experiment:  |
|
|
|
Btw, anyone giving any credence to FOFOA needs their head examined. YOU are the one that brought up FOFOA referencing him first in this thread, not me. I'm the one that said he claimed silver would go to $0.50 and it went from $5 to $50 INSTEAD. I then mentioned he expects a gold reval, which everyone and their mom on the planet also expects, only to speculate on what the magic number will be. Harry S. Dent is another charlatan who has totally changed his thesis after his predictions were totally annihilated by the 2008-9 market collapse.
Harry Dent and Armstrong's thesis on metals are essentially the same thing at this juncture in time. I have argued against the conspiracy theorists who claim gold is not up because it has been manipulated by the bankers. I have fought against the bank “real” manipulations and warned clients when they are in action. But the bankers are not capable of manipulating a market counter trend – nobody is. Now Armstrong pretends the federal reserve not only doesn't exist, but it's also incapable of creating economic bubbles and it doesn't manipulate metals either! And things like the PPT don't exist! Good one, Armstrong! The fed can easily distort markets to make something behave how it shouldn't for an entire decade or more. He claims they "can't defeat the trend". If you can distort a market for an entire decade or more, you have "defeated the trend". |
|
|
|
Someone just dumbed 700 BTC on stamp to force the price from $1023 to $999
Someone you say?  |
|
|
|
Just skimmed through it. He predicts $600/oz silver in 2017, heh. Didn't see his BTC estimate, just said "higher". He said BTCiTcoin would be "80808" in dollars or yuan! But not exactly with a specific timeline. And he also said gold will be 20.000$ when the DOW will be 120k (120.000) Looks like he stole my numbers for monetary reset. Same value for gold, same value for silver, and same value for Bitcoin because I said Bitcoin will likely get stuck in the $10k-$20k range without either widespread usage and deployment of LN or a block size increase. So that would be around a 17x for gold, 10x for BTC, and 38x for silver. Bitcoin will perform better as an "emerging technology" until that event occurs, though. |
|
|
|
Just skimmed through it. He predicts $600/oz silver in 2017, heh. Didn't see his BTC estimate, just said "higher". |
|
|
|
Winning
Windows 10, definitely losing. |
|
|
|
Clif High is the same oddball prognosticator who predicted nuclear war in 2010. You may as well get investment advice from Rush Limbaugh. Take a look at his website at halfpasthuman.com.
You forgot the part where he believes the government has captured UFOs and reverse engineers them while creating a breakaway civilization... He does get some other things right though. |
|
|
|
It will be interesting to see what other people think about my gold/silver/bitcoin allocation tables.
I've always thought the FOA idea of revaluing gold at $55,000 was kind of absurd since India and the Arabs have so much of it. The west would just be transferring power to 3rd world nations.
If official figures are to be believed, then the US is actually in good shape with regards to your scenario. I've been collating figures over the last several years: All monetary gold: 33000 tonnes Us has actually 8133 tonnes ECB 10788 Russia 1500* China admits to 1823 tonnes (probably around 4000 total) UK 310 tons left IMF 2800 tonnes Figures are pretty sloppy, but from rough order of magnitude, the current monetary powers seem to roughly match gold holdings. Of course, nobody has seen inside Fort Knox for decades... The Indian government has only 600 tons, but the Indian public has....over 20,000 tons. Canada has basically zero gold, and their citizens also probably have little. So the FOA argument of revaluing gold to some astronomical number would definitely be transferring HUGE power from the 1st world to the 3rd world in a lot of ways. This is why I don't really see a gold hegemony as benefiting anyone that would actually be pulling the trigger on making it happen. If that actually happened, the R-selection giant mass of people in India would then all be rich and go from 1 billion to 4 billion people while the US and other nations have to export all their resources to them. Nobody at round table groups like the CFR wants to see a scenario like that of mass overpopulation and making India king of the world. A lot of people claim that since CBs hoard gold, that they will force gold hegemony in a monetary reset/recapitalization, but it just doesn't make sense in practice. If they went for a bimetallism approach, nobody actually owns large amounts of silver, and they could just acquire it for cheap to dilute the power of places like India's gold holdings if they were forced to use metals for recapitalization. It appears both JP Morgan (possibly acting as an agent of the govt) + China are currently acquiring huge amounts of silver as I talked about here: https://steemit.com/money/@r0achtheunsavory/if-there-s-any-plausible-conspiracy-involving-silver-and-bitcoin-this-is-itIt's also possible Bitcoin was released to accomplish this goal due to the problems of them recapitalizing using metals. The point is, to avoid a new dark ages, they will have to do some type of recapitalization event in a monetary reset that extinguishes debt, and the only real choices at play involve gold, silver, or bitcoin being used in some manner. Bitcoin doesn't seem quite uh, realistic to have the entire world monetary system run on it, but it's definitely one of those backup to a backup plan options. Metals seem like a much more realistic option, but they would either have to take all of India and random Arab nation's gold or go the bimetallism option I spoke of. |
|
|
|
Speculative position closing target: $2500. Stoploss: $100. That is how you trade bitcoin.
I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say a 90% retrace stop loss is not how you trade Bitcoin. |
|
|
|
P.S. Trump your president r0ach? I wanted him to win also, but only cos the alternative was Hillary and almost certain hot war with Russia...... How you feeling about Trump having such a big hard on for Israel?
He has a bunch of Jews in his family, but even I have one that married into my extended family. Having said that, 150,000 Jews did fight for Hitler in WW2, so maybe a few will fight under Trump. It feels like Trump is just giving them free reign to do whatever they want in the middle east to appease their constant crying, while at the same time attacking their media monopolies and possibly actually doing something about the financial system at home (but who knows). Are you aware of the whole FOA/FOFOA "freegold" theory? What's your input on my analysis of freegold vs silver vs bitcoin: https://steemit.com/money/@r0achtheunsavory/if-there-s-any-plausible-conspiracy-involving-silver-and-bitcoin-this-is-it |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
