Indeed small/less known exchanges are the home of less known coins. I'm happy to see OP has hit jackpot.
I just want to warn that small exchanges use to have low liquidity and may not be very transparent at delisting coins. So.. keep your eyes open.

I think that you are overthinking it.
Cashback is simple: you use their referral, they give you back some percents of their earning related to your account.

Too small to even talk about it.

Maybe not the best example since it's more a faucet than a gambling site, but the old freebitco.in use(d) to have direct options for giving cashback to the referred users (maybe it has good ideas you can use).
Also I think that you should not do this only for gambling. If you make a cashback website/service, you should do it for anything that is crypto related and offers referrals - from casinos to faucets and exchanges.

I don't know from my own experience, but I think that people were telling that ATMs give you Bitcoin without ID if the amounts are small (under 150$?).
I know it doesn't sound very reliable, but it can be a path for further investigation.

However, I think that the best options for anonymous transactions are some of the users and services from this forum.

In order to offer you 20% reduction, the account has to have a big number of BNB, which I expect there aren't so many.
A normal account can offer you 10%. At least that's what my account has.

Pretty much everybody who cares about the use and future of the coin, not only the speculation and short term profits.

The problem is not that an exchange is big or small. The important part is the liquidity on that exchange for that specific coin. If the liquidity is very low there's a good chance the price drops heavily or the coin gets delisted before you get the chance to sell it.



And back on-topic, although late: the required number of confirmations should be not so much different from a service to another (although 2x can happen). If the time difference is very big (hours), the second exchange either has issues with the wallet, either makes internal checks (even KYC) they don't want to disclose.

You may not be so far from the truth!
Another idea could be that's a pump done by some whales as a preparation to exit those markets/coins.

Make good quality useful posts.
This also includes not asking about things answered over and over again. get merit site:bitcointalk.org

Since the money is on the blockchain and not in the wallet, the only important thing is to broadcast the signed transaction.
After that the wallet can closed or the internet can be down, it doesn't matter.


The wallet has done the broadcasting, but most probably didn't get to receive the "acknowledge" for that operation and so on.



This is actually a good question (!) because I don't think that the answer can be found in so many places. And as long as you learn, you have to research and ask.

Moderation is indeed the key in gambling. And not only from the funds/money point of view (which is lately expressed a lot - good - ), also from the time point of view (which seems to not be discussed enough).
If too much time is spent in gambling one can lose his friends (become a stranger) or can arise questions in the family (is he cheating?).


And the comparison with the liquors is good. Gambling is still "nice to have" now and then, as long as it's done with moderation.

1. I appreciate that you've chosen Altcoin speculation for this thread. Really.
2. I don't know how good are all the coins from your list, but I will tell about what I know. Imho the % of Bitcoin from the total is too small (I'd keep BTC = 50% of the total). I am not convinced ETH is good enough to stay as bigger % of the investment than every other coin, but I've never trusted ETH too much. BNB looks good.

Fixed 

Keep in mind that altcoins, including XRP, are more risky investments than Bitcoin, which is already risky enough.
I know that Ripple team is trying hard to move the price up, but the money flow into altcoin scene is limited for now.
I think that for now Bitcoin would be a better option and maybe at a later point a switch to altcoin(s) would increase the gains.
But that's just speculation, please use your own calculations when you invest money for real.

All right, then there are even more reasons for at least ban.
I still stick to my logic, repeated trust feedback and trust flag abuse should mean nuke. It's, imho, worse than plagiarism, for example.

GP was not nuked, right? And I guess that's only one easy example.
What I mean is that some of the toxic users seem to get away no matter how much garbage they produce, no matter what we'd like or vote.

And yes, imho flag and trust abuse (usually for retaliatory reasons) should get the account nuked.

Media / news businesses are bought and sold, change management or simply go where they can receive more funds.
Obviously, things like this image show how big hypocrites they are. But really, every news we read (from any source!) should be taken with a pinch of salt. We don't know what they reasons are.

What I mean is, OK, this thread is a great eye opener about one news website. But we actually should be careful with all of them.

I don't know the library you use, but I'd expect to get the bitcoin balance from the blockchain (maybe an Electrum server if you use some API provided by Electrum) and the bitcoin price in USD from an exchange.
All in all, slow operation.

Wrong. The bitcoins are on the blockchain, not in the wallet. The bitcoins never leave the blockchain.
The wallet contains only(*) seed/key in order to let you prove the ownership so you can spend those bitcoins.
So.. what you keep on that USB stick? 

(*) Unless it's a watch only wallet.