I have a question...
So who can give me negative trust?
Because obviously only few people can, also i dont know who can give me positive trust.
Any answers?
Every forum member can leave you any type of trust (positive, neutral, negative). However, only trust from DT1 and DT2 members is visible by default and thus influences your trust rating (as viewed by people that don't use a custom trust list). All other trust ratings are 'untrusted'. Here is the current list of DT1 members: theymos (1)
HostFat (1)
dooglus (1)
Maged (1)
dserrano5 (1)
OgNasty (1)
Tomatocage (1)
SaltySpitoon (1)
DeaDTerra (1)
BadBear (1)
philipma1957 (1)
Cyrus (1)
Blazed (1)
|
|
|
|
Can we stop with the useless conspiracy theories? I can't talk for the other managers, but I have a very strong opinion against market manipulation and attempts at bribing me. Not only would they lose the bribe (money), they'd be exposed and possibly sued (depending on information available).
Depending on information? the campaign owner can't blame signature managers and signature manager easy to say i don't know why they are not active due i was doing the right thing to manage the campaign. You're English literacy is horrible in this post. I can't even understand what you're trying to say here(?). Can you please stop flooding this thread? (you can always PM some of us) If you think that posting here will get you an advantage for getting de-listed, then you are wrong. |
|
|
|
How can you can make campaign B compete with campaign A "easy for you all to put not active member in campaign A"
Can we stop with the useless conspiracy theories? I can't talk for the other managers, but I have a very strong opinion against market manipulation and attempts at bribing me. Not only would they lose the bribe (money), they'd be exposed and possibly sued (depending on information available). 1. buy and sell account
Yes, I've spent 4 years on this forum building up myself so that I can save an additional $10-20 per account sale. Don't you see how absurd this theory is? 2. put high rates as campaign manager
That is much better than random half-baked users, which don't give a damn about those campaigns, undermining the rates just to get the job. 3. selected who can join the signature campaign or easy for you give priority to your friends to join in sig campaigns.
This can already happen with every campaign. Not specially relevant to SMAS. And also by the times goes with this way open to other bitcoin forum compete with bitcointalk because by manipulation scheme the member of forum will leave the forum.
Slippery slope fallacy. |
|
|
|
 Considering that they have never previously posted there, in combination with the time between previous set of posts this seems to be the likely conclusion. All of those 9 posts were made today in <90 minutes. |
|
|
|
I'm not even able to see 'Max' and 'Escrow' at the moment (and I guess It's the case for other people as well) unless I make things smaller so another column will screw the table probably.
What resolution do you use? HD, or even lower? With fHD it currently fits nicely and has enough space for at least another column (I think). |
|
|
|
A curious question, are there ways in which people can give a negative trust for no good reason? Let's say you trading and someone wants to purchase something from you but wants it at a lower price but you refuse and now the person gives you a negative trust. Is this possible and if so is there any way to resolve such an issue?
Thanks.
That's not a valid reason to give someone a negative trust rating IMO (assuming that this story is true). Is their rating visible by default, i.e. are they on DT1 or DT2? If not, then don't be bothered by it. People that are not trusted by default tend to leave all sorts of bad ratings.
This should possibly be split into another thread. |
|
|
|
Since when did disagreeing with Lauda become breaking a forum rule?
You are not disagreeing with me (for that you'd need to have proper arguments, which you don't), you're trolling in several threads now while prior having very little activity in this section. Are you trying to subversively promote your shitcoin? There is nothing to trust here, it's simple graphical representation of mined blocks. That website is as biased as it gets. As I've already mentioned, that is called 'block variance' and thus 24 hour periods should not be observed. If the hashrate support for Segwit is dropping, then that should be observed soon in the chart that I've linked as well. |
|
|
|
|
What do people think about adding another column, i.e. 'Manager'? I think it is also important to list, and provide a nice overview of users managing the campaigns in question. This comes with the cost of widening the list, thus making it look worse on some smaller screens.
|
|
|
|
Segwit was 25% for quite a while and has been dropping, support is waning, maybe you will believe it when variance is below 15% in ~ 2 weeks.  How many times do you have to be warned to stop trolling? You are breaking the forum rules. Anyhow, here is a chart showing Segwit adoption: https://bitcoincore.org/en/segwit_adoption/ Blue line is primarily variance, while the red one shows adoption over a much bigger trend. |
|
|
|
LOL, you did not answer the question.  The answer is no. Your logical fallacies are not surprising considering the things that you're involved with. Actually looking at the latest % you are losing, segwit has lost some % . No, that is called 'variance'. Observing over 24 hours is not exactly the *best* measurement, and even franky1 can tell you this. |
|
|
|
Just in general, your posts do cross me as a signature spammer for some time now. Just for reference in my saying that, I am using your reasoning against you and your post are as common and relevant where you post as the Hero account you flagged for activity from over a year ago; so based on your methods and reasoning that means you are in the same boat and should be tagged.
I have already served out punishment for my past activity, so that ends up being rather pointless. This isn't really an argument of any kind, but rather a red herring. You are directly diverting from the points that I've raised, and my rebuttal of claims such as 'no signature campaign'. I can not complain about your moderator status, for I see nowhere where you have abused this position, but I will "do my research" as you say, just to be save I did not miss something in my public posting.
At least this is a reasonable stance. If you do find moderating errors, make sure to let me know. I'll be very thankful to be given a chance to improve! Lauda is on Blazed trust list, so to have her removed, all you have to do is get blazed to remove her (probably won't happen).
Have we settled this question yet? 
OP, I think this is the only reasonable way out of the complex situation that we find ourselves in: I would advise locking this thread and moving on. Once things cool off, maybe an agreement can be reached in PM.
A witch hunt attempt won't remedy the situation at all, but then again that is solely up to you. I'm fine with both. |
|
|
|
-snip-
that i can read more about unbiased arguments for and against segwit and LN?
You should look for those separately. While one may have plenty more reasons to dislike LN, there is much less to do so with Segwit. There's actually a big page covering the problems/downsides of Segwit on the Bitcoin Core website: Segregated Witness Costs and Risks, and here is the page covering the benefits Segregated Witness Benefits. I think it's at least fairly unbiased considering how openly they addresses many of the potential problems. If I am right, Andreas Antonopoulos supports the Segwit Softfork?
Yes. Listening to AA talk about Segwit may also be a great place to start. |
|
|
|
Lightening Network can't work without SegWit being activated.
There are alternatives to make it work. while it is not an altcoin it is also not Bitcoin. An Alt Payment system might be more accurate.
No, that is false. Did someone pay you to promote SegWit & LN?
Anther useless question by a failed troll. -snip-
The best solution is SegWit project be stoped.
The best solution is for toxic people like you and OP to stop using Bitcoin. Yup i could understand the point of author if there was a point. But there is not. Segwit is now our only scaling solution out there.
Isn't it all ironic how they cry out for on-chain scaling and yet completely attempt to block such improvements to it? For those that are reading, increasing the block size limit is not a solution of any kind. |
|
|
|
It does go against the main purpose. It is an alt. A bad alt.
No, it is not an altcoin. Stop spreading FUD. It is a radical change and unproven. It doesn't work (as a scaling solution).
It has been proven and it works (at least on Bitcoin Testnet). It will provide around 2-2.1x capacity based on the current usage patterns.
It is so sad to see either misinformed people continuing to spread lies, or users *sponsored by unknown actors* continuing to spread FUD and dissent. Here's a better view on the issue:  |
|
|
|
SegWit is an altcoin.
Wrong. Even franky1 realizes that this is far from the truth and the definition of an altcoin. While Segwit is far from being some perfect solution, it most surely is no altcoin. Here's a more healthier stance on the matter:  |
|
|
|
SegWit is used to fix the network so Lightning can be attached later. Lightning allows you to pay Blockstream for transactions rather than the miners.
Wrong. Lightning Network is open source, thus can be implemented by anyone. You are may be talking about Lightning Hubs which can be run by anyone. There are currently several different teams working on this, i.e. several different implementations. |
|
|
|
My apologies. I wanted to start a discussion and answer questions about cold storage solutions for new bitcoin users. I will remove the link to our website.
If you really want to help in that aspect, you can take a look at the thread created by Mitchell and me: [General] Bitcoin Wallets - Which, what, why?. Cold storage was only briefly covered as that was not the primary idea behind it. However, maybe you will have some suggestions regarding potential improvements. Newbie wallet questions pop up from time to time. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
