Yes, without boubt. If you are lucky enough to find the right coin you can buy one house with one signature. (Atleast one medium house 100k-150K € here in Italy on small town) Last example is this one https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2770283.0 but now after my report of mass abusing the spreadsheet it's gone.  The coin already did +1500% since ICO The bounty was 1.2M usd so even with a 20% for signature (I don't know the real value) someone with high rank now has probably (with the +1500%) more than 20/50k. Remember it's really hard to find the good coin, you need to be lucky. |
|
|
|
|
Nice work as always only one consideration.
The data on legendary and hero ranks are maybe infuinced by merit sources since the majority of them has those ranks.
Can you remove knowed sources from the graph?
Also is really hard to see one top sender sMerit with huge reciprocal merit with another user.
|
|
|
|
|
what if I have 15 k twitter and 5k facebook?
"You can participate only in one campaign, so choose correctly"
Do you mean overall of for each social media?
Can I apply for 2 ranks?
Rank 2 facebook and rank 3 twitter?
Also for rank 3 how many tweets/rt?
|
|
|
|
|
For sure mods have nothing better to do than read your posts 1 by one and delete them.
Someone is reporting you for spamming messages and mods delete them if they are spam. (or you posting on self moderate threads and OP delete them).
|
|
|
|
|
Can we have spreadsheet and % for each bounty? ty!
|
|
|
|
|
The negative score is bad, is not a coincidence that many sites have removed it.
The merit is something that is not equal to the "like" and the demerit is not equal to the "dislike"
If you don't want read a post, skip it or ignore/report the user if the post is bad and if instead you find it useful and well done use the +Merit.
Above all, dislike is easily exploitable by people with many other accounts.
But in the end I agree with you sMerit system maybe needs a little adjustement (more merit sources or reduction by 20-30%,in my opinion, to rank up) now we are in a moment when montly sMerit circulation is ≤ sMerit generated.
|
|
|
|
|
Hanno aggiunto una sorce in settimana:
There are 80 merit sources with a total merit generation of up to 18500 sMerit per 30 days.
Potrebbe essere comunque un mese storico questo, primo mese in cui lo sMerit usato sul forum è inferiore a quello generato.
|
|
|
|
This is most likely the equivalent of a clickfarm doing bounties. Don't get me wrong here, but it's part of the reason that decentralized checking for bounties is lacking at. There's no way to detect abuse when it's coming from the same user or group when there's no centralized platform bounty hunters have to go through.
Well they are in a lot of bounties, I'm not a bounty manager and I find a lot of abusers without looking for them, only reporting my reports and scroll down and up the page. My list of abusers is very long I found a lot of them and they are saved on my .txt file but since I'm not paid for it (cause is not my job) I will report them when I have time. It's really quite easy to discover them (It's "only a very very long work) and IDK how managers can't find them! |
|
|
|
I'm starting also to use this service. Yeah, I try to stay away from Google companies whenever I can. They are getting too big. They can track you over half the Internet.
~
Yes, watch this video if you want, it was on my "suggested video playlist" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zBnDWSvaQ1I |
|
|
|
I did this one. Keep in mind my English is not perfect so maybe you need to adjust the grammar. Original Italian https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3864505.msg37486269#msg37486269In rete trovi sicuramente spiegazioni meglio articolate però provo a darti una risposta "scientifica". La distribuzione di probabilità che meglio si addice all' estrazione di bitcoin è la bernoulliana quindi Probabilità di estrazione=n!/(n-k)!*p^k*(1-p)^(n-k) dove: n=numero di tentativi provati in 10 minuti->n=hashpower della rete totale*10minuti k=numero di tentativi accettabili->k=1 p=probabilità di successo-> hashpower delle tue macchine/hashpower della rete Puoi farti tranquillamente i conti precisi ma verrà una probabilità con 0 periodico praticamente  Questo perche n!/(n-1)! è praticamente 1 per via di n molto grande; p è dell' ordine di 10^-9 quindi 1-p è circa 0.999999 che elevato ad un numero molto grande è di un ordine minore di 10^-44 (basta vedere che 0.99999^(10^9) è dell' ordine di 10^-44 e considerare che n-1 invece è di un ordine enormemente superiore al miliardo). Quindi avrai un 10^-9 per un qualcosa di ordine molto piccolo quindi ad essere ottimisti avrai 0.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000012% di probabilità di minare il blocco. Buona fortuna English version https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4143120.msg38653646#msg38653646On the internet, you will definitely find better explanations, but I am trying to give you a "scientific" answer. The probability of distribution that is best matched to bitcoin extraction is the Bernoulli distribution, therefore Probability of extraction = n!/ (N-k)!*P^k*(1-p)^(n-k) where: n=number of tried attempts in 10 minutes ->n=hashpower of the total network*10minutes k=number of acceptable attempts->k=1 p=probability of success-> hashpower of your machines / hashpower of the network You can quietly do the math but it will result a probability with 0 periodically This is because n!/(n-1)! is practically 1 because of a big value of n; p is of the order of 10^-9 therefore 1-p is about 0.999999 which when raised to a very large number it will become in an order less than 10^-44 (just see that 0.99999^(10 ^ 9) is of the order of 10^-44 and consider that n-1 instead is of an order extremely superior to one billion). So you will have a 10^-9 multiplied for something with a very small order, so to be optimistic you will have 0.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 0000000000000000000000010000000000000000000000000000012% of probability to mining the block. Good luck . |
|
|
|
141. 105 (=105-0): nemya  |
|
|
|
~
You two don't understand how the merit system works. 500 alts would have 0 sMerit to give away. :/
I Know.... If I have not misunderstood in the Russian section, if I report a spammer with the "report to moderator" I have a chance to have a reward in Merit. From here, if I create 500 alts to spam and report them with my main account, I will increase my chances of having Merit. @eddie13, 500 is a symbolic number can be even 1, (but more is better for the newbie spam protection timer). I like this idea because I personaly report many messagges but it easy exploitable. I have no doubt about the goodness of the gesture of mod but I know the human tendency to turn the rules for a personal profit. |
|
|
|
E' un peccato però che il forum italiano venga penalizzato in questo modo.... ovviamente alla lunga ne risentirebbe la qualità di tutta la sezione "spingendo" gli utenti a postare sulla sezione internazionale e via via allontanandosi da questa.... sarebbe forse interessante far gestire i merit a parecchi utenti "legendary o hero".
Il problema è che devono fare apply e quasi nessuno l'ha fatta. |
|
|
|
Merit is not a good moderating reward in my opinion cause people can make 500 alts and boost reports on the main account |
|
|
|
|
I think it will go up again soon around 1k, still under the all time high but it was a pumped market that one. I think is really hard it goes to 400.
|
|
|
|
Why not then make a new additional rank for example : Bounty Manager, like the Copper Member. So only those ranked ones will be allowed to post in the bounty section.
There should be a procedure to apply for such position, based on different criteria,maybe same as the Merit sources today.
This will reduce the fake and scam projects and the spam too. Of course it makes everything more centralized.
I guess is too much time and work implementing those changes, and it will be easier just to remove the bounty section but, it's all about compromises.
Now that we have the merit system just limit the section to members+ and copper members is already a great solution to avoid the mass spam abusing on bounties. THE SCAMMER Guinness world record on bitcointalk 1 man 1000 accounts 150k+ usd! |
|
|
|
Done, long catch! Asking for retag here -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4317113.01st nuke https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.560He did new bitcointalk accounts but he uses the same twitter addresses, Tag them aswell Accounts Connected:Kmoris, RevolutioNz, bitlover07, Demon Hunter, BullDogHuskie, Tmcrypto, TomCarpenter, chopseyman, YellowMind, AldoCrawley, wolfinthestreet, LunaticMovement, GalenResty, TonyCharls, CriptoNill, greatthinker, hassan2654, C. GarnerProof:https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1wegIPZ4qW5VoDy0szvi_9IdwBHpv-dwpfEdWZQzsMTc/edit#gid=1088075924https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1whEnb-5VK14O7ktF3Tkm4pgmD3KJrhNjlBPvHhmNSqk/edit#gid=870962646https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1LbdvnW6Na90wfnmUxnK9BYsGqdOMbvHNcieSNgItaak/edit#gid=2069321837https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1AXv1k_dl6-BBRucENWuyIL4Yt-VeIbyW2vPNb31E8f4/edit#gid=1061003699Related Addresses:https://twitter.com/karamoris33
https://twitter.com/IL0veCrypto
https://twitter.com/jerrysmith252
https://twitter.com/JohnMark2585
https://twitter.com/SparkSun29
https://twitter.com/tonmoycrypto
https://twitter.com/jasonmattson99
https://twitter.com/justmonroereese
https://twitter.com/cryptonoel17
https://twitter.com/crypotofreak
https://twitter.com/ThisIsCryptoo
https://twitter.com/CryptoFreak24
https://twitter.com/GalenResty
https://twitter.com/Jasonomano12
https://twitter.com/millar1988
https://twitter.com/aidenfrankie
https://twitter.com/CryptoSaken
https://twitter.com/LifeSunder
0xD382c13b2FEB6c753d0565C4F8e2583ecBAbe144
0x12C8C54D1b62aF9e6623E7c647dfF822fc3Cf7d2
0xd4f5CFA13D37c52B1d967aa52550F9AeDc96829b
0xd1CBB2de9Aa13ffb99F20774BDA403afBedfccC8
0x86fbB300e8cf2e074a9DcA1F7d6776F82F9c23bF
0xAe7668449Ed968c5F28e73704Ec7aF79b3ce4F2D
0x7E5Ff33aB9F2D9BEf3EC2A327c4C7c1B155FDc80
0xb94e2470d5352E3b289c0a95C703706e4aB090f7
0xc5F0B96ed1ea7E28D026EE711163068B44259300
0x85011e9702F9220E06acafF6Ab5c9eCEdD0a5A29
0xb1762aCE33d7D4b65551A9E2DB21321527a807B4
0xDa3c192d17897d673ff7986cBa09C3c926663C63
0x63E4CbAdbc91e6c5a60488eb376324904aB84C0b
0x7e6574B16a5b9Ba992E1353c0C93aCC92AAccCe9
0x1edEe4d47Ba0CAF1688fC506ec989c65b565FCD2
0xC5eBc286C728A3B385A55E6d6B4c854bB4a781AF
0xfb071F292799f0D194bB0A637A122AB30b4eDa55
0xC37aCf56695B7D263a57004134D5D8583E66E4b3
Main address is 0xc6dc6bfdbf34a30458005e4a297ae85b7f3372dd suspended at the moment till he checks the bot  Also he is probably run more accounts now. |
|
|
|
- No one has made it to Legendary
- 8 to Hero (from Sr. Member)
- 33 to Sr. Member (from Full Member)
- 21 to Full Member (from scratch; two more than on a list I found yesterday with older creation dates), and another additional 53 to Full Member (from Jr. Member)
- 1.614 to Member (starting from Jr. Member or below).
Can we have a full list till full members? I think we can skip the Members. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
