|
I noticed RSI lacks the overbought/oversold parameter tweaks. Any chance they will be added?
|
|
|
|
When viewing RSI, it looks like the indicator scales out of the box and into the volume box.
Which market? ---- I see, the label is out of the box. The bug is fixed now. Is it possible to add a feature where we select if we want the green candle(also known as bullish candle) to be filled green inside, like the red one instead of being hollow? Or perhaps make it be filled green by default if the option will be too difficult. Usually candles on most platforms are filled inside regardless of type. Like so Because filled candlestick is not friendly for red green blindness and print, so it won't be changed until new theme added. For dark theme, hollow green is not good enough, especially when user zoom in the charts, I have plan to add a filled theme too. I am sorry, you didn't make much sense here. I use the dark theme primarily, so the hollow stick sometimes doesn't look good. You may be right about the red-green color blindness, I myself can't differentiate very specific red colors, but the bright red isn't a problem. In MetaTrader 4 one can change the candlestick however he likes, maybe you should add something like that? Actually at very beginning the charts is filled. Make candlestick hollow needs extra code. Also I wrote a filled version for comparing hollow and filled theme, finally I used hollow version and hide the filled version. Replace hollow theme is not possible as I expressed before. Add new theme, it will be an useless option for most of people. So the filled theme still won't be added currently. Useless, why? A lot of people use the filled ones. Shouldn't be too hard to add, the code is already there. |
|
|
|
When viewing RSI, it looks like the indicator scales out of the box and into the volume box.
Which market? ---- I see, the label is out of the box. The bug is fixed now. Is it possible to add a feature where we select if we want the green candle(also known as bullish candle) to be filled green inside, like the red one instead of being hollow? Or perhaps make it be filled green by default if the option will be too difficult. Usually candles on most platforms are filled inside regardless of type. Like so Because filled candlestick is not friendly for red green blindness and print, so it won't be changed until new theme added. For dark theme, hollow green is not good enough, especially when user zoom in the charts, I have plan to add a filled theme too. I am sorry, you didn't make much sense here. I use the dark theme primarily, so the hollow stick sometimes doesn't look good. You may be right about the red-green color blindness, I myself can't differentiate very specific red colors, but the bright red isn't a problem. In MetaTrader 4 one can change the candlestick however he likes, maybe you should add something like that? |
|
|
|
When viewing RSI, it looks like the indicator scales out of the box and into the volume box.
Which market? ---- I see, the label is out of the box. The bug is fixed now. Is it possible to add a feature where we select if we want the green candle(also known as bullish candle) to be filled green inside, like the red one instead of being hollow? Or perhaps make it be filled green by default if the option will be too difficult. Usually candles on most platforms are filled inside regardless of type. Like so  |
|
|
|
|
And make Satoshi the richest being on the planet, or group. They would literally have the ability to buy the planet.
|
|
|
|
The way I see it, to get 10WUs I would need 100 days, because the ETA on my WU is 10 days.
A 13000 on my GTX780 runs around 12 hours, under Ubuntu. A dedicated system doing nothing else. Do you have anything else running on your system ? FAH only use unused resources on your PC. If there is BOINC in addition that would impact. Or screensaver/energy saver ? Can you share the log file ? As I've said before, nothing else. |
|
|
|
I would discourage the use of abbreviations(namely, QRB) because a lot of people here have never folded thus have no idea what you are talking about.
Fair enough: QRB Quick Return Bonus Each project has a base point assigned and requirements on timelines determined on a reference system in Stanford. If your system can deliver faster you get based on a formula a higher (muuuuch higher) credit on points. But this require a qualified passkey (e.g 80% successful returned WU, initially 10). More here http://folding.stanford.edu/home/faq/faq-points/#ntoc9The way I see it, to get 10WUs I would need 100 days, because the ETA on my WU is 10 days. |
|
|
|
And please: do not just delete started work units.
Those WU are sequential in nature and if one got stopped the subsequent WUs can't be created and research get delayed. Once a WU is started please finish it ! also if you get less points.
If this is done to often it will harm this coin with respect to its reputation.
Oh, and it might harm the status of your own passkey as you need to keep a 80% success rate on returned WU to keep the QRB
I would discourage the use of abbreviations(namely, QRB) because a lot of people here have never folded thus have no idea what you are talking about. |
|
|
|
Why your folding power isn't on full ? It took almost 1-2hours for all my rigs PPD to kick in, i would just give it some time. Alright, but I doubt it would change anything, it has already been nearly 10 minutes and the speed is still 1679PPD and as you saw, another user has the same problem.
Before I posted here, I did wait over an hour, it was the same speed and didn't change at all. Here is a screenshot as of NOW.  Because it doesn't seem to affect anything. I was running on Full for over an hour. |
|
|
|
It took almost 1-2hours for all my rigs PPD to kick in, i would just give it some time. Alright, but I doubt it would change anything, it has already been nearly 10 minutes and the speed is still 1679PPD and as you saw, another user has the same problem.
Before I posted here, I did wait over an hour, it was the same speed and didn't change at all. Here is a screenshot as of NOW. |
|
|
|
|
Alright, but I doubt it would change anything, it has already been nearly 10 minutes and the speed is still 1679PPD and as you saw, another user has the same problem.
|
|
|
|
For those of you seeing exactly 1679 PPD, what is your TPF and what project were you assigned? Are you on Core_17 WUs?  Estimate TPF 2hrs 26minutes Fahcore 0x17 Exact same stuff. You can try erasing your current work units and download new ones and see if that makes a difference. How? delete the folders here C:\Users\your computer\AppData\Roaming\FAHClient\work I deleted it, restarted everything, but same thing. Erm, then 2 last things, 1) I remember reading that if you have like 6 GPUs and only a dual core CPU system, the CPU will be the bottleneck. So try not to fold on the CPU and see what happens. 2) Leave is for 1 hour and see if the PPD goes up. I have, left it before for over an hour, same thing. My CPU is an i5-4670k, and I am also not folding on it, so there is no bottleneck. |
|
|
|
For those of you seeing exactly 1679 PPD, what is your TPF and what project were you assigned? Are you on Core_17 WUs? Estimate TPF 2hrs 26minutes Fahcore 0x17 Exact same stuff. You can try erasing your current work units and download new ones and see if that makes a difference. How? delete the folders here C:\Users\your computer\AppData\Roaming\FAHClient\work I deleted it, restarted everything, but same thing. |
|
|
|
For those of you seeing exactly 1679 PPD, what is your TPF and what project were you assigned? Are you on Core_17 WUs? Estimate TPF 2hrs 26minutes Fahcore 0x17 Exact same stuff. You can try erasing your current work units and download new ones and see if that makes a difference. How? |
|
|
|
For those of you seeing exactly 1679 PPD, what is your TPF and what project were you assigned? Are you on Core_17 WUs? Estimate TPF 2hrs 26minutes Fahcore 0x17 Exact same stuff. |
|
|
|
For those of you seeing exactly 1679 PPD, what is your TPF and what project were you assigned? Are you on Core_17 WUs? As far as I see, FahCore is 0x17, my TPF is 2 hrs 26m, Project 13000. But you already know this, I told you this on IRC. |
|
|
|
I got a rig with 5870's and each 5870 is showing 17000 ppd, is that ok? Any ideas why some of us only get 1679PPD on some GPUs?
How long have you been waiting? Really took about 20-30 minutes for two of my three GPUs to start getting 90%+ utilization. Now they are running constant at about 96% average and estimated at 68,000 PPD each. Hours? My 5850 is doing only 1679PPD and has 99% Utilization. No CPU folding. The 5850 isn't that far behind the 5870, I should be getting higher, with Core15 2 years ago people were doing 8k with the 5850. I think I also have the problem with the 5870. |
|
|
|
Any ideas why some of us only get 1679PPD on some GPUs?
How long have you been waiting? Really took about 20-30 minutes for two of my three GPUs to start getting 90%+ utilization. Now they are running constant at about 96% average and estimated at 68,000 PPD each. Hours? My 5850 is doing only 1679PPD and has 99% Utilization. No CPU folding. |
|
|
|
|
Any ideas why some of us only get 1679PPD on some GPUs?
|
|
|
|
The official website has protection system, great coins from great to little drops, strict
wtf does that even mean?! It means he failed English classes. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
