The only way is to either reinstated the 5 mil then distribute it proportional to the investment or to reduce the premine to 3% of new total coin supply.
You keep going on about the premine and it is irrelevant. There is no incentive for the dev team to dump when they have built services that depend on the success of CLD. I rather an upfront and transparent premine than some hidden premine. If the premine is that much of a concern for you then don't invest. The premine is never irrelevant. There is always incentive to dump, it is called "money". And I am actually a bit confused by in what way the services depend on the price of XCLD? Can you elaborate? Nobody is saying they would rather trade an upfront premine for a hidden one, so I don't know why that comparison comes up... Nobody is saying to get rid of the premine either, but rather to reduce it to the amount that it was originally intended to be. It still says 3% in the OP. "(3%) (with the initial 5m) (we have to wait in till the end of the ico to see what amounts get destroyed for a final %)". That is confusing. At the very least change the OP to reflect the current situation so as not to mislead potential investors. It should say something along the lines of "15% or greater depending on how many coins are destroyed after the ICO." Btw you look like a shill being a newbie and having never posted on here except in this thread- only in response to criticisms- with overtly one-sided comments. Everyone with a new account isn't a shill. If the premine is a issue for you then don't invest. They shouldn't have to change their business plan because one or two people do not agree. The only part of my comment you really respond to is the part where I point out that you look like a shill... I didn't say everyone with a new account is a shill, I pointed out that the fact that you are new, have only commented on this thread, and only in response to "FUD" with purely positive comments is suspicious. Okay, don't change the business plan- but change the OP to reflect reality. Oh and I promise you more than one or two people are apprehensive about the premine/IPO combo. "And I am actually a bit confused by in what way the services depend on the price of XCLD? Can you elaborate?" Care to elaborate? The profit sharing plan is awesome, but why is it restricted only to ICO investors? Post-ICO buying and holding would be incentivized if people were allowed to participate at that point. On the other-hand, if you can't participate it will be a deterrent to buy after the ICO. Why would anybody buy and hold large amounts after the ICO when they know they are missing out on a key benefit of being a large holder? |
|
|
|
The only way is to either reinstated the 5 mil then distribute it proportional to the investment or to reduce the premine to 3% of new total coin supply.
You keep going on about the premine and it is irrelevant. There is no incentive for the dev team to dump when they have built services that depend on the success of CLD. I rather an upfront and transparent premine than some hidden premine. If the premine is that much of a concern for you then don't invest. The premine is never irrelevant. There is always incentive to dump, it is called "money". And I am actually a bit confused by in what way the services depend on the price of XCLD? Can you elaborate? Nobody is saying they would rather trade an upfront premine for a hidden one, so I don't know why that comparison comes up... Nobody is saying to get rid of the premine either, but rather to reduce it to the amount that it was originally intended to be. It still says 3% in the OP. "(3%) (with the initial 5m) (we have to wait in till the end of the ico to see what amounts get destroyed for a final %)". That is confusing. At the very least change the OP to reflect the current situation so as not to mislead potential investors. It should say something along the lines of "15% or greater depending on how many coins are destroyed after the ICO." Btw you look like a shill being a newbie and having never posted on here except in this thread with overtly one-sided comments. Donīt get mad man, look at this: "150,000 CLD will be allocated for bounties. (3%) (with the initial 5m) (we have to wait in till the end of the ico to see what amounts get destroyed for a final %)" They will reduce the premine when the ico ends. Yeah I saw that, it is quoted in my comment.. 3% should not be stated as it is completely irrelevant and misleading now. The minimum premine is now 15%. |
|
|
|
The only way is to either reinstated the 5 mil then distribute it proportional to the investment or to reduce the premine to 3% of new total coin supply.
You keep going on about the premine and it is irrelevant. There is no incentive for the dev team to dump when they have built services that depend on the success of CLD. I rather an upfront and transparent premine than some hidden premine. If the premine is that much of a concern for you then don't invest. The premine is never irrelevant. There is always incentive to dump, it is called "money". And I am actually a bit confused by in what way the services depend on the price of XCLD? Can you elaborate? Nobody is saying they would rather trade an upfront premine for a hidden one, so I don't know why that comparison comes up... Nobody is saying to get rid of the premine either, but rather to reduce it to the amount that it was originally intended to be. It still says 3% in the OP. "(3%) (with the initial 5m) (we have to wait in till the end of the ico to see what amounts get destroyed for a final %)". That is confusing. At the very least change the OP to reflect the current situation so as not to mislead potential investors. It should say something along the lines of "15% or greater depending on how many coins are destroyed after the ICO." Btw you look like a shill being a newbie and having never posted on here except in this thread- only in response to criticisms- with overtly one-sided comments. |
|
|
|
|
Yeah it is misleading in the OP, it still says 3%. And a premine of 13% or even much greater is very unsettling. That's a greater than or equal to 13% premine on top of a less than or equal to 100 BTC IPO..
|
|
|
|
Im concerned about the rest of the coins are really the dev held or destroyed??
exactly! what is the point of destroying. they will probably sell it, this shit stinks. PRICE IS WAY TO HIGH you will never get profits out of this. A marketcap of 118.45 BTC is too high? I think you are too high  That's around 70,000 USD marketcap, that is tiny if this coin comes through on what it says it will do. |
|
|
|
|
Interesting coin. Following.
|
|
|
|
I might be shooting my own leg here but
Isn't the ICO priced too low?
I've compared it with VIA, took into consideration number of coins available instantly on the market, looked at the things in the pipeline. Should the initial price be more like 3000 satoshi?
Not to mention this coin will actually have some of its features ready at launch. Viacoin is currently nothing more than any other scrypt coin, but hopefully that will change soon. |
|
|
|
What was the original price of Crypti, based on the IPO?
0.0000850.0000085 you missed a zero. My fault, sorry... by my math i paid .00000882 did i get ripped off  ? I believe it varied slightly depending on which day you bought in, as there was a small decreasing bonus over time. |
|
|
|
|
Yeah, looks like there could be some free loading scammers trying to sneak their way into the distribution now that they see how well it went.. None of them have ever posted in this thread prior, none of them have provided proof that they were ever in the distriubtion (I, for example, posted on here that I sent coins and also sent and saved the PM with my tx ID from an address of mine that I can sign), and they are all newb or jr accounts.
|
|
|
|
I don't believe all these newb accounts coming here claiming they were in the list.. Interesting how they have never posted in this thread until now  |
|
|
|
|
Chang still here? I thought he started an investigation with ASIC a few weeks back now... If he has evidence that this is a scam and ASIC has/will found/find it to be a scam then what the hell is he still doing here trying to convince simple altcoin traders? How the hell is the opinion of traders on btctalk going to matter if ASIC were to find and announce it to be a scam and purse legal recourse? Why is he still wasting so much time and energy here when he claims to already have it in the bag? Why not just sit back and wait for ASIC to do it's work, Chang? Unless..... ??
And it's not as though you are trying to protect us traders anymore. You have made it perfectly clear the level of disdain you have for us, and that you give less than two shits if people who are still in it at this point lose out. I'm pretty sure you have even said you would like to see us lose everything at this point. So, why are you still here? If you have it in the bag and Uro will be brought down by ASIC soon, then why are you still here?
|
|
|
|
Hey Bosman
Still waiting on my coins. I was a 16x investor, address is in sig: LhBFQFL4uSaYrbnPNAz3RE4kJxe9NygGtx
I understand these things take time, just wanted to make sure though!
Thanks
Cool! Just taking a 15 min break and ill sort it out! Grueling evening Got my coins, sorry for bugging. Thank you! |
|
|
|
|
Hey Bosman
Still waiting on my coins. I was a 16x investor, address is in sig: LhBFQFL4uSaYrbnPNAz3RE4kJxe9NygGtx
I understand these things take time, just wanted to make sure though!
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Bryce Weiner's thinking is flawed to begin with. It is not the farmer who takes risk with Uro, it is the seller of the urea. The farmers won't buy or receive Uro to dump it on the market, rather they will buy it so they can trade it for urea. And since the Uro Protocol specifies that one Uro = 1 mt of urea, the actual market price does not affect the farmers. The distributors are the ones who need the market value to be on par with 1 mt of urea and for there to be adequate liquidity in order to cash out the Uro they received in payment.
|
|
|
|
Phheeww! Must feel good to be an early adopter To those of you who joined the free participation early, thank you. You have been rewarded as I have locked further free participation. If you'd like to add more shares you can participate in the Donate/ICO. More news to come this week... Don't wait too long! I will join the donate ICO let's hope all the freebie peeps don't go and dump it cheap..Also do you give any little free bounties to promoters? I want to do a blog review and also my Hubby can translate the OP into Mandarin Chinese. So if I purchase a share package would I als be able to receive a little share package for our services to help spread the coin news? . They'll have every incentive to hold! What incentive is that? I'm interested in the ICO but the fact that people got coins for free does concern me. |
|
|
|
 Bryce Weiner @BryceWeiner · 16h Aw man... $URO is dumping before I wrote my article for Monday. just thought id put his tweet up. I sense more FUD.  update. Bryce Weiner @BryceWeiner 9m I sent my $URO article to @d_seaman for editing. Lets hope this is positive!. Ooh yay an opinion piece by BW... I doubt there will be a single piece of new information in this article, it will just be BW spewing his overrated opinion. |
|
|
|
The prim donna spelling police have come out, but your BOTH wrong! http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/yourPicking out spelling mistakes is the first sign you have them on the ropes! Goodluck you little kids, no wonder they get away with it so easy. It is 'you're'. A contraction of you + are. Not your, your is a possessive as your link says. |
|
|
|
Presale public ledger is now available! We may add some things to this, if people have requests pls shout em out!  please dispaly the investors name Lol good joke. |
|
|
|
|
Yup, this looks eerily similar to Blackcoin. I called this out when Wiz and IconicExpert got involved. History tends to repeat itself.
It should be noted though that the ethereum IPO is likely sucking BTC out of just about every market today. I still can't believe how much money is being thrown at that thing... I'm going to guess a LOT of people will get burned on ethereum. I mean, did people even read the clause in their disclaimer which states they have no legal obligation to complete the project?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
