Thanks, we've already installed! But... we cant open the Wallet with a seed... Last time I used Electrum in October, and now I just cant open two my Wallets!!! If somebody even stolen my money, then I could open the wallet?
Why my vallet dont even opens at all?
What are you trying to do? So, Electrum is opening normally? The issue happens when you try to open an already existent wallet file or restore your wallet through the wizard with the seed? What exactly happens?
|
|
|
Thanks!
Maybe can somebody help me step by step how to install the Electrum on Linux? Do you know is there any detailed instruction?
Literally posted above. Just run these commands. Or if you really want a video: https://youtu.be/6EVmp8gAqYAAlso, stop creating multiple threads. A single one is enough.
|
|
|
Works good over here, nice. Maybe a euro to btc version could be added. Curious what is used as the source to pull the price from ?
I'm using bitcoinaverage.com's API. Works good over here, nice. Maybe a euro to btc version could be added. Curious what is used as the source to pull the price from ?
Done. Now there is an ticker option (default is USD). Since I noticed I would need to start adding a lot of params (like/this/and/it/would/be/huge/and/weird), I've added it as a query param (?ticker=USD). Example:https://btc.ninjastic.space/price/1250/ff0000?ticker=EURYou can use USD, EUR, AUR, BRL, etc...
|
|
|
The images that you posted above shows as invalid image for me. I use Brave with dnscrypt btw. Not sure if the problem is on my end or the code.
Can you try again? Maybe it was because I enables HTTPS but forgot to change my urls. (also try ctrl + f5 to clear your browser’s cache) It’s showing up fine for me. For suggestions, do you have any plans for the other features other than the one for checking balance? Like: https://btc-priceimg.herokuapp.com/img/10.00/00f
I understand that yours is supposed to be for SegWit support and the above command is kinda irrelevant but, having all-in-one tool can be useful. I also think that you should make the font in the image a little bit bigger. It’s not irrelevant. I can work on that. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) It also makes sense since I named it "Bitcoin Price Image".
|
|
|
I've made my own "bitcoin balance image" server that also supports Segwit addresses (bech32 included). In case you want to use in your script.
Images aren't displayed. Hmm... it’s working here. Can you try opening it directly?
|
|
|
-snio-
Scams are not moderated. Just tag them and move on. No one should be that naive to give any of them a loan, but they can keep trying.
|
|
|
I've made my own "bitcoin balance image" server that also supports Segwit addresses (bech32 included). In case you want to use in your script. https://btc.ninjastic.space/balance/ADDRESS/COLOR (color is optional) With color:
|
|
|
Yobit isnt even paying, they cant help that idiots keep wearing it on the hopes of getting paid. Its not yobits fault that people keep wearing the signatures
Are you sure? I may be wrong, but I remember an user saying that he got a payment (that was after the ban ended out).
|
|
|
No, that would make sense if the user actually went to the website manually from the browser and downloaded a fake wallet. That would be as dumb as downloading it from a porn website. But the response from the server was manipulated from the official electrum wallet they were using. My only concern is, the chances of such hacks happening again in the future are high and newbies will be the primary victims since not many know that they can be hacked within an official wallet. Maybe someone should write proper step-by-step instructions on setting electrum up which newbies can refer to.
Unless... he verified his wallet files... We need to tell them to make an habit on verifying their files REGARDLESS of from where he downloaded the files from. If it was from a link that popped up in the official wallet, a random website, or if satoshi himself came to his house to give him a file. It doesn’t matter. VERIFY.
|
|
|
At this stage, I don't think suggesting Electrum as a primary wallet for newbies who have no prior experience in verifying downloads or aren't that technically sound may result in them losing funds. I'm talking about this scam : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5129118.0 and newbies are still a victim of this. Maybe a much simpler offline wallet could be an alternative. ? The user downloaded a fake Electrum from http://goelectrum.comIf he knew how to verify a file signature, he could have downloaded it from a porn website that he would knew the file was fake. I think that’s a better approach than simple telling the user to not use the wallet after all.
|
|
|
I don't know if Apple is any better, as they probably read your emails as well. We are fuked up.. let's do what we can to preserve our privacy.. About proton mail, as least you should create an account there with a cool account name while it's still a small company. I have a few emails there ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) See this list for good privacy-oriented email providers: https://www.privacytools.io/providers/email/ProtonMail seems to be one of the "bests" of the list. I use them as well.
|
|
|
Problem solved. I was able to send the funds to another address from my blockchain.com wallet without my password. The address I had imported into blockchain.com was not read-only.
So... I'm asuming you had the private key and used it to import the address, right? Glad to hear that. I recommend that you create a new wallet (preferably with a trusted desktop wallet, like Electrum), SAVE YOUR BACKUP SEED, and move your coins to it. Make sure to verify your file signature to make sure they are legit: https://bitcoinelectrum.com/how-to-verify-your-electrum-download/
|
|
|
Não abusa. ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) Gostaria de saber o motivo do banimento. O @vito05 não postavam spam. Será que não foi por causa de alguma campanha de assinatura ? Lembro que muitos que colocaram a campanha da Yobit foi banido sem justificativas. Tem que tomar cuidado com assinaturas. Muita patrulha. Só foram banidos aqueles que tiveram pelo menos 1 report válido enquanto usavam a assinatura da Yobit. Agora, já que foi totalmente possível ter "falsos-positivos" ali no meio (tanto que teve pelo menos um), o usuário poderia ter apenas criado outra conta pra contestar seu ban (como aconteceu). Outra coisa, o ban do Yobit foi de apenas (se eu não me engano) 1 ou 2 semanas para os usuários com 1 report (e 60 dias para a assinatura em sí). O ban do vit05 foi permanente, então eu chutaria que foi por plagiarismo - já que aconteceu no momento em que um usuário criou um bot pra detectar plagiarismo nos posts e causou um banimento em massa de vários usuários (inclusive usuários "famosos"). E como ele não contestou, provavelmente foi um ban válido.
|
|
|
We did not write this, read carefully. Word manually we haven't used anywhere. We wrote: We generate guarantee letters on others computers that are not connected to the Internet after creating an order within 5-10 minutes.
I assumed that because how else would you do that if the computer isn’t connected to the internet? Isn’t that how air gapped computers/cold wallets work? Also, why would it take 5-10 minutes if not that way?
|
|
|
É outro “bot de trading”. Acontece que uns sócios da empresa liberaram umas conversas com o “CEO” da empresa falando que nunca teve arbitragem e que dos supostos 120 BTC investidos pelos usuários, so havia 20 BTC na carteira. O CEO (que aparenta ser um sociopata meio alterado) teria então pago um laranja pra armar ter comprado a empresa, tirando o dele da reta pra quando tudo caísse. Mega TLDR ai. Edit: trading bot e não arbitragem
|
|
|
|