In most cases it is quite simple:
Step 1) Stop participaing in signature campaigns while creating posts of low quality.
Step 2) PM the person that left the rating (that would be me in this case).

---

Alternatively, if you "promise" to improve I could switch it to neutral which would put you on my watch list.

You're looking at the wrong places tonight: 58552.5 Indian Rupees per Bitcoin on Unocoin. This equals to:

Correct. Only members that a newbies or below (brand new) can be nuked. Unfortunately, I can not do anything here.

~Lauda

No, I am not. Just wondering what these are and why they're priced as is.

You can do so as advised by the person above me.

Tags for account trading, spamming and such are valid. I do not condone this type of behavior and thus do not trust anyone who engages in them. Simple as that.

That price estimator is a joke (the post analysis is even worse, it's just a very simple method that has zero analytical capabilities).

How exactly do you think that I've stumbled upon this account specifically out of thousands accounts? There is zero reason for me to lie about this. I did not even know that you, knightkon, existed on this forum prior to you sending me a PM.

Of course I did. People tend to sell me bullshit stories all the time. You did not even link to the loan, did you? There was really no reason to jump out in public like this with a blatant lie (as in the thread title). I always give people a chance to resolve/improve after rating (as I do with sig. spammers).

I can not know every account being sold, can I? Some fall for the methods that I use, while others do not.

My ratings were not visible by default until some time ago (as I got added to DT2). There was little reason to tag accounts at that time as those ratings had little-to-no effect. I was willing to work this out, but you seem rather very aggressive which makes me less inclined to help you out. FYI: DT1/2 members can *negate* my rating if they think it is invalid. A few DT members have read/responded in this thread and have not acted on it, which leads me to believe that they indirectly either support or accept it.

Could you post some pictures please? What about escrow?

If you're targeting:
1) Trust abuse (blatant and obvious one, e.g. "fuck you")
2) Unresolved trust by inactive members.
Then this idea may not be that bad. However, keep in mind that solving the secondary problem can be done by contacting the DT1 people that keep the DT2 account in their list.

---

In most other cases this will likely backfire. Something like this is really prone to abuse and bias.

Nice find. Everything leads me to believe that they are definitely connected. I've been checking my list, and it seems that all of those were enrolled in Bitmixer at some point. I have tagged every account for severe abuse of signature campaigns. I've already updated all of my lists and added those to the permanent blacklist.

That account was being auctioned off by a newbie (do not question my methods though).

Being a staff member has nothing to do with the feedback system and vice-versa (although you can be both).

I have in no way or form scammed you nor is that account worth 0.2+.

---

PSA: I am not targeting accounts that are collateral. OP did not even link to the actual loan/default. Are you attempting an act of calumny here? Because this is a blatant lie.
P.S. You quoted my PMs twice.

This topic has been moved to Meta.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1682504.0

Changes have to be slow, otherwise we are in for a ETH-like disaster where the only two choices are: 1) Accept a huge loss. 2) Become a bailout coin.

What are you talking about? Segwit has nothing to do with smart contracts. Look for Rootstock, that's where your smart contracts currently are/will be.

What exactly are you worried about? Segwit is the most peer reviewed change to date.

When was the last time that you had access to this account? In most cases, if you can't sign a message, there is nothing that we can do.

There exactly isn't much proof to go by for now, I've left a neutral rating.

FYI I'm anti-ponzi's in general. If there are plenty of such threads in that section, then you could request a sub-board (you should probably add some stats e.g. from the first 2-3 pages). However, even if there was a fair number of those, I wouldn't count on it as there are some more pressing issues IMO (but you can always try).

~Lauda

The full path is: Bitcoin Forum > Economy > Marketplace > Gambling > Investor-based games
Everything in these sections is primarily *bitcoin only*. It would be strange to have a mixture of Bitcoin and bitcoin+alts nested sections in long paths.

There is no sub-section for altcoin ponzi investments, only for Bitcoin ones.

This topic has been moved to Trashcan.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1681666.0

Just read the whole link:
There are other ways of improving this, but those aren't technological (e.g. running some sort of *action* to raise awareness and get people to consolidate their outputs).

Hold up a second, is this a *new* website or was this around last year as well? I don't see any positive trust-ratings on your profile, which is what I'd expect to see if you had created this website sometime in the past.

---

I'm considering spending a couple hundred bucks at least to run some upgrades, thus there is importance in such a website.

It be a dead address e.g.

Nothing of any importance. Why is this even a question? Almost all of the answers will be pure speculation. This is the standard dust spam with or without public notes. Nothing to see here.

Nobody can answer this question unless there is exact on either or both of the addresses.