For everybody's understanding, I am 'heavy' into HEAT (from my personal perspective) and certainly hope for success to the project team. I assume the trading function and current process was setup based on the scary events around Mt Gox/ lack of reliable exchanges etc. These were good considerations in the past sure! However, the space has moved on, that's all I am saying. Although Coinbase and co have their daily set of bashers, I agree with the former poster. Most new potential investors in this space >95% of the overall potential ->will likely overlook HEAT for another public altcoin with a strong promoter. Life is not fair and it's not the best technical solution that necessarily wins.

Good luck and peace everyone!

Actually, what I REALLY meant is that the Heatwallet's trading function is actually a distraction/ misconstrued - leading to wrong allocation of project resources. Sure, it's functionality covers Forging but it's not necessary anymore to have a separate trading platform. And to process BTC withdrawals manually is not a viable process with in a small team. Pls take my word for it and get listed on a third party exchange.

Please don't take this in the wrong way - but with the very low turnover in the Heatwallet and the huge spreads, I would wait a bit with these types of announcements I also think it would be good to list asap on Bittrex or any other public exchange ASAP.

Good luck!

Who do I contact at HEAT in regards to setting up an investor relations mgmt and social media strategy? My impression (with all due respect) is that the team is mainly focused on the technical stuff... Yes, participation in a domestic exhibition in Finland is of course a positive thing but I am talking about several urgent actions that should be undertaken asap! Do an interview on Kitco, get a reference on Zerohedge or Market Oracle or set up a dedicated named YouTube channel. Time to wake up folks! The competition with weaker technical solutions is already 150% active in this area.