SegWit is the compromise. It increases the block size to 4MB, for no other reason than that people kept asking for it. But it seems nobody actually wants the block size increase after all, and the big-blockers were all full of hot air. No matter. If SegWit fails to gain support in its current form, it can always be re-proposed without the controversial block size increase.
opposite is true...except for blockstream and bitfury and dcg...no one really wants segwit.
Good ol big blocker shill lies.
The poll done by 21 suggest that around 75% of big players in the space want segwit and the 70.5% reject Buggy Unlimited explicitly:
https://medium.com/@21/using-21-to-survey-blockchain-personalities-on-the-bitcoin-hard-fork-1953c9bcb8edNot to mention nobody but Roger Ver runs nodes.
So it's pretty obvious BU is in general a failure.
UASF is working, nobody is talking about BU anymore. We are now in the acceptance phase. Everyone knows segwit is going to activated, the question now is how.
The next step is for certain miners to accept segwit as a softfork to end the covert ASICBOOST exploit, if certain miners do not cooperate, UASF will keep going up.
Accept reality or get burned.
wow 61 random votes xd . why is this relevant for the comunity?