Litecoin is 100% legit, and there are many things in the works which will help it continue to grow stronger.  And I highly doubt the LCC team would have chosen Litecoin as the coin to split if they didn't actually feel it was credible.  After all, who's gonna spilt a crap coin?

As a volunteer with the Litecoin Foundation, I can tell you that Charlie Lee (along with others) are very actively involved in seeing Litecoin develop and grow.  Anyone that is only buying LTC for the LCC split and plans to sell LTC after will be missing out on the best to come.

That's what I'd like to know as well.

I believe you can run just 2 of the hashboards, although you may be pushing things a little with a 1000W psu.  I have a AWP3++ connected to 2 hashboards and the power supply, and a second psu running the 3rd hashboard.  Just the 2 boards and power supply alone are pulling about 950 watts.

This may be the comment of the century!  Man, I don't mean to laugh but this is some funny shit!

Wow.

I responded to a comment on Reddit. 

To echo my comments on Reddit - While any ICO comes with risks, I am impressed with the way DCORP has set up their incentive structure with the goal of preserving token value, as well as the structure that allows token holders to have votes in business decisions.

As per the whitepaper, the team members have a lock-up period on the tokens they receive, which are distributed (created) in 3 phases starting 1 year after deployment through the 4th year.

I emailed the founder with a couple of questions and received a response in a timely manner.  As per the founder's comments regarding the team incentive structure:

"This is all done to ensure token holders that we will do everything within our power to increase the value of DRP and prevent dumping. Please also note that not a single DRP token was given away for free, we’ve chosen to pay for all bounties and marketing by investing our own ETH and BTC."

That amount worked for me on my purchase.  If not, the transaction will be cancelled anyway, as it was when I first sent with 21000.

Does the DCORP team have a lock-up period on any tokens they receive?

Thanks.  I was able to adjust the gas based on what others were using and it worked.  The Ledger wallet did not let me change the gas amount from 21000 but was able to change it through myetherwallet.

Hi, I tried sending an ETH from my Ledger wallet to DCORP and the transaction on etherscan says "error - out of gas". 

The gas amount from my Ledger wallet showed 21000.

I am not familiar with the 'gas' thing.  Can anyone tell me what I need to do when I resend to make sure it goes through next time?

Thanks.

Thanks for the response.  So if I understand correctly: If I received say 5 separate deposits, regardless of whether they all came into one address or into multiple addresses, it would still be the same amount of inputs (and therefore same transaction size) if I send all of these deposits to another wallet in a single transaction?

I just recently sent some BTC from a wallet to cold storage, and it pulled the BTC from 3 different wallet address in order to get the amount I wanted to send.  The total transaction size showed 668 bytes, roughly 3 times the typical size.  Because of this, the fee I paid was over $4.

Is it normal that each wallet address that BTC is pulled from adds approx. 220 bytes to the transaction size?

I know that new wallet addresses are often generated for each deposit for privacy/security reasons, but from a fee standpoint wouldn't it cost a lot less to reuse a wallet address more than once?  This way, when money is sent from the wallet it's less likely to need to pull from so many addresses?

Thanks for the detailed response.  I got lucky and was able to get my transaction accelerated through viabtc, and it was confirmed an hour or so later.  Good to know how to handle CPFP if I need to do this in the future although it's frustrating that Glidera is still not including an appropriate fee, especially since they do not give the user any control over this.

Also been waiting on purchase transactions from Glidera that were suppose to arrive days ago.  No response from support.  Would be interested to know if anyone else has purchased through Glidera recently and has had delays receiving their deposits.

I'm using the BitPay wallet.  I've been trying to use the accelerator but am continually getting the message "Submissions are beyond limit. Please try later." 

According to the blockchain, it shows the fee being 140 sat/B, so it sounds like that should not be the issue.

I will give the accelerator a shot.  If that doesn't work and I want to try CPFP, can anyone confirm if I need to spend ALL of the unspent funds or can I just spend a portion of it?

Also, since this transaction was a BTC purchase through the Glidera exchange, does anyone know what would happen if the transaction does not get confirmed and gets kicked back out?  I understand how it works when sending someone else BTC, but wasn't sure how it would work with an exchange purchase transaction.  The money (via ACH) was pulled out of my account many days ago.

Thanks.

Hello,

New forum member and have a couple of questions regarding using CPFP on a transaction that's been stuck:

I purchased some BTC through Glidera which was sent to my BitPay app and has been unconfirmed for over 36 hours.  The fee that Glidera used is .0003164 BTC, which is not enough for timely transactions based on the current volume. On my previous purchase with Glidera they used this same fee, which resulted in a 5 hour wait time for that transaction to confirm. I contacted support at that time and was told that they amended their fee due to the congestion/delays and that I should not expect these delays in the future. Clearly the fee was not changed, which is very frustrating as I made additional purchases based on this understanding.

I would like to attempt a CPFP and send some of the unconfirmed funds from my Bitpay wallet to another wallet by using a higher priority fee setting on BitPay, but I have the following questions if anyone is able to help:

1. With CPFP, do I need to spend ALL of the unconfirmed funds, or just make sure that SOME of the uncomforted funds are being used?

2. I understand that I need to make sure a high enough fee is being paid to cover both transactions, but do I also factor in the .0003164 BTC on the unconfirmed transaction as part of the total amount when considering how much more to send ? In other words, if I wanted to make sure the fee on each transaction was .0004164 BTC, would I send 2x this amount, or would I send .0004164 BTC for the child transaction plus an additional 0.0001 BTC for the parent transaction (since .0003164 is already included in the original transaction)?

I guess I am just trying to understand if a miner looks at this from the standpoint that it's 2 transactions and wants a fee high enough on each (i.e. 2x what it would be on a single transaction)?  Or is it looked at as a single transaction, were I would want to include a higher fee than what I would normally pay one a single transaction, but not necessarily 2x what I would pay on a single transaction? Hope that makes sense.

For reference, the transaction I am referring is: https://blockchain.info/tx/8f46d46df82a4200e86e485653d725eab567043bbb008688aff964ab26db6197

Thanks in advance for any help with these questions.