|
Reserved Klingon translation.
|
|
|
|
I'm in to purchase one but don't have the power available for 5.  Please let me know if I can purchase just one unit from you. |
|
|
|
Have been trying to consolidate using coin control but it is a pain.
Are you pool owner ? if so i can imagine you might have hundreds of address . Yea, and miner. Have over 30K inputs left to go...most in in the 0.0002 range. :/ Miners can thank me for the block transaction fees im creating  Edit: dating back to the very beginning of this coin...the original dev gave me access to the source code prior to launch so i could have the pool ready. I mined some of the first blocks. I also was one of the only miners on this coin when it went into limbo for a year or so. |
|
|
|
|
Have been trying to consolidate using coin control but it is a pain.
|
|
|
|
|
Have too much dust so might not be able to transfer all of it in time. The one per day limit is also a problem.
|
|
|
|
Who else thinks the swap date should be extended?!  |
|
|
|
Would that be 'casinos' using the closed loop Prypto system to accept customer deposits (which is what everyone is waiting for with baited breath) or 'casinos' using CSC as a payment method to purchase services, such as location confirmation etc?
Someone correct me if I'm wrong but I think that (Prypto) experiment failed? |
|
|
|
Swaps are being done manually by one person. Over the holidays they have been slower than usual. It sounds like you did everything right...just have to wait for the person who is handling the swaps to process it. Go here to see the status: http://casinocoin.org/swaplist/Edit: I too have been waiting patiently...in my case I have a lot of "dust" so I'm having to deal with combining inputs and the "one swap a day" thing doesn't help. I suggest that restriction get lifted for the last month.  Edit2: By "dust" I'm talking about over 600K inputs! hehehe |
|
|
|
Anyone else unable to unlock their wallets? I keep getting the message "This operation needs the wallet passphrase to unlock the wallet" when I try to unlock or send. Never gives me a chance to enter the passphrase. Tried two different wallet files.  Nevermind....just had to expand the window.  |
|
|
|
Anyone else unable to unlock their wallets? I keep getting the message "This operation needs the wallet passphrase to unlock the wallet" when I try to unlock or send. Never gives me a chance to enter the passphrase. Tried two different wallet files. |
|
|
|
|
FYI, Windows Defender identifies 1.3.1 as a Trojan:Win32/Bitrep.A
|
|
|
|
|
WTS:
100,000 CSC for 5 BTC
or
0.00005 BTC per CSC
|
|
|
|
Good news...ordered additional memory for the servers. Should arrive sometime next week. This should make room for additional pools Also working on updating the code to version 13.4. HI CartmanSPC been mining ANC on your pool yet no payout why please? This was due to using an exchange address for payment. It has been resolved. |
|
|
|
Hi all...been out of the crypto world for a while. I see there is a new version of ANC...does anyone have the 64 bit non-installable (zip) version?
Not sure right now what version the pool runs but I think it is 0.9.6.12.
Is that still compatible or do I need to update it as well? If so then I will (try) compile the Linux version from the source.
I know the version of p2pool I run does not support the larger TX's but I don't feel like maintaining a different p2pool code base just for ANC than the other coins.
If you feel it is appropriate I can just take down the p2pool node I run.
There are a lot of huge txs, it would be nice if you could merge the patch. it just does a small change and you could even make it dependend on network (ie, only if anoncoin network selected). this way you wouldnt break compatibility with others (i'd add that code to my version, so you could cherry-pick the 2 commits). I didnt ask you to take it down tough  Ok!  I will add the code you developed to my ANC P2Pool node...I believe it is just this one commit? https://github.com/K1773R/p2pool/commit/6079f026e22ffcfb80a5ac1937005ab2b9d5ccd0Edit: I faintly recall forestv specifying reasons not to increase the TX size setting but since I don't have any connecting peers the point is moot. Also the benefit outweighs the risk for ANC specifically. That is correct, thats the only commit you'll need to be able to mine bigger tx's. xpool.net update to allow larger tx's! Can you/someone test to see if it is working? |
|
|
|
Hi all...been out of the crypto world for a while. I see there is a new version of ANC...does anyone have the 64 bit non-installable (zip) version?
Not sure right now what version the pool runs but I think it is 0.9.6.12.
Is that still compatible or do I need to update it as well? If so then I will (try) compile the Linux version from the source.
I know the version of p2pool I run does not support the larger TX's but I don't feel like maintaining a different p2pool code base just for ANC than the other coins.
If you feel it is appropriate I can just take down the p2pool node I run.
There are a lot of huge txs, it would be nice if you could merge the patch. it just does a small change and you could even make it dependend on network (ie, only if anoncoin network selected). this way you wouldnt break compatibility with others (i'd add that code to my version, so you could cherry-pick the 2 commits). I didnt ask you to take it down tough Ok! I will add the code you developed to my ANC P2Pool node...I believe it is just this one commit? https://github.com/K1773R/p2pool/commit/6079f026e22ffcfb80a5ac1937005ab2b9d5ccd0Edit: I faintly recall forestv specifying reasons not to increase the TX size setting but since I don't have any connecting peers the point is moot. Also the benefit outweighs the risk for ANC specifically. |
|
|
|
Yes thats my address from btc38 and i use it to mine on pools when i can the balance is not exactly accurate as it only shows entire transaction i wish i had that 4k+ though. Thanks for making things clear now
You can NOT use an exchange address with p2pool. The exchange got your block rewards but do not know they belongs to you. I actually forget the technical reason for this (lol) but that's the way it is. I would contact them letting them know that you used one of their addresses with p2pool. I'm sure they can work it out somehow. |
|
|
|
I have uploaded two zip files with all executables created by the build process. Yes 0.9.6.12 is compatible with 0.9.6.13, the last one resolve a bug about spending change. Perfect...thanks!!! |
|
|
|
|
Hi all...been out of the crypto world for a while. I see there is a new version of ANC...does anyone have the 64 bit non-installable (zip) version?
Not sure right now what version the pool runs but I think it is 0.9.6.12.
Is that still compatible or do I need to update it as well? If so then I will (try) compile the Linux version from the source.
I know the version of p2pool I run does not support the larger TX's but I don't feel like maintaining a different p2pool code base just for ANC than the other coins.
If you feel it is appropriate I can just take down the p2pool node I run.
|
|
|
|
|
I know you don't want to take over this project but any chance of getting the person able to accept code changes do so in a timely manner? If you change the code but the source is not updated right away we will be in the same situation we are now.
Another problem is getting someone to inform everyone (exchanges/miners) of an upcoming fork and moving to it before it occurs. Ultimately, we simply don't have a leader for this coin. Perhaps we should not do anything until we do?
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, current situation is sort of a mess. I suppose 1.5.3 (and 1.5.4) are the winning chain. Kind of a shame since 1.5.5 was a nice update but no one is using it. To make matters worse the original source was update to 1.5.5 but still no one has switched. Doing so now produces problems for the exchanges as all transactions would not have occurred on 1.5.5.
What to do?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
