 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
|
I'm glad my bitcoin twitter thing isn't on that list. I don't make mention of bitcoins specifically, I just post mtgox stats in half as a service for those that want up to date mtgox info on twitter, but mostly to decrease spam on the irc channel, people used to incessantly mention every tiny swing. So it's a tongue-in-cheek statement of, "Yes, yes, we all have the internet..."
+1 hate for twitter, but it has 1-2 uses.
|
|
|
|
I have 7 $5 amazon.com gift codes I'd like to sell for bitcoins. They're also on the bitcoin-otc order book Listed price is 4.75/{mtgoxlast} which as of now would equal 0.28 BTC per card (mtgox just traded at 16.75), and can even round down to 1.90 if you grab all of them!  I'm in good standing here and the -otc. |
|
|
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJlqbCq8YioNow he sells bitcoin insurance, you can spill coffee on your computer, and it's backed up and secured by him and his concealed handgun license, INTERNET! http://www.megaupload.com/?d=AAT6G8AZ <--contains the video files used to create this, hopefully someone can set this to music, I can see "Bitcoins! Internet! Bitcoins! Internet! You have a wallet!" being a big hit.
|
|
|
|
For all who have 0 MHash/s. Just wait and in can start.
I appreciate this, but i've left it on for quite a long time, and still 0Mhash/s showing, still 0% cpu  oh well |
|
|
|
Any chance of getting the hash rate output to the stdout instead of stderr so "guiminer" can display hash rates?
Thanks
does adding "1>&2" at the end of the command work for you? although i don't know guiminer, so just taking a shot in the dark Well test for the 0MHash/sec on ubuntu naughty and the recent source (today) and reply I'll try the recent source, but if the solution is 11.04, i don't want to be right, i'll just end my trials here. |
|
|
|
[....cut...]
I still get 0MHash/sec and 0% cpu usage, what am i doing wrong?
Had the same problem only to find out that I saved the miner's name wrong: Names are case sensitive. So check if you've spelled your data correctly when running bitcoin-miner.exe. (I'm new to bitcoin and mining, so this is my only idea about what could have went wrong. I still hope it helps...) Silverfang Thanks for the reply I had mostly done what walidzohair did already, but repeated the steps just to be safe, at that point we both had the same/similar problem. i'm using the latest version not sure what more could go into this |
|
|
|
Funny  Yes, I did exactly what you did (except I'm using gcc-4.6), and ran into 0 MHash/sec as I sad The bug fixed, please redownload sources. confirmed .. working now on ubuntu natty (naughty) FINALLY and it is hashing too! Iw ill confirm about teh performance gain later and if it actually hash out some milicoins I still get 0MHash/sec and 0% cpu usage, what am i doing wrong? |
|
|
|
Rather than look at this from an economics stand-point, is it fair to say that the reason I only apply the "between consenting adults" to sexy times is that 'who puts what where' isn't going to change the course of anything? Take twenty dicks, for all I care, it doesn't change the day to day, except in that one facet. You can be the most vanilla person in the pants or crazy, and you still put your pants on one leg at a time (some substitute ass-less chaps for pants, whatever)
I don't care if i'm oversimplifying this, I fail to recognize how "I can stick parts of me in other people's parts in fun and interesting ways" == "There should be no minimum wage" I make love using an intricate series of pulleys, your argument is invalid.
What about the kids, man?  We don't regulate sexual activities between consenting adults, but what if a man cheats on his wife with a ho, gets AIDS and then gives it to his wife? Then the negative externalities are that the kids will not have parents. What about politicians who have mistresses on the side that they pay with government money and who distract them from their jobs? Ha ha, these are contrived examples to be sure, but you can think of all kinds of ways that not regulating sexual activities can cause negative externalities. But they certainly aren't good reasons to do so. Last time i checked the only stock prices that were effected by an outbreak of AIDS was apple. I guess I do have to concede the fact that if you get a disease from your activity, then medical costs go up, otherwise these seem pretty lame examples. The bank doesn't foreclose on my house because I get herpes, you can argue that when you get to paying for sex instead of consistent partners that it could spiral into a social outcome, but the scope is still very limited compared to if everyone decided taking unlivable wages was a turn on. |
|
|
|
|
no response from kpriess, selling to drise
|
|
|
|
Aww man! I missed both... Eh, Shit happens. haven't had any word from kpriess at any rate, i'll have another one soon, like i said |
|
|
|
Rather than look at this from an economics stand-point, is it fair to say that the reason I only apply the "between consenting adults" to sexy times is that 'who puts what where' isn't going to change the course of anything? Take twenty dicks, for all I care, it doesn't change the day to day, except in that one facet. Well, you might have trouble walking/working the next day? Also, having unprotected promiscuous sex increases the risk of spreading disease. I'm willing to be there are plenty of other negative externalities too. Everyone can get tested, who's against that? 'who puts what where' isn't going to change the course of anything? What about putting folding cash into landlord's pocket? (Because it turns him on) We're talking about genitals here, don't corrupt the argument Also, how is "Free love means we shouldn't have a minimum wage" any different than "When I'm fishing I choose where to cast my rod, therefore I can tresspass wherever i want"? |
|
|
|
Well im interested if you still have it, same price 1.20 tho..
sure, great, pm'ing you now |
|
|
|
|
Rather than look at this from an economics stand-point, is it fair to say that the reason I only apply the "between consenting adults" to sexy times is that 'who puts what where' isn't going to change the course of anything? Take twenty dicks, for all I care, it doesn't change the day to day, except in that one facet. You can be the most vanilla person in the pants or crazy, and you still put your pants on one leg at a time (some substitute ass-less chaps for pants, whatever)
I don't care if i'm oversimplifying this, I fail to recognize how "I can stick parts of me in other people's parts in fun and interesting ways" == "There should be no minimum wage" I make love using an intricate series of pulleys, your argument is invalid.
|
|
|
|
|
I also have a $5 amazon.com code, it's been up for sale on #bitcoin-otc
Price has been "4.50 / {mtgoxlast}" BTC but i'm open to offers.
I get them pretty regularly, should get another on the 11th or 12th, then another around the 17th and so on.
|
|
|
|
No, ROTR is cyclic right shift. There are no such operation in C language.
_rotr intrinsic function available on GCC 4.5 for Intel x86/x64 platform.
For those of you on Linux encountering this problem, configure with CC=gcc-4.5 and CXX=g++-4.5 For example, CC=gcc-4.5 CXX=g++-4.5 ./configure ...[rest goes here]... You will need to install gcc and g++ 4.5 for this to work, and you should be able to confirm the right gcc used in compile output scrolling by. Thanks, this was helpful, it compiled, but when i run it, it does nothing. The following is what i've done so far, sudo aptitude install gcc-4.5
sudo aptitude install g++-4.5
sudo cp JWASM /usr/bin/jwasm
sudo chmod +x /usr/bin/jwasm
sudo aptitude install libpcre++-dev
sudo aptitude install libcurl4-dev
CC=gcc-4.5 CXX=g++-4.5 ./configure
make |
|
|
|
Just tried to compile this on Linux x86-64. It dumps a ton of warning and fails with the following errors: el/inc/../libext/ext-fw.h:924: error: cast from ‘void*’ to ‘int’ loses precision
bitcoin-sha256.h:52: error: ‘_rotr’ was not declared in this scope
I have the same error In file included from bitcoin-miner.cpp:33:
bitcoin-sha256.h: In function ‘Ext::UInt32 Rotr32(Ext::UInt32, int)’:
bitcoin-sha256.h:50: error: ‘_rotr’ was not declared in this scope
make: *** [bitcoin-miner.o] Error 1
|
|
|
|
|
