 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 »
|
|
When do they plan to reattempt payment ? any news?
|
|
|
|
|
Are there any Telegram channels where they discuss this puzzle?
|
|
|
|
"How stupid I am. I kept looking at the re-uploaded version with worse quality, and it seemed to me like it was www ****** com. I even went through a bunch of options in Python, like sq****, gq****, etc.))) Why did they re-upload the video in worse quality if there was a better quality version available at the time, hmm, it’s really unfortunate. I even thought people would see those numbers (5784623964023 578462396402), but there's nothing clearly visible there." By the way, I was always looking at this version of the video: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=793720.msg63745283#msg63745283 |
|
|
|
|
On the slide where Tony's birthday is, there are the words 'WWW ***** COM' on the chair and 'KRYPTOKIT COM' and 'RUSHWALLET COM' on the legs. Has anyone figured out what 'WWW ***** COM' stands for? SQOUX? SQCMX?"
|
|
|
|
Fontas lol madness days.... do you remember the troll box on Poloniex? it was so funny ...
I forgot about Bluetrade and Crptopia..
2012 was my starting year in crypto also.
At that time, on Poloniex there was only few trading pairs vs btc.. like ltc and novacoin
Yea I do remember. Was mostly in the BTC-e trollbox though, casually on Polo, too. It sure was funny, but at some point, I disabled it because it interfered in a not so beneficial way with my onsite gambling  Still didn't receive funds. Might be because I'm at the end of the list, or because DKB bank somehow forgot how to do fast transfers. Even Euro withdrawals from Kraken (which used to be near instant in 90% of times) now take up to 3 days if you initiate a withdrawal on, say, Friday evening... and I was hoping that the days where banks hold our nonsense fiat money ransom just to create friction in the process were over, what a naive thing to think ^^ Are they still with January 14th or did they extend the sending period, does anyone know? this is the answer I received "Hello, If you have not received the payment by January 28, 2025, as explained in the Distribution Notice, please respond to this email with your claim number & current payment instructions and we will re-attempt payment if necessary. Kind regards, KCC Class Action Services LLC Fund Administrator" |
|
|
|
|
I haven't received the payment yet. Considering that my bank has changed the correspondent bank, I don’t know if I will receive the payment. I hope they will contact me if there are problems sending the payment. Just in case, I wrote to their email that my bank had changed the correspondent bank
|
|
|
|
We are nearing 0.4% of the entire 64 bit range checked Total Ranges Checked: 535,855 of 134,217,728 Total Private Keys Checked: 36.82368 Quadrillion Percentage completed: 0.399243% About 1 in every 250 ranges checked If you have extra power and want to contribute check out http://www.ttdsales.com/64bit/mine spent electricity will cost more than a reward. |
|
|
|
As I said herb was testtest and has mined multiple times at 3 and 3.5 billion keys a second. I have been in contact with him for a while now so I trust his ranges. He is the one who found several of the larger brute forced ranges. I would not have added it if I had doubt.
ttdclient
I think he is mining solo again. If he find key he will grab full reward. If we find key he will grab major part of reward. Win-win strategy. I'll not participate on this. I'll give you credit for your thesis, that's actually an interesting point - i did not think of that, that being said - i still believe we will see Zielar active in the pool again what is the point of spending more resources than reward itself? I tried for about 10 days to search for a key on rx 570. but came to the conclusion that this is a futile undertaking |
|
|
|
2048 addresses and they are all empty |
|
|
|
in this benchmark hashcat amd vega 64 better than gtx 1080 for algoritms RIPEMD-160(14%) and SHA-256(30%) |
|
|
|
ETFbitcoin thanks but I already tried it and got no difference -b 64 rx470 only 32 compute units . I noticed that the speed is affected by the core clock. but since my video card has poor cooling, I think the 83Mkey/s limit is for me. I wanted to try the VanitySearch, but as it turned out, it works only with Nvidia i am going to buy GTX 1080. I’m very interested in what speed the vega(56,64) has |
|
|
|
Hello My rx470 4gb gives only 80Mkey/s it's normal? I tested with these parameters in Windows 10 : clBitCrack.exe -b 32 -t 256 -p 4096 -c 1FRoHA9xewq7DjrZ1psWJVeTer8gHRqEvR as I understand it for cards from AMD this program is poorly optimized  |
|
|
|
 Is this 2123626 million or 2,123,626? I'm using a Vega 64 with "clBitCrack.exe -b 500 -t 256 -p 1024 -c -u"  ? 2123626 Mkey/s . this is unrealistic speed. looks like a bug. guys how much gives vega56? |
|
|
|
Can this "Birthday paradox" be used for this option?.
PoB (Paradox of Birthdays) PoB as an average prvkey distribution (if believe the statistics), the next time (#62) it should not work. That is, if #61 it was necessary to search in 30% already win, then now the opposite is true - in 60% never win. And big problem is that it is not stable. If you were waiting for the moment know it(#61) was PoB as recurring characters more stable, it + ~50%. But, see simple calculation #55 had a ~50% profitability (use VanityGen) compared to the complexity of mining (end 2018, excluding electricity costs). (if the seeker is unlucky, and he goes through the whole range and finds the key at the end - he will still receive ~50% of the profit, compared to the mining) #58 had a ~50% profitability (use BitCrack) compared to the complexity of mining. #59 had a ~50% profitability (use BitCrack) compared to the complexity of mining only if seeker is lucky and 0% if unlucky. Suppose that BitCrack can work another 2x faster (in theoretically limit), according to information from this and other topics. Than #60 - last puzzle, where profit was possible (in theory). Conclusion - the puzzle is no longer profitable! (only if the author increases the award or mining will not be profitable by 4x+more) Solve the puzzles for fame? Ok, why not?.. But having opened the blockchain, I don’t see any glory from #58, except for the simple draining of the address  you can try and buy hashpower from nicehash
They will not go for it. Because need to add BitCrack as a new algorithm and enter the payment rate. There are lots of programs to calculate, but they do not add them. I think they are simply not profitable. It's sad, because this project that has a great opportunity to consider not useless PoW, but something real. What about Amazon? 4x-10x expensive vs mining. What about FPGA? 10x expensive vs gpu, but how many X speedup? (some info 10x, gpus equal, but electricity costs 10x profit) I agree. difficulty 2^61 the gpu that eats 150 watts and gives 150Mkey/s to go through all the keys 2^61 eats 640000 kilowatt = 19000$(cost 0.03$/kWh)-64000$(0.1$/kWh ) |
|
|
|
Учите матчасть! Это максимально возможный приватный ключ для эфира, следующий fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffebaaedce6af48a03bbfd25e8cd0364141 как показывает листинг относится к адресу 0x3f17f1962B36e491b30A40b2405849e597Ba5FB5, но это просто отображение, на самом деле https://keys.lol/ethereum/1Там приватный ключ 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000, но по правилам системы, ключ не может быть нулевым. Действительный первый приватный ключ это 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001. И получается деньги видим, приватный ключ видим, но сделать ничего не можем. Хотя есть вариант что к адресу 0x3f17f1962B36e491b30A40b2405849e597Ba5FB5 может подходить ещё не один приватный ключ. Имеем Максимальный приватный ключ, а также максимальное кол-во возможных ключей. С любого приватного ключа в этом диапазоне можно получить публичный адрес. 115792089237316195423570985008687907852837564279074904382605163141518161494329Макcимальный адрес в теории (0xfffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff) , а также максимальное кол-во адресов, всего лишь. 23384026197294446691258957323460528314494920687615И получается по теории вероятности на один адрес приходится 4951760157141521099596496895 в хексе (0fffffffffffffffffffffff) приватных ключей!!!!!!  вот такая вот вероятность! спс я про это уже прочитал несколько дней назад. сделал вывод что в лоб бессмысленно пытаться даже на удачу!!!!. вот пазл транзакции интересная тема. надо будет вникнуть по глубже ради интереса |
|
|
|
не думаю, что при помощь программ можно подобрать приват кей, возможно если запустить для этой цели квантовый комп то возможно и можно будет что то подобрать, а на простом компе это займёт очнень-очень много времени для перебора всех возможных комбинаций и то не факт что даже если и удастся что то подобрать на том кошельке что то будет Хочу просто привести одну таблицу о времени подбора, только учтем что приват key содержит 64 символа  Мне кажется тут комментарии излишни!  откуда у тебя это бредовая таблица. перебор 53 бита составляет 1 год пулом мощности 200Мkey/s. 60 бита вполне можно перебрать. вот дальше печаль. вот если бы сузить коридор где достаточно перебрать 2^60 ключей ммм . в лоб к несчастью подобрать ключ не получиться 160бита слишком много. |
|
|
|
Кроме собственно подбора символов нужно еще попытаться отпереть кошелек этим "ключом" и (если получилось) проверить его баланс. Что означает необходимость доступа к блокчейну. И если операция перебора теоретически может быть очень быстрой (микросекунды), то операция проверки, что ключ отпирает какой-то кошелек уже требует существенного времени (сотни миллисекунд). То есть время проверки стремится к бесконечности. Поэтому, забейте на этот "способ разбогатеть". все адреса где есть деньги заранее скачиваются и идет сравнение с этими адресами ни какой доступ к блокчейну не нужен. например в биткоине есть около 9млн адресов в которых есть сумма от 100$ и выше. ну да шансы ничтожны так как чтобы отпереть один адрес нужно проверить примерно 2**134 ключей. https://lbc.cryptoguru.org/stats у этого пула сейчас мощность 295Мkey/s . сейчас вроде идет охота за этими адресами https://www.blockchain.com/de/btc/address/1CENDvi6tmKGrR8RxqwURpX9WHbbKip1dbpuzzle transaction |
|
|
|
думаю можно на 1 месяц запустит их программу для перебора. кто знает может кому-та повезет. интервал перебора от 0 до 2**159. я так понял не нужно перебирать все 2**256.
Это не возможно, кей слишком сложно и ни какая программа подбора не поможет, на это ушло бы много лет Почти нереально, но возможно. шансы от 0 до ... |
|
|
|
|
