Latest posts of: bradford

Show Posts
Pages: [1]

on: November 05, 2013, 04:01:53 PM

Things look good for me as well. Glad the issue was resolved!

on: October 31, 2013, 01:59:21 PM

I sent a token amount of LTC to my crypto.st deposit address 3 days ago. It confirmed on the block chain, but my crypto.st account is still unchanged. I sent 1 support email regarding this and have received no response after ~60 hours. Along with the fact that Budabob07 having concurrent withdrawal delays... Looks like no one is at the helm. Shamoon?

on: October 29, 2013, 12:29:12 AM

Quote from: Jouke on October 26, 2013, 06:52:02 PM I have never ever programmed in python, but I think I know what is going wrong. I have changed the code in deserialize.py . The import does continue, and the data seems right. But be sure to make a backup of the database!! Your snippet worked for me. Back up and running. Thanks Jouke!

on: August 28, 2013, 01:16:15 PM

Thanks for the update on the DC trip - glad that the important work is being done, congratulations to Marco and company. Proud to be a Foundation member.

on: July 22, 2013, 06:07:57 PM

Quote from: Chaang Noi (Goat) ช้างน้อย on July 21, 2013, 02:08:37 AM "Forty-eight US states regulate money transmitters although the laws vary from one state to the other.[3] Most of the states[4] require a surety bond with widely ranging amounts from as little as $25,000 to over $1 million and maintaining a minimum capital requirement." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Money_transmitter What are the two free states? Thanks According to this PDF document prepared by Thomas Brown at UC Berkeley the two free states are South Carolina and Montana.

on: April 19, 2013, 12:07:24 PM

Anybody know what power improvements are being claimed in the "new" boards?

on: April 18, 2013, 08:35:50 PM

I use BTC-E for cross-crypto exchanging as it is one of the few exchanges that supports Litecoin, Namecoin.

on: April 18, 2013, 08:28:27 PM

I'm just jumping in with my naive opinion, so please criticize as necessary. Why not reference difficulty in terms of number of leading zeroes for the target hash? For instance "our difficulty level is at 14 leading zeroes of precision" I realize that the jump from each zero to the next is not linear, but wouldn't it be useful for describing "epochs" of difficulty?

on: April 18, 2013, 08:14:07 PM

Tough to tell!

on: April 18, 2013, 05:08:14 PM

Like a mechanical turk/ work marketplace that pays for work in Bitcoin? It's interesting to think about this, given the fact that the computer work (SHA256) used to mine bitcoin performs much better on GPU, FPGA, and ASIC than with CPU implementations. No reason that other computers should get left behind in the process.

on: April 18, 2013, 04:52:52 PM

Quick question - Does it take more resources for you to run 3 cards separately or together? Also, I would have to say that part of this depends on each payment's pool reward method and fees. If you've already accounted for these considerations, the question is analogous to betting strategy in a lottery: Do I bet on 3 numbers for $1 apiece or do I bet on 1 number for $3? Due to the stochastic nature of Bitcoin mining, no one strategy will be predictably better. This is just my newb opinion. Other thoughts are welcome.

on: April 18, 2013, 04:34:23 PM

Hello, I'm Brad. I've been a long time lurker here, but finally decided to jump into the pool BTC is a revolutionary concept and I hope to discuss more with you all. Brad

Pages: [1]