Your question has already been answered.

Read.

I was thinking about posting something else, but I've decided against it. It's not worth the time.

All I will say is that the difference between most of you and me is that most of you live with the illusion that you are anonymous and have the mistaken belief that somehow the rules of life don't apply the same here. That's yet another laugh.

One of the things I love most about the technological revolution is that everything is written down, fully documented and provable. There's no longer any room for “he said, she said”!

If you're capable of understanding that, then you're capable of realizing how foolish you look when you contradict the actual facts. There's no hiding from reality here. Not even behind your imaginary anonymity. Ask yourselves if you'd do and say the same things in your real lives as you do here. Oops. Are you catching my drift?

(It's so much easier to get to know the real person when they're deluded into thinking they're anonymous.)

As I said, the big difference is that I have no such delusions, stand completely behind every word I write and am not unwittingly mislead: as a real life entrepreneur and businessman from a long line of the same who are quite adept with business dealings, I treat everything and everyone here just as I do in the business world, with no such illusion that this is somehow different. If you're nuts, you're nuts and it doesn't matter whether it's here or anywhere else. And when push comes to shove, the reality is that anyone with the right tools can locate you and track everything that is yours back to you.

People in this space think they have some sort of immunity. You can forget that. In fact, you'd better forget that as soon as possible. That delusion will just get you deeper and deeper into trouble.

In the “real world” we would say that DigiByte is a busted business and that it's going nowhere until there is new management at the helm. Guess what my friends, the real world is here whether you like it or not! And people like me are not going away, rather they are coming in ever greater numbers. Prepare yourselves for the real world, because it's coming to a theater near you soon.

And we take no prisoners.

In the real world, DigiByte's “management” is laughable, and no-one would risk the ridicule of suggesting otherwise.

As it is that I'm absolutely sure this will fall mainly on deaf ears, I will finish simply by wishing you well with what you have left of your delusion, which in this case includes a founder who has been accused of publicly lying with intent to defame and has of yet to address that issue. Isn't that special? Again, if you really tried, if you really weren't so married to your greed, and if you asked yourself “in the real world what would we say about that?”, what would you say then? Yes, I admit, it's a difficult exercise to get outside of your personal narrative, especially when it's so anonymous, so strong and there's so much money to be made, but it's a challenge that just might serve you well.

Good to see you post over here iCEBREAKER. Credible, independent thinkers are in short supply here. The problem of insisting on keeping alive half baked, poorly functioning, poorly maintained products in combination with the "sorry we're too busy" excuse that you point out is something that I have also pointed out countless times. It's not just the DigibyteMarket! The gaming wallet, the Android wallet, the attempts at DiguSign (last year is was up for around 6 months in spite of the fact that you could not search and find the "document" you previously uploaded, and now it's looking very polished BUT there is no privacy at all to what you upload - OMG, everything's stored on the DiguSign servers!), DibiBytetip (which now takes you here: http://digibytetip.com/ ) were all embarrassments and it was impossible to get the "team" to address the issues regardless of whether it was to simply depreciate or fix. The only thing I will say that is positive is that the core wallet and coin technologies are sound - but both of those come from other people and are basically copy and paste. There are lots of possible conclusions that can be drawn from this, and I don't think any can be spun positively. The most basic of all conclusions is that the base technology is in place, and that's about it, and maybe that isn't even that special. I made some super human efforts to try and steer the founder in a more positive direction, even offering him many very interesting ideas (all for free, expect one extremely interesting idea that I wasn't interesting in "giving away" to the "unworthy") all extremely well documented and supported with rational arguments, and they were all rejected, most of the time out-of-hand, and it didn't matter whether I was presenting them as a kindly business associate (1st attempts based on what might be a best practice strategy), simulated feedback from an appalled customer (2nd attempts based on how end users would view things), news critic (3rd attempts based on how negative press would impact), knowledgeable authority on the subject (4th attempts, in the hopes of finally breaking through, based on in your face criticism such as asking where his self-respect was and why he allowed so much crap to weigh down the "project"), etc. My final, executive summary, conclusion is that there is no room here for critical analysis and independent thinkers with respect to meeting and satisfying end users' needs - and that could possibly be because they're only concerned with their own self-interests (which ironically are not being served well either, so that's not much of a possibility), incompetence, or who knows. The bottom line are the facts, and the facts are a series of failures that don't seem to bother the founder in the least. 

Keep up the good work my friend. It's not going to be an easy job to bring some self-respect and credibility to crypto, and I admire the example you're setting.

Cheers,