Thank you JeromeTash .

So my assumption was right.

On
https://app.analytex.today/lend?view=assets&page=1&limit=10
there is a column "All chains" and "All protocols". The name under them are different. For example in chain, it looks like this are the different blockchains that exist. For example Ethereum, Avalanche. But under "All protocols" for example we can not find "Ethereum".

A) So what is the protocol?

B) Why is it important to chose a protocol on https://app.analytex.today/lend?view=assets&page=1&limit=10 ?

C) Can it be, that different blockchains use the same protocol?
D) Can it be, that different protocols are on the same blockchain?

Would appreciate some answer. Thank you.

Thank you. This is what I suspected.

Thank you.

Does this mean, that there are the designers of the blockchain, that decide if only the native coin is available for staking and no tokens. So can you say any blockchain, that allows also to stake any token?

(Please note: I am not talking about "Yield Farming" "lending" or "Liquidity Mining". I am talking about staking as validator or in a pool.)

It is said, that Liquidity Providers on Uniswap will earn from the swap fees, that the trader have to pay.

Question: Is the amount a LP will earn depending on the pair he is providing liquidity?

For example will I earn more with ETH/USDC than USDT/USDC ?

Or do all become the same amount?

(I think it would not be fair if everyone got the same amount, because "impermanent Loss" is bigger with ETH/USDC than USDT/USDC.)

Thank you.

The subject of claimed tainted coins could be a problem (or risk) in the future, if you want to change your crypto back into Fiat and no longer find an exchange, that does not makes two categories of crypto.

Of course you can go to an exchange, that only ensures that buyers and sellers find each other. For example person A) who wants to sell their crypto against Fiat and person B), who wants buy Crypto against Fiat. Person B) directly get Crypto from person A) and person A) directly get Fiat from person B) by providing his bank account number.

BUT: In this case there will be a bank involved.
There were cases in Germany, where person B) has tried to wash his Fiat by buying crypto this way. The bank account of person A) was closed without giving an explanation. (So we could say in this case there was "tainted Fiat".)

-> So when you try to sell your Crypto to get Fiat with a DEX/P2P, you will run into the risk of tainted Fiat.

The only remaining possibility then would be to meet each other live in person with Cash Fiat and Crypto.
But: That would again entail other risks. *haha

Thank you. It's very educational.

Hello,

Is it technically possible to stake USDC (from Ethereum) or can we only stake ETH?

Or in general: Can we also stake coin tokens on "Proof of Stake" blockchains or only the basic coin from the chain?

(Pleas note: I am talking about staking, not lending.)

Would appreciate some answer. Thank you.


Edit: correction: stalk -> stake

To stick with any other coin than Monero for the swap (for example ETH; it's only for interest):



Given, there was no data collecting at the time I made the switch from BTC into ETH and back, then the only possibility to reconstruct the trace between the two blockchains would be ...
-the point of time and
-the amount of the coin (together with the coin market price)?

Right?


But because of the missing collected data, nobody knows at which point in the BTC blockchain-chain the owner has changed. So if someone knows, that a particular BTC address is mine, and then I make some transfers to another BTC address of mine and only then make the switch to ETH, this person does not know, until which BTC address the BTC's are still under mine possession. So he also not knows, from which address the owner has changed. But this would be the point, where I would have switched my BTC into ETH and this person would have to search a suitable corresponding transaction on the ETH blockchain.

Or do I miss anything?

Further more:
There are so much Altcoins. I could have used any other coin than ETH for the switch. So each blockchain must be investigated to find the trace. (?)

Thank you.
Must this adversary (or any data collector) be watching me live, exactly to the time point, if I would make the swap with ETH?

And if at that time point there was no data collecting and I have moved the ETH around, waited as long as possible before swapping back,
then in retrospect it would be the same swapping with ETH like Monero?

(I don't want to do this, I just want to better understand.)

Does this mean, you have sold with a market order?

Thank you all very much. I appreciate it.

I see the advantage of a good mixer now.

But back to the other method:
I do not understand, why privacy (cutting the trace) is better when I make A) instead of B).

A) I use Bisq to switch my BTC into Monero and switch back to BTC (with a different amount).
B) I use Bisq to switch my BTC into ETH and switch back to BTC (with a different amount).

I know, that Monero does not provide a history of the past transactions, but ETH does.
But why is this relevant in the case of switching BTC into another coin and switch back to cut the trace?
The trace on the ETH, if I would use ETH, is not from me. So the past transactions of this ETHs would be useless, if somebody would try to follow my past transactions. What am I missing?

Would be thankful for an answer. Thank you.

Thank you.

Strange. If this is compatible with USA law, I wonder, why other USA exchanges do not allow the same limits.
(I guess it is a competitive advantage if an exchange allows higher limits.)

Edit:
Ah I suppose, this is because Poloniex does not allow to trade real USD.
But: I guess there are other USA exchanges, that do not allow to trade real USD, but have nevertheless a smaller limit. So the question of interest remains.

There are people that use Bitcoin mixer to cover the origin of there Bitcoins with a veil.

I will never make this, because this would make my BTC suspect. And there is a risk to make my BTC's dirty.

But here is my technical question:
When we change our BTC into another crypto and after change them back into BTC, I guess in this case it would no more be possible to trace back the origin of the  origin BTC.
Am I right? Or do I miss anything?
Of course if we make the change on a CEX, it would be possible to trace back the origin, because the CEX will have a history-protocol. But I guess not, when we make this via DEX.


If I am right: Why do people use BTC mixer? Isn't changing BTC into another crypto and change them back, not the much better solution to cut off the trace?

Would appreciate a competent answer. Thank you.

No, after all what has been posted here, I found it too risky. Many critical voices and warnings. And only one positive voice for keeping the KYC promise, however for another exchange.

Just wondering: Is crypto withdraw without KYC in the value of 50'000 $ really compliant with the USA law?

Besten Dank. Genau was ich wissen wollte.

Very informative thank you all very much.

Thank you both.

Hello,

Any experience with poloniex?

It is sead, that we can withdraw coins until 50000$ per day without KCY with tier1.
This is unbelievable.

https://ibb.co/SBLsgzG

Or does this mean 50$ (50.000) ?

I am just worried, that when I want to withdraw 2000$, then it is said, "Sorry, we need KCY".

Would appreciate if someone has experience with this. Thank you.

Hallo,

Auf https://app.uniswap.org/#/tokens/ethereum/0xa0b86991c6218b36c1d19d4a2e9eb0ce3606eb48 findet man Tokens wie: 0xbtc 0xmr

Was genau bedeutet 0xbtc oder 0xmr?

Und was bedeutet 0x?

Besten Dank.