Ethereum'un road map'ine pek bel baglanmasini tavsiye etmem. Zaten simdiden iki yillik gecikmeleri var ve de 2020 öncesi beta asamasina gelmelerini bile zor görüyorum.

Ethereum büyüdükce daha komplike hale geldi. Karar verme asamalari ve development da bundan etkilendi. Su anda ufak degisiklikler bile cok hantal ve sancili ilerleyebiliyor. Ayrica developer'larin da heyecanini kaybettigini söylemek yanlis olmaz. Onlar da sürekli ertelemelerden ve önlerini görememekten usanmis durumdalar. Ancak yapilabilecek cok fazla da bir sey yok. Karar süreclerinde mining yapanlarin da etkisi büyük.

POS icin sharding akilda tutularak gelistirme yapilacak deniliyor ancak sharding halen kagit üzerinde. Zaten state sharding mümkün olacak mi o dahi soru isareti, kesinligi yok. POS epey kapsamli ve de core component'lere kadar degisim gerektiren bir fork. Ben su anki duruma bakinca tahminde dahi bulunamiyorum. Ethereum'un gelecegini parlak görmüyorum.

Bitcoin'in üretiminin sinirli olmasi ve bunun "halvening" denen yapay "pumping" sablonuyla islemesi adaptosyon hedefi olan bir sistem icin tezat. Adaptasyon hedeflenseydi "halvening" degil "doubling" görüyor olurduk. Coin'lerin cogunun ekonomik yapisi trajikomik seviyede. Bu yüzden de cogunda "pyramid scheme" izleri var ve adaptosyonlari neredeyse imkansiz durumda.

Nasil kimse düsecek demiyordu? Bircok ekonomist uyariyordu, bunun cilginlik oldugunu söylüyordu, "collective delusion" diye tekrar tekrar alti ciziliyordu. Bir cok yatirimci da sismis fiyatlardan dolayi piyasadan ciktigini veya bulasmadigini dile getiriyordu. Sanirim siz hype olayina fazla kaptirip rasyonel yorumlari ve haberleri göz ardi etmissiniz.

You wrote that here, on Zilliqa's thread, without even knowing the fact Zilliqa has built-in sharding and will be launched with it.


You wrote that, despite I was right. Just check the topics and their timestamps. I didn't say the CEO of the TomoChain is not involved with NXT, I did say he is not the creator/founder of it, which is true.

You are so funny that you accuse me of not informing myself while what I state are all true and verifiable while you have misinformation and ignorance in every one of your messages that. I also didn't dismiss TomoChain but stated the facts about the current situation. You need to improve your reading comprehension. I'm done here. Good luck!

P.S. Oh and I wrote everything with fact-checking (including TomoChain docs) while you were commenting on Zilliqa's thread with your misinformation even about the basics. You can't point out a single fact that I state is wrong while I proved you are wrong multiple times, lol.

Oh boy, from the beginning of our discussion, I'm correcting your mistakes. You came to Zilliqa's topic without even knowing anything about it. Claiming TomoChain will have sharding before Zilliqa and Zilliqa is doomed etc. Meanwhile, TomoChain has nothing to do with sharding, not a single implementation, test, whatsoever, other than a promise that they will research about sharding, lol. What I wrote are facts and you can verify them. You are full of false information, all over.

Founder of NXT a.k.a BCNext, is Sergey Ivancheglo a.k.a Come-from-Beyond. (both nicks are on this forum, you can search for them).

Here is the NxtWiki: https://nxtwiki.org/wiki/BCNext%27s_Plan
Here is wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nxt#History
Here is the final shot: https://twitter.com/c___f___b/status/932561535322468352

Well, good luck. You will need it.

P.S. I'm sure you will have difficulties even for finding a basic info. So, here is the announcement of NXT: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=303898.0

Oh, and the founder of NXT is Sergey Ivancheglo aka Come-from-Beyond. I know that since I'm also interested in IOTA and he is the board member & founder of the IOTA as well.

First of all, thanks for your constructive response, I was a bit aggressive towards to TomoChain.


They won't have sharding in their main net. They state they are researching about sharding. They didn't implement it. Please check the facts. They have "state sharding" in their roadmap. For your information, state sharding is what ethereum aims for but it is theoretical, still open to debate, it is not even known if it is possible to implement it or not. So they have nothing in hand about sharding, they won't have it in main-net launch.



Even though they somehow achieved implementing sharding for their v2 launch, it is months later than  Zilliqa's main-net. And as I said, there is no indication that they will able to implement it.


Zilliqa mainnet will be launched with the sharding (network sharding). Zilliqa's sharding blended in their project from the beginning.


I don't dismiss their team, I shouldn't since I don't know them. I'm basing my opinion according to their GitHub repo. So, there is nothing new, unique, or different about Tomochain regards to their mainnet launch. I don't know how it will evolve later. But currently, they are not a competitor of Zilliqa. Zilliqa is in a different league. Zilliqa's team amazing. I mean, for example, Ilya Sergey regarded very highly by academics in his field. I won't compare the teams but if you have a good understanding of programming, just check their repos and there won't be anything to discuss. Zilliqa is superior in every way possible. Again, I'm talking about the current state of the developments. 

P.S. Btw, Zilliqa has already over 10k TPS in their stress tests when limited to the payment transactions. And this is in a decentralized manner. Not like having some master nodes to process transactions i.e. similar to distributed SQL (TomoChain, EOS, NEO). So I wasn't focused on TPS since Zilliqa is way above than others if you stick with decentralization target. And plenty of room to improve. No other chain comes close to them as far as I know.

Tomchain doesn't have sharding, they have a plan to implement it in the future (once ethereum have it in 202x, they will copy it too I assume). Tomchain is basically a centralized ethereum (and yes, a fork of ethereum as well), having master-nodes resp. different consensus to speed up transactions. This is really absurd, comparing Tomchain to Zilliqa. Zilliqa is whole another level. The only project with a working sharding solution (yeah, it is working right now) and with far better smart-contract language, support.

P.S. You can compare it to EOS or NEO because of the similarities between their consensus mechanism. At least EOS and NEO have their own blockchain implementations. Anyway, even Tomchain doesn't dare to compare themselves to Zilliqa, at least, not on their GitHub repo (which based on Ethereum with consensus changes, since ethereum couldn't figure it out to make a centralized consensus mechanism and ramp up their TPS, so Tomchain stepped in, lol), that would be laughable. 

Well, I don't think so. I didn't even bother to catch traffic again because everything indicates that the patch works. I also observed the speeds with ethminer,
the results are same. https://i.imgur.com/DMSZ9tu.png 1 x 1060 and 1 x 1050ti dual mining here. Everything seems flawless. P.S. This is the second coin that I mine if someone wonders the speeds. https://i.imgur.com/qbxzdF2.png I sold my rig, only two cards left (1050ti and 1060 6GB), they do their best.  

Don't worry, if the software has that kind of behaviors, it is detectable. Closed source program doesn't mean it can do whatever it wants. It communicates with your OS's environment and also with the internet. That means you can't know actually how it is implemented but you can detect what it does, how it interacts with the other elements.

His code is well secured/protected. Maybe someone can but I and most of us can't.

Here I prepared a mini guide lol. If you use linux, download bless hex editor instead. http://imgur.com/a/gLPMZ

No man. You just change the eth address with yours, that's all. It is like editing a text file. Copy your address and paste on his address, done. 

@tesar
Just patch this NoDevFee and you are good to go. No stale or stolen shares.