I think its difficult for any decision to be made on ratios or numbers until the difficulty increases and the number of illicitly mined coins is known.  The key point is that investors are investors regardless of whether they invested on the platform or invested on the exchange. It would be ideal if a fair deal could be worked out based on the dollar value of the coins at time of purchase.  

Under the circumstances would it be possible to ask the exchange to not accept new deposits of BTBc and to let the BTBc on the exchange sell out?  This would stop the bleeding and the risk of new coins entering the market.

Are you sure you want to name your new coin Laser?  You are aware that there is a VERY HIGH RISK High Yield Investment Program that goes by the same name that many on youtube advise will be collapsing soon?  https://laser.online/

Under the circumstances this is a terrible choice of name!

That's good to hear, and I do have confidence in this project and that things will be set right.  I think people would feel more comfortable knowing that both the investors that bought from the exchange and investors that bought during and after the ICO will be looked after.  Clarifying this will go a long way in putting the FUD to rest.

I see a lot of FUD here.... I tend to give people the benefit of the doubt and it seems to me that they are reacting to a bad situation and that no decision will make everyone happy.  The whole point of giving away coins is to attract people to the site and if lots of people are fraudulently registering multiple times using fake email accounts, its reasonable to react by adding additional controls such as the requirement to invest a bit more or to lend on the platform in order to utilize the tokens.

A scam is where someone takes the money and disappears (bitpetite) and if they are responding to posts here and intending to launch a new coin that is more secure, then I think the community needs to appreciate the situation they are in and let them do what needs to be done to set things right. 

Spamming this newsgroup with hate messages in bold, caps, emojis and big red lettering is not helpful, especially if the main complaint is about not receiving 50 coins that was a gift anyway.  The people that invested in this platform, whether during the ICO or by buying the coins off the exchange, are the customers that have been impacted and things need to be set right by them.

This is a bad situation and I appreciate that the investors are not simply being abandoned, and also appreciate that a new platform is being established that will satisfy the mission that the project was initially set out to achieve.  Many projects have had difficulties/dark days and with support and perseverance, these difficulties will be overcome.

 
PHISHING SCAM WARNING

I just participated in the DIM ICO by sending NEM.
A few hours later I received the following email from dimcoin@outlook.com which I believe to be a phishing email

--------------------------
Subject: Cancel Payment. New wallet address

Attention. The Dimcoin site is attacked by DDOS attacks. We therefore ask all investors not to pay any more to the NEM wallet address. All payments made there will be canceled in 15 days and automatically returned to the sender. If you still want to participate in the ICO, wait until your payment comes back or send the same quantity to our new address. Consider the ICO can be over in 15 days. Please support Dimcoin by sharing the Facebook post.


New Wallet address: NA7CI5-7WVDPN-I6WV2Q-YARSDD-T5W6SK-7OVIX7-KIHW

Facebook: https: //www.facebook.com/Dimcoin-542860792771642/


Thanks to her Dimcoin team