Show Posts
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
On the solo pool, do you have a set starting difficulty (diff_xxxx) setting you put in the password, or since you specify “works with nicehash and miningrigrentals”, are those ports for equihash high difficulty ports?
I looked on your start up help for miningrigrentals but didn’t see anything there. You might have it specified somewhere else, I just couldn’t find it.
|
|
|
So what am I missing  Don’t subscribe “by sending funds straight from an exchange”, but list no wallet to use. Tried the free demo and if I choose to use 2year history and forecast btc the next 2 weeks hourly, I get a forecast that starts at 625, and bounces around 615-690. If I choose to use 5year history I get a forecast that starts at 456 and bounces 450-490. Please note, I’m not throwing shade, I want to try the product out, and profoundly believe this is me missing the obvious and having to note “op error” once again. 
|
|
|
any BCC mining calculators out yet? Has the difficulty fully retargeted to the new hashrate? Wondering if it's worth firing up my S5 or not. Power cost is not an issue.
I've been wondering about this as well. However IF early reports are correct and 10-15% of the hashrate of btc went to Bcash, then all you have to ask is, "was I running my s5 in April of last year?". Difficulty was about 10% of what it is now, and btc was $400 ish. If everything is correct (including my logic), I think that makes s7's profitable, and s5's slightly profitable in the right conditions.
|
|
|
Poloniex is offline? Captain do we have a problem here?
UPDATE : PoloniexTwitter : "We're aware of the connectivity issues and are working to resolve them." Mt. Gox and BTC-E were also aware of their connectivity problems. 😂 Not a jab, got money in there too... just trying to diffuse the tension. 👍
|
|
|
No other exchanges with similar problems. That narrows it down to Polo.
That's the easy answer... maybe the easy, simple, correct answer. The more complicated answer is why does this keep happening. Once again, is it Polo or Ltc. Is there something ltc has done to now make Polo have to "take them offline" for a bit out of precaution? Is Polo having issue with ltc traffic, and this is a way of throttling it (like Polo has run out of ltc in their hot wallets)? Is Polo trying to manipulate the market? This is mere curiosity on my part... I believe both ltc and Polo are here to stay.
|
|
|
Last three weeks at some time Polo has taken deposits and withdrawals off due to ltc... or so they say. Litecoin dev has responded on twitter that he wished Polo would contact him when they post the "dev might have to address this issue"... or something like that.
Now... just recently, they have frozen ltc the second time in about a week an a half.... so, what the hell, is it ltc, or Polo?
Please note the wallet being taken offline for a couple of hours isn't really my issue, it's the frozen stuff that gets me on edge.
|
|
|
The initial reports they weren't able to pay ongoing claims due to not hitting an ethereum block demonstrates they are severely underfunded and relying upon incoming deposits and luck. The fact they suddenly run into problems the moment the market turns down seems like no coincidence. Many people predicted these same things years ago. How they would ever be able to handle users stopping 'reinvestment' and then withdrawing en masse remains shrouded in mystery.
Watching the mental denial process of people participating in a true Ponzi is mind boggling. Like drowning swimmers they'll lash out and try to drag down the people trying to save them.
This is the truly obsurdly enormous red flag, at the very least, they sold more hashrate then they have mining... for the sake of the arguement, assume they have the mining facility they have claimed to have. They claim to have the largest ethereum mine, they claim to have 200,000 customers... if each customer only put in the $30 minimum for 1 MH, then the facility is producing at least 200 GH... does it make sense that a 200 GH mining facility hasn't hit a block in a month... 2 months... 6 months (the article I think said since Feb.) Either the report is full of it, or GM. Regardless, having issues paying customers/contrators/suppliers is never a good sign for a company.
|
|
|
'Pyramid scheme' here is a figure of speech. And he does have a valid point. Until bitcoin becomes a currency used for transactions (for all intents and purposes it is not yet one) its value depends on the influx of new speculative money. Hence the reference to a pyramid scheme. No to be taken literally.  Capitalism in general depends on new money, wether by expanding markets, or opening new markets. Industries that don't get new money, die. True but here I'm talking about speculative money. Money that looks for speculative capital gains, not returns from productive activities. If you read the threads in this forum nearly everyone is focused on the PRICE of bitcoin, past current and future, not it's actual value proposition. The speculative mindset is near 100% predominant with bitcoin.Valid point, and the article makes valid points as well... hell the most valid point, would you rather own Every single bitcoin right now, own 100% stake in Goldman-Sachs, or own 100% stake in PayPal... seriously, every owner of a crypto should ask themselves that question. If people say Bitcoin, they are definitely a true believer.... I am not... I'm a believer, but the f**k if I'm going to drink the Kool-Aide. 😋
|
|
|
'Pyramid scheme' here is a figure of speech. And he does have a valid point. Until bitcoin becomes a currency used for transactions (for all intents and purposes it is not yet one) its value depends on the influx of new speculative money. Hence the reference to a pyramid scheme. No to be taken literally.  Capitalism in general depends on new money, wether by expanding markets, or opening new markets. Industries that don't get new money, die.
|
|
|
For those who don't remember the Y2K bug was supposed to kick in on Jan, 1st 2000, giving computers worldwide an invalid date, causing bank computers to lose all your money, aviation computers would fail causing planes to fall from the sky, Nukes would be inadvertently launch, the vaticans computers would fail releasing Lucifer from his prison in hell...  Then, nothing happened. Why? people had a plan, and the plan was executed. The panic that was Y2K masked the true big baddy that investors should have been fearful of.... a big .com bubble. Sound familiar, a scary technical issue that really amounts to nothing, in a overhyped, bloated industry, where a good chunk of businesses/coins offer no true value/innovation, and IPOs/ICOs business model starts and ends with "Collect Money".... After August 1st, if prices shoot to the moon... be very weary. Bitcoin is strong, but just like the .com burst, the strong survived... but they didn't survive without a beating. Not saying it's going to happen, just words from a dude that lost money during the .com burst, and just something that I will be watching closely.
|
|
|
Yesterday I saw an article from coindesk saying that GM ran out of ethereum cause they haven't mined a block in 6 weeks.... ahhhhh..... if it's true, that's trouble, if it's an attempt at an excuse, that's trouble.
Link? Disregard. I searched the web, and looked through my history and found nothing... guess I dreamed it?!??!
|
|
|
My Pending balance shows a - (negative) symbol, and it hasn't moved for a week now. Something really fishy here? Can anybody comment on what happened here?
My payouts have also stopped recording, but have been paid out in the coins that met their payout minimum (ltc and dash). A month ago they stopped showing my unpaid balance (not happy, and added more skepticism) A week ago they stopped showing payouts period... but still paid out, which added so much skepticism that I have now written them off. * Yesterday I saw an article from coindesk saying that GM ran out of ethereum cause they haven't mined a block in 6 weeks.... ahhhhh..... if it's true, that's trouble, if it's an attempt at an excuse, that's trouble. Either way, it is what it is. I love the premise of being able to mine with only $30, and no electrical restrictions, had to give it a try. We'll just have to wait and see what happens here. Edit : * swear is saw an article, but seeing I could not find it on a search, or looking through my history, guess it didn't happen.
|
|
|
why did polo this? i can't find information on their website. and nothing on twitter.
Apparently the same thing happened last week and I never noticed... and there was no real official explanation. *note to self, keep your trading ltc on bitrex. 
|
|
|
The Litecoin market is frozen on polo. This is going to cost many people thousands of dollars or save them thousands I suppose. Its bs regardless.
20% of my holding is ltc (only 5% in Polo) And about 25% of my mining is ltc and Burst... bad 24hrs. 
|
|
|
Despite the majority of analysts, including long term advocates, saying that it's overheated and way overvalued, I guess the sheer volume of hitherto observing speculators are keeping the bear at bay. Price is stubbornly keeping just above 2000.
ETH comeuppance not quite there yet, although all talk of the flippening should quiet down.
Getting a y2k vibe to this whole thing. Concentrate on the news worthy big scary thing, which isn't an issue (y2k/btc hard fork), meanwhile what's going to destroy your profolio is the fact that the market is bloated, overvalued and most coins/companies provide nothing. And just like the .com burst, only those who have can deliver a true product will survive, and continue on to make people money.... after they dip, cause no one gets out unscathed.
|
|
|
I d suggest you read a bit before asking people to spoon feed you with information you should know if you want to mine.
Mining and not understanding the concept of difficulty is like wanting to drive a car and understanding what does your engine do.
I've worked in 4 different industries, and consulted on many different sites/projects, with god knows how many different variables. I am no stranger to being over your head, and not being prepared (you actually never can prepare enough for most situations). If there's one thing I've learned, it's jump in, take your lumps, you will emerge an expert on the way out.
|
|
|
So short answer is, there is 0 probability. Btc goes down, they all go down with it.... but hear me out on this.
At a point btc will bottom, I figured mid August it would hit mid $1,900, then go stable from there.... ahhhhhh....... yah, that happened a month early. 😄
My back up bottom went all the way down to $1,200. 😳 Scary, but I think it's a realistic, worse case scenario.
So if btc hits $1,200, you're looking at things like ltc @ $16-$14, ETH @ $80, Dash @ $65, etc... and that looks outrageously unrealistic. Bottom of ltc I can't see going past $28, ETH $120, Dash $100.
So the question I throw out there, do you see a scenario in which when the dust settles, btc finally finds its bottom, and % wise, the other "big" alt-coins actually lost less?
|
|
|
Why the hell would you buy a pre-order on eBay anyways? From all the places...
Very obvious scam, I hope nobody buys it. Also, why would they talk about ROI when this """ships""" in Q1 2018 and difficulty will be much higher due to L3+s flooding the market? Nonsense.
I do too. It's one thing to buy a $8,000 of Rx 470 ETH rigs, that probably will not make back half the money before its no longer profitable, least you get some hands on experience for your loss. It's entirely different story not getting anything for your money, besides a swift kick in the grapes. I've seen that picture before, attached to a scam site.
Been a few months though, I don't remember the name of the alleged maker offhand.
Its ehsminer, they had the same "product" back in 2014.
|
|
|
Does this really matter?
I think it depends on when you got in. Had I been in for a long time, I would care less right now, because my initial investment would have already been paid off. I bought in during the May dip, btc @$2,000, ltc @ $36, and ETH at $180. I sold a good portion 2 weeks ago, and have been using it to buy and sell the bounces because if I can take out my initial investment, at that point I have 0 probability of losing money in this endeavor, and will be sitting in your spot... not caring and waiting for the eventual recovery.
|
|
|
https://www.ebay.com/itm/162589060273So at this point ehs has got to be a scam, you can't be in business for 4-5 years and not have a product when your first product was supposed to be out in 2014... or maybe they have very deep pockets, and because their million dollar primary jobs take up most of their time, they just haven't had the time to finish their product.  Anyways, was wondering... do you think the eBay seller has been duped, and he thinks he's getting this thing, or do you think he knowingly is scamming people? I did look to message the guy, but can't find it on his profile, also was seeing if their was a way to report it, without dinging the seller... couldn't find it either.
|
|
|
|