 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
|
what is the biggest pool for Innova?
Bsod is only 15% of net.
|
|
|
|
|
another useless coin on bad algo.
Protected from ASIC, but who the hell gonna protect from NH?
|
|
|
|
i'm using vertminer for lyra2rev2 (which is a fork of ccminer that a dev for VTC did)
any link? |
|
|
|
ROFL!
Miner is mining, altcoins autoconverted, revenue is as expected. So whats so funny?  |
|
|
|
I can confirm the Lyra2rev2 issue is entirely ccminer related and nothing to do with the pool. If you try https://github.com/Nanashi-Meiyo-Meijin/ccminer/releases/tag/v2.2-mod-r2 which is a fork with improved lyra2RE2, hashrates are greatly improved and what's displayed on site is pretty much the same as locally. You might need to be sure your nvidia software is totally up to date (388.59) Thats what Im talking about 2 days already and 5 pages.  Zclassic should be mined though: WTM shows 0.026 24hr revenue VS 0.018 on Mona... |
|
|
|
CCminer Lyra2Rev2 hashrate issue OK, guys. So I've seen many post here re: hash rate reported by pool is 10-40% lower than reported by miner. I personally noticed 25% discrepancy while mining vertcoin a few days ago. Admins suggested (see a few pages back) the issue was limited to Lyra2Rev2 and was most likely miner's fault rather than pool's problem. The table below summarises the results of my test. So if you choose to mine Lyra2Rev2 coins be prepared to have lower revenues than predicted. GPU 2x GTX 1070 2x GTX 1070 clocks +150,+500, 70% +150,+500, 70% driver 372.54 372.54 miner Ccminer 2.2 Ccminer 2.2 pool MPH Suprnova coin / algo Monacoin / Lyra2Rev2 Monacoin / Lyra2Rev2 mining time, h 24 24 Hashrate from miner, MH/s 68.7 68 Average hashrate from pool, MH/s ~58 ~58 Total shares / invalid shares 5610 / 1 5158 / 0 Predicted revenue (Whattomine), Mona 0.42 0.42 Actual revenue, Mona 0.36 0.34 Question to admins: since you are aware of the problem, why not make it clear on the website (just make a note)? Lyra2Rev2 coins are the most profitable at the moment and people on autoswitch will probably mine those vertcoins and monacoins expecting the highest yield while mining lower profitability coins (e.g. equihash zencash or BTG) may in fact be more profitable (given those algos do not have the same problem as Lyra, that is I'm going to test today). Nice... Thanks for the test  so whats the point? More shares = more money. And?.. |
|
|
|
................ On miningpoolhub I've still much lower estimated hashrate than in miner. The same as previously...
I know it's should be the same because it's estimated with my sent shares - but both miningpoolhub and suprnovashows much lower hashrate and earnings compared to mining using other algorithms (coins).
Nope, my dashboard shows correct hashrates. Sometimes its lagging, but in 1 hr it settles down and shows legit values. |
|
|
|
..........................
I use ccminer-x64-2.2.3-cuda9 and NVIDIA driver version 23.21.13.8843 from 27/11/2017
Now there is new NVIDIA driver from 07/12/2017 but I can't decide do I want it or not, because finally I see what I should see.....
Sorry for my $0.02: you are using wrong miner and wrong driver. Therefore you are loosing approximately 18+% of hashing power and profit (according to my calculations). You have to use ccMiner 2.2 fork by Nanashi Meiyo-Meijin For MonaCoin Mining miner: just download it and rename to ccminer-x64.exe if necessary (f.e. minerwatcher.com service which I use requires it). Driver also should be the latest: 388.59 gives the most hashrate in Lyra2re2 I've seen so far. my old ccminer from 2015 gives me better hashrate (same as the one used in OCM without the 2% fee) Link please. |
|
|
|
well you might want to remove that link so no one else clicks it.
I will not. Miner is working just fine. |
|
|
|
^ I went to check out this guys link, tons of comments saying they were hacked for ethereum
I dont mine ethereum. |
|
|
|
..........................
I use ccminer-x64-2.2.3-cuda9 and NVIDIA driver version 23.21.13.8843 from 27/11/2017
Now there is new NVIDIA driver from 07/12/2017 but I can't decide do I want it or not, because finally I see what I should see.....
Sorry for my $0.02: you are using wrong miner and wrong driver. Therefore you are loosing approximately 18+% of hashing power and profit (according to my calculations). You have to use ccMiner 2.2 fork by Nanashi Meiyo-Meijin For MonaCoin Mining miner: just download it and rename to ccminer-x64.exe if necessary (f.e. minerwatcher.com service which I use requires it). Driver also should be the latest: 388.59 gives the most hashrate in Lyra2re2 I've seen so far. Video with old standard miner and older driver. As you can see with PL 100 GPU 100 RAM 770 hashrate never goes above 287MHs Right now with latest drivers and 2-2fork miner and PL 95GPU 100 RAM 700I got 353MHs. Think about it. [2017-12-11 17:59:56] GPU #3: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 70.99 MH/s
[2017-12-11 17:59:57] GPU #1: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 73.80 MH/s
[2017-12-11 18:00:01] GPU #4: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 69.55 MH/s
[2017-12-11 18:00:01] GPU #2: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 69.29 MH/s
[2017-12-11 18:00:01] GPU #0: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 70.94 MH/s
[2017-12-11 18:00:08] GPU #3: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 70.59 MH/s
[2017-12-11 18:00:09] GPU #1: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 73.43 MH/s
[2017-12-11 18:00:13] GPU #4: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 69.31 MH/s
[2017-12-11 18:00:13] GPU #2: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 69.73 MH/s
[2017-12-11 18:00:14] GPU #0: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 70.61 MH/s
[2017-12-11 18:00:21] GPU #3: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 70.31 MH/s
[2017-12-11 18:00:21] GPU #1: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 73.49 MH/s
[2017-12-11 18:00:22] accepted: 176/176 (diff 1.528), 353.37 MH/s yes!
[2017-12-11 18:00:22] GPU #2: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 69.64 MH/s
[2017-12-11 18:00:22] accepted: 177/177 (diff 3.568), 353.40 MH/s yes! Dashboard reports even more:  |
|
|
|
So is this better than Ewbf for Zec mining?
so far not quite. On 1080ti's I cant get better than 2.6%. power consumption is roughly the same. What bad is that miner is unstable and on nicehash pool creates a lot of rejected shares. I switched back to EWBF and 100% shares are good. |
|
|
|
# GPU1 server set difficulty to: 000787878780000000000000...
GPU0 58C Sol/s: 769.8 Sol/W: 3.26 Avg: 770.9 I/s: 412.4 Sh: 5.21 0.99 110
> GPU1 54C Sol/s: 772.0 Sol/W: 3.25 Avg: 769.5 I/s: 412.1 Sh: 4.91 1.00 94
> GPU2 54C Sol/s: 765.0 Sol/W: 3.26 Avg: 771.9 I/s: 412.7 Sh: 5.41 1.00 125
> GPU3 51C Sol/s: 761.7 Sol/W: 3.24 Avg: 765.0 I/s: 410.2 Sh: 5.65 1.00 109
# GPU0 server set difficulty to: 000f0f0f0f00000000000000...
> GPU4 59C Sol/s: 791.0 Sol/W: 3.01 Avg: 794.9 I/s: 425.8 Sh: 5.38 0.98 98
========== Sol/s: 3859.5 Sol/W: 3.21 Avg: 3872.1 I/s: 2073.2 Sh: 26.56 0.99 107
# GPU0 rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
# GPU1 server set difficulty to: 000787878780000000000000...
# GPU2 server set difficulty to: 000787878780000000000000...
# GPU0 rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
# GPU0 rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
> GPU0 58C Sol/s: 765.2 Sol/W: 3.26 Avg: 770.8 I/s: 412.4 Sh: 5.32 0.97 94
> GPU1 54C Sol/s: 772.7 Sol/W: 3.25 Avg: 769.5 I/s: 412.1 Sh: 4.89 1.00 94
# GPU0 rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
> GPU2 54C Sol/s: 769.1 Sol/W: 3.26 Avg: 771.8 I/s: 413.1 Sh: 5.45 1.00 99
> GPU3 51C Sol/s: 774.0 Sol/W: 3.24 Avg: 765.1 I/s: 410.2 Sh: 5.62 1.00 110
> GPU4 59C Sol/s: 805.8 Sol/W: 3.01 Avg: 795.0 I/s: 425.8 Sh: 5.39 0.98 101
========== Sol/s: 3886.8 Sol/W: 3.21 Avg: 3872.2 I/s: 2073.6 Sh: 26.67 0.99 99
# GPU0 rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
GPU0 58C Sol/s: 756.6 Sol/W: 3.26 Avg: 770.6 I/s: 411.8 Sh: 5.40 0.96 85
GPU1 54C Sol/s: 777.7 Sol/W: 3.25 Avg: 769.6 I/s: 411.5 Sh: 4.87 1.00 93
GPU2 54C Sol/s: 771.4 Sol/W: 3.26 Avg: 771.8 I/s: 411.8 Sh: 5.46 1.00 93
GPU3 51C Sol/s: 762.1 Sol/W: 3.24 Avg: 765.1 I/s: 408.9 Sh: 5.62 1.00 101
GPU4 59C Sol/s: 802.3 Sol/W: 3.01 Avg: 795.1 I/s: 424.9 Sh: 5.36 0.98 109
========== Sol/s: 3870.1 Sol/W: 3.21 Avg: 3872.2 I/s: 2068.9 Sh: 26.70 0.99 96
# GPU0 rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
GPU0 58C Sol/s: 771.9 Sol/W: 3.26 Avg: 770.7 I/s: 412.4 Sh: 5.40 0.96 94
GPU1 54C Sol/s: 771.7 Sol/W: 3.25 Avg: 769.7 I/s: 412.1 Sh: 4.84 1.00 109
GPU2 54C Sol/s: 776.8 Sol/W: 3.26 Avg: 771.9 I/s: 412.8 Sh: 5.47 1.00 109
> GPU3 51C Sol/s: 755.8 Sol/W: 3.24 Avg: 765.0 I/s: 410.2 Sh: 5.63 1.00 109
> GPU4 59C Sol/s: 797.6 Sol/W: 3.01 Avg: 795.1 I/s: 425.5 Sh: 5.33 0.98 93
========== Sol/s: 3873.8 Sol/W: 3.21 Avg: 3872.2 I/s: 2073.0 Sh: 26.67 0.99 102
# GPU0 rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
# GPU0 rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
GPU0 58C Sol/s: 771.3 Sol/W: 3.26 Avg: 770.7 I/s: 412.4 Sh: 5.44 0.95 109
GPU1 54C Sol/s: 773.0 Sol/W: 3.25 Avg: 769.7 I/s: 411.8 Sh: 4.82 1.00 109
GPU2 54C Sol/s: 783.0 Sol/W: 3.26 Avg: 772.0 I/s: 413.1 Sh: 5.57 1.00 88
> GPU3 51C Sol/s: 774.8 Sol/W: 3.24 Avg: 765.1 I/s: 409.6 Sh: 5.60 1.00 78
> GPU4 59C Sol/s: 796.3 Sol/W: 3.01 Avg: 795.1 I/s: 426.2 Sh: 5.31 0.98 110
========== Sol/s: 3898.4 Sol/W: 3.21 Avg: 3872.5 I/s: 2073.0 Sh: 26.74 0.99 98
# GPU0 rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
GPU0 58C Sol/s: 768.4 Sol/W: 3.26 Avg: 770.6 I/s: 411.5 Sh: 5.48 0.94 86
GPU1 54C Sol/s: 769.5 Sol/W: 3.25 Avg: 769.7 I/s: 410.8 Sh: 4.81 1.00 94
GPU2 54C Sol/s: 771.3 Sol/W: 3.26 Avg: 772.0 I/s: 411.8 Sh: 5.60 1.00 89
# GPU0 rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
GPU3 51C Sol/s: 767.8 Sol/W: 3.24 Avg: 765.1 I/s: 408.6 Sh: 5.60 1.00 110
GPU4 59C Sol/s: 789.2 Sol/W: 3.01 Avg: 795.0 I/s: 424.6 Sh: 5.25 0.98 110
========== Sol/s: 3866.2 Sol/W: 3.21 Avg: 3872.5 I/s: 2067.2 Sh: 26.74 0.98 97
# GPU0 rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
# GPU0 rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
# GPU0 rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
GPU0 58C Sol/s: 776.9 Sol/W: 3.26 Avg: 770.7 I/s: 412.8 Sh: 5.58 0.92 109
GPU1 54C Sol/s: 774.4 Sol/W: 3.25 Avg: 769.7 I/s: 412.1 Sh: 4.82 1.00 101
GPU2 54C Sol/s: 777.9 Sol/W: 3.26 Avg: 772.1 I/s: 412.8 Sh: 5.54 1.00 89
# GPU0 rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
> GPU3 51C Sol/s: 765.9 Sol/W: 3.24 Avg: 765.1 I/s: 410.2 Sh: 5.57 1.00 94
> GPU4 60C Sol/s: 797.5 Sol/W: 3.01 Avg: 795.1 I/s: 426.2 Sh: 5.23 0.98 110
========== Sol/s: 3892.5 Sol/W: 3.21 Avg: 3872.7 I/s: 2074.0 Sh: 26.74 0.98 100
GPU0 58C Sol/s: 773.4 Sol/W: 3.26 Avg: 770.7 I/s: 412.1 Sh: 5.68 0.92 97
GPU1 54C Sol/s: 768.1 Sol/W: 3.25 Avg: 769.7 I/s: 411.8 Sh: 4.83 1.00 78
GPU2 54C Sol/s: 772.1 Sol/W: 3.26 Avg: 772.1 I/s: 413.0 Sh: 5.58 1.00 88
> GPU3 51C Sol/s: 765.2 Sol/W: 3.24 Avg: 765.1 I/s: 409.9 Sh: 5.58 1.00 86
> GPU4 59C Sol/s: 790.9 Sol/W: 3.01 Avg: 795.0 I/s: 425.8 Sh: 5.20 0.98 78
========== Sol/s: 3869.8 Sol/W: 3.21 Avg: 3872.6 I/s: 2072.7 Sh: 26.87 0.98 85
GPU0 58C Sol/s: 769.1 Sol/W: 3.26 Avg: 770.7 I/s: 412.4 Sh: 5.68 0.92 78
# GPU0 rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
GPU1 54C Sol/s: 774.9 Sol/W: 3.25 Avg: 769.8 I/s: 412.1 Sh: 4.78 1.00 78
GPU2 54C Sol/s: 768.0 Sol/W: 3.26 Avg: 772.0 I/s: 412.7 Sh: 5.52 1.00 88
GPU3 50C Sol/s: 763.2 Sol/W: 3.24 Avg: 765.1 I/s: 409.9 Sh: 5.55 1.00 94
GPU4 59C Sol/s: 798.4 Sol/W: 3.01 Avg: 795.1 I/s: 424.6 Sh: 5.15 0.98 78
========== Sol/s: 3873.7 Sol/W: 3.21 Avg: 3872.6 I/s: 2071.7 Sh: 26.68 0.98 83
GPU0 58C Sol/s: 764.8 Sol/W: 3.26 Avg: 770.7 I/s: 411.5 Sh: 5.65 0.91 94
# GPU0 rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null] whats that? |
|
|
|
Small, 2.6% improvement over EWBF. GPU0 58C Sol/s: 773.2 Sol/W: 3.25 Avg: 767.5 I/s: 411.1 Sh: 5.37 1.00 104 ++
GPU2 53C Sol/s: 761.2 Sol/W: 3.26 Avg: 770.4 I/s: 412.8 Sh: 5.34 1.00 105 +
GPU1 54C Sol/s: 775.9 Sol/W: 3.25 Avg: 769.0 I/s: 411.8 Sh: 6.73 1.00 94 +
> GPU3 51C Sol/s: 763.2 Sol/W: 3.23 Avg: 762.8 I/s: 408.9 Sh: 7.12 1.00 95 +++
> GPU4 58C Sol/s: 715.0 Sol/W: 3.01 Avg: 794.3 I/s: 384.9 Sh: 7.15 1.00 82
========== Sol/s: 3788.6 Sol/W: 3.20 Avg: 3863.9 I/s: 2029.5 Sh: 31.72 1.00 96
> GPU0 58C Sol/s: 754.5 Sol/W: 3.24 Avg: 767.4 I/s: 410.2 Sh: 5.36 1.00 93 +
> GPU2 53C Sol/s: 774.4 Sol/W: 3.26 Avg: 770.4 I/s: 412.1 Sh: 5.36 1.00 99 +++
> GPU1 54C Sol/s: 767.6 Sol/W: 3.25 Avg: 769.0 I/s: 410.8 Sh: 6.72 1.00 109 +
GPU3 52C Sol/s: 759.5 Sol/W: 3.23 Avg: 762.8 I/s: 408.3 Sh: 7.13 1.00 103 +++
GPU4 59C Sol/s: 788.9 Sol/W: 3.01 Avg: 794.2 I/s: 424.2 Sh: 7.16 1.00 104 +++
========== Sol/s: 3844.9 Sol/W: 3.20 Avg: 3863.8 I/s: 2065.7 Sh: 31.72 1.00 101
> GPU0 58C Sol/s: 769.4 Sol/W: 3.24 Avg: 767.4 I/s: 410.8 Sh: 5.33 1.00 93
> GPU2 53C Sol/s: 767.3 Sol/W: 3.26 Avg: 770.4 I/s: 412.8 Sh: 5.36 1.00 94 ++
> GPU1 54C Sol/s: 772.1 Sol/W: 3.25 Avg: 769.0 I/s: 411.5 Sh: 6.70 1.00 110 +
> GPU3 52C Sol/s: 760.5 Sol/W: 3.23 Avg: 762.7 I/s: 408.9 Sh: 7.11 1.00 93 +
> GPU4 59C Sol/s: 807.5 Sol/W: 3.01 Avg: 794.3 I/s: 425.6 Sh: 7.14 1.00 94 +
========== Sol/s: 3876.8 Sol/W: 3.20 Avg: 3863.9 I/s: 2069.6 Sh: 31.64 1.00 96
GPU0 58C Sol/s: 752.8 Sol/W: 3.24 Avg: 767.4 I/s: 411.2 Sh: 5.32 1.00 94 +
GPU2 53C Sol/s: 770.6 Sol/W: 3.26 Avg: 770.4 I/s: 412.8 Sh: 5.39 1.00 101 ++++
GPU1 54C Sol/s: 767.0 Sol/W: 3.25 Avg: 769.0 I/s: 411.2 Sh: 6.69 1.00 102 ++
> GPU3 52C Sol/s: 755.2 Sol/W: 3.23 Avg: 762.7 I/s: 408.6 Sh: 7.12 1.00 96 +++
> GPU4 59C Sol/s: 796.0 Sol/W: 3.01 Avg: 794.3 I/s: 425.5 Sh: 7.19 1.00 90 ++++++
========== Sol/s: 3841.6 Sol/W: 3.20 Avg: 3863.8 I/s: 2069.3 Sh: 31.72 1.00 96
|
|
|
|
which temps should you consider safe temps for this model? and maximum temps?
82 is way too much. From what I know temp should be no more than 70.  |
|
|
|
|
