 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
Why is bitcoin price stuck around the same number and not increasing, how likely is it for bitcoin to steadily start going up again?
Are you sure it's not increasing: 16 months ago: $4 12 months ago: $6 8 months ago: $10 4 months ago: $35 today: $100 It all depends on your perspective, doesn't it? A nice but mainly a TRUE perspective. that was before asics. now you can say this 2 month ago $250 1 month ago $130 today $80 also true. so huge as peak and big fall. i think asics are bitcoin biggest devaluer |
|
|
|
Capitalism and Socialism is Collectivism. It's the same Bullshit. Private property is always sub-property, which is guaranteed by the state, because with this private sub-property, the tax payer is able to generate taxed surpluses. Without a state, there is no such thing as a private property.
Sorry, but capitalism and socialism aren't even remotely similar.  meen that picture is bullshit you are a fool |
|
|
|
i have seen that, but thats a 16x to 16x is it the same for 1x 16x? |
|
|
|
|
Hey! i have some 1x to 16x pci-e risers, they work fine but i seen in this forum that they might burn up if they are not powered.
i would buy some powered ones, actually i did. but i wont get them for a week and i was thinking maybe i can power my old risers myself
i seen pictures and it looks quite easy. anyone has some instructions for doing this?
thanks a bunch!
|
|
|
|
|
so when is next diff jump??
|
|
|
|
They wouldn't openly do it but they still could and not make it public. Besides even if they regularly and publicly exceeded 51% there's nothing in the software to self-destruct bitcoin - most people would turn a blind eye because they would have too much invested already to see it all disappear. Meanwhile ASICMiner would continue minting most of the new coins and become a monopoly that nobody could challenge.
The only way to prevent this happening is to modify the software so that miners could use either sha256 or scrypt to mine blocks - this will mean that GPU's can carry on contributing and it would be impossible for ASICMiner (or any other ASIC monopoly) to become a majority simply because even they could solve all of the sha256 blocks, the sha256 difficulty would get too high and then more blocks would be found with scrypt.
thats a great idea. hope it gets somewhere! really clever thinking |
|
|
|
I have a rig 4 x 7990 (8 cores total), working with win 7 64 bit.
damnnn thats like 5ghs!!! |
|
|
|
|
you can buy usb erupters for like 2btc or blades for 5000 dollars.
you might think of making a buy grup and get the 50 usbs for 100btc
eventhough i think its not worth it. maybe the blades are
|
|
|
|
|
also its winter here and my gpus are heating my room as they mine so i dont have to use my electric heater!
take that illuminati lol XDD
|
|
|
|
|
so some 'elite' ppl who have accses to avalon are printing money and shitting on thousands of gpu miner while we see our gpus go worthless and its even worthless to buy asics couse its too expensive and most of the time you wont even get it shipped anytime soon.
sounds fishy indeed
illuminati took over btc!
|
|
|
|
Sorry.. My Fault... I should have said 21 million as in bitcoin availability
It's going to take years for us to get to 21 MM, if that is what you call just around the corner then you have some surprises coming your way. whattt what do you mean MM??? we will be at 21M in cuple of weeks... but 21MM whos even thinking of that? am i wrong?? |
|
|
|
|
Next available bid: 50% @ 0.3 BTC
ill go with those .3 btc!
i dont really get this but i want to buy 0.3 btc of what u are sellin
|
|
|
|
|
got it
A 5 second exponentially decaying average hash rate
An all time average hash rate
An all time average hash rate based on actual accepted shares
|
|
|
|
GPU 1: 73.5C 2551RPM | 427.3/443.0Mh/s | A:8 R:0 HW:0 U:4.39/m Each column is as follows: Temperature (if supported) Fanspeed (if supported) A 5 second exponentially decaying average hash rate
An all time average hash rateThe number of accepted shares The number of rejected shares The number of hardware erorrs The utility defines as the number of shares / minute from https://github.com/ckolivas/cgminergreat thanks! but what about the third mhs rate???its always the higher for me |
|
|
|
|
bfgminer version 2.10.8 - Started: [2013-06-05 18:10:06] - [ 0 days 00:32:34]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5s:783.1 avg:779.5 u:800.7 Mh/s | A:364 R:0 S:0 HW:38 U:11.2/m
ST: 2 DW: 262 GW: 66 LW: 978 GF: 0 NB: 3 AS: 0 RF: 0 E: 5.28
Connected to mint.bitminter.com diff 1 with stratum as user bitmateco_mateco1
Block: ...4715bc45 #239954 Diff:15.6M Started: [18:29:23] Best share: 243
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[P]ool management [G]PU management [S ]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
OCL 0: 79.5C 3937RPM | 358.1/358.5/367.3Mh/s | A:167 R:0 HW:38 U: 5.13/m
OCL 1: 70.5C 3020RPM | 423.4/422.5/433.3Mh/s | A:197 R:0 HW: 0 U: 6.05/m
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
also whats the 5s:783.1 avg:779.5 u:800.7 Mh/s???
i fiugred out its something like 5 seconds? adgarege? and didnt figure anything for the u lol
|
|
|
|
|
and do you know any way i can save clock, speed and voltage settings for 2 diferent gpus in cfgminer?
and how to change worksize in cfgminer? for only 1gpu at a time?
|
|
|
|
|
thanks 4 reply,
but i mean
352.8/349.8/383.7Mh/s
whats that? why is 352 in one side and 383 in the other, evry setttings change i do seems to high one and lower the other
|
|
|
|
also i dont understand whats the agression? is it the same tthan intencity?  and what its role? ? |
|
|
|
|
[P]ool management [G]PU management [S ]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
OCL 0: 92.5C 3978RPM | 352.8/349.8/383.7Mh/s | A:242 R:3 HW:0 U: 5.36/m
OCL 1: 70.5C 3007RPM | 422.7/421.7/428.1Mh/s | A:270 R:5 HW:0 U: 5.98/m
so what are those numbers??? whats the difference within the first the second and the third one? with is the actual mhs rate? thnaksss and sorry for my noobnessss
just getting started
|
|
|
|
|
