 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
So I have been reading up on this thread and saw that a lot of people say they are not getting the same hash rates at the pool as what the local miner reports. This has had me worried. I run a small farm and I directed all my cards to use the hsrminer. I have taken one card out of the batch and created a new Nicehash wallet, to see exactly what hsrminer does. 1. On my side the miner disconnects every hour and mines for about 30-60 seconds to the devs wallet. 2. Below the hash rate reported by the miner. This is a evga 1070 running at 70 power target - 137 core and 495 mem. The miner reports an avg of 1088 kH/s  3. Below the stats from Nicehash  So to me it looks like it is submitting what it is reporting locally, actually slightly more. Hope it helps |
|
|
|
|
where is the block explorer?
|
|
|
|
|
Someone care to share when mining lyra2v2 why it mines MobileCash?
I see that coin isnt actively trading and my profits have dropped due to this.
|
|
|
|
None that I'm aware of; the exchanges are not performed by the pool (the exchanges are Bittrex, Yobit and Poloniex).
Please can you provide the information that you are looking at to make the comparison?
I am not even going to bother. This pool is dubious, here-today-gone-tomorrow. |
|
|
|
|
Are there any issues again with BTC auto exchange?
I have only received half of what I am suppose t receive. Whats going on with this pool?
|
|
|
|
|
@aaronsace
why is it mining to hashrefinery to your btc address even though only MPH was selected? My rigs almost mined 2 hours to that address using a certain ccminer version.
|
|
|
|
So i tried your MultiPoolMiner.
Hmm, been mining Monacoin over the night and my hash rates were 68MH/s with a single 1080ti. I only used one card to test your script.
Yet the pool only reports 35MH/s. Care to share where the rest went to. Donation is switched off. Not that I wouldn't donate, but for testing purposes it was set to off. Please explain to me why I only see half the hash rates on the pool. Your script chose Palgins CCminer, but my other rigs use Nahashi and the hash rates are normal.
Also, even though I entered my username in the start bat file, there are still over 30 files that contain your workernames in them and they are being used when bench-marked.
MPM actually has Nanashi, two versions actually. You can disable Palgin by going into the miners folder and select the Palgin ccminer and right click and select edit, and place a # in front of Lyra2v2. You can then do the same to enable both Nanashi's, just remove the #. Thank you for your reply. However, why does the miner report 68MH/s yet only half of it ends on the pool? Where is the rest going? |
|
|
|
so i have read people wanna to leave MPH and some people showing some tests. Is this pool ligit or are people running for the hills?
I raised my power two days ago on 19 MH/s. Instead of increasing my profits, I get less coins than before. The whole network did not grow in capacity. So it is not necessary to say here that the coin network itself is to blame for this. So the pool steals and does not act honestly. This is the coin of XZC. for me too with zcoin. From the 9th of December the number of coins mined fell about 20-25%. 2 farms (~173mh\s and ~75mh\s) in different locations, the result is the same, the loss of 20-25% of coins Please don't assume it's stealing. There are many reasons for losses in real pools. So i tried your MultiPoolMiner. Hmm, been mining Monacoin over the night and my hash rates were 68MH/s with a single 1080ti. I only used one card to test your script. Yet the pool only reports 35MH/s. Care to share where the rest went to. Donation is switched off. Not that I wouldn't donate, but for testing purposes it was set to off. Please explain to me why I only see half the hash rates on the pool. Your script chose Palgins CCminer, but my other rigs use Nahashi and the hash rates are normal. Also, even though I entered my username in the start bat file, there are still over 30 files that contain your workernames in them and they are being used when bench-marked. |
|
|
|
|
Why is my BTC disappearing from the pool?
|
|
|
|
|
Is a secure node the same as a masternode?
Where can we find info or a doc how to setup a masternode?
|
|
|
|
it's possible, but we need some ios staff for developing and testing. but our apps are ready for ios.
thanks for interesting. we will talk about ios support.
Is the app available on TestFlight for beta testing? |
|
|
|
Hi
on the SIGT pool, who is the top anonymous user?
I never see an anonymous user at the top with the highest hash rates, yet he gets the highest share rate, by a mile.
I also then thought it might be ALL anonymous users combined, but that is not the case either.
@72% Round shares, that user should be mining at 17-18GH, but I dont see that user.
Under now circumstances will we share account names of users who have chosen to remain anonymous within the system. We had several miners connect and mine within the range of 15 - 100GH, those people most probably have bought computing power and directed it towards our pool for a specific period of time. This is not uncommon and you can chose to do this yourself if you have the BTC to spare. I think you missed my point. I do not want to know the identity of the user. The point I am trying to make - there is an anonymous user that constantly gets 70-80% of the round shares, yet, I DO NOT see him in the Pool list ever mining. He would show up there, not so? As I said, that person is probably renting time to mine with huge hash power, getting the majority of shares, then leaving until a block has been found. Thus getting an huge amount of the block reward. While everyone can do this and its a 'strategy', do you suggest banning that user? So what you're essentially saying is, I can mine for only a few minutes of a round, considering I have the highest hash rate, and still receive the majority of shares, even if the round took let's say an hour? If that is the case I wouldn't call this a strategy, rather a flaw/loophole or exploiting the system. Is this happening only on mpos driven pools? |
|
|
|
Hi
on the SIGT pool, who is the top anonymous user?
I never see an anonymous user at the top with the highest hash rates, yet he gets the highest share rate, by a mile.
I also then thought it might be ALL anonymous users combined, but that is not the case either.
@72% Round shares, that user should be mining at 17-18GH, but I dont see that user.
Under now circumstances will we share account names of users who have chosen to remain anonymous within the system. We had several miners connect and mine within the range of 15 - 100GH, those people most probably have bought computing power and directed it towards our pool for a specific period of time. This is not uncommon and you can chose to do this yourself if you have the BTC to spare. I think you missed my point. I do not want to know the identity of the user. The point I am trying to make - there is an anonymous user that constantly gets 70-80% of the round shares, yet, I DO NOT see him in the Pool list ever mining. He would show up there, not so? |
|
|
|
|
Hi
on the SIGT pool, who is the top anonymous user?
I never see an anonymous user at the top with the highest hash rates, yet he gets the highest share rate, by a mile.
I also then thought it might be ALL anonymous users combined, but that is not the case either.
@72% Round shares, that user should be mining at 17-18GH, but I dont see that user.
|
|
|
|
|
There is no movement on GitHub. What are the devs doing?
|
|
|
|
|
Almost 2018 and still no Tapatalk support.
See my post count? That's exactly the reason why it's so low.
I would be far more active if I wouldn't have to deal with the ceappy rendering of this site on a mobile device.
The beta site is also, well, just in beta. Feels more like alpha though on the iPhone.
|
|
|
|
|
All blocks are orphaned on vuc?
|
|
|
|
|
@Krisso what is the TX fee for? I've noticed it's 5 coins each time. Is this correct?
Nvm. I see it's a on-demand TX fee.
|
|
|
|
Thanks @Krisso
Did anything change on the var diff side of things?
Individual Difficulty is a lot higher on your pool compared to others. Started about 45 min ago. I received timeouts and then it reconnected. But since then the diff is up by a lot.
Yeah we tweaked the diff settings to lower share submission rates and bump share difficulty - which should end up being the same reported hash rate as you're just submitting more difficult shares. Could you report your numbers after you let your rigs mine for 15 minutes? That would help - so we can make manual adjustments  Well, I am seeing quite a few shares not being accepted accepted: 6/7 (diff 3.519), 48.47 MH/s booooo I find if the difficulty is very high and something goes wrong connection wise, whatever you worked on might be invalid? Inst there less margin of error if the difficulty set to lower? Or let me rephrase, is there a benefit of having a higher difficulty oppose to a lower one? CHC has been very stable for weeks, would be great if we can get SIGT stable too Thanks for all the effort. Tested a bunch more and lowered the target time some more - we want to stick to these numbers for now. Miners and hash rates are looking good overall. Ok. My hashrate is definitely down from 265/270 to 234. Will let it run for a bit longer but doubt it will make a difference. Don't forget block difficulty went up too, there are several factors for fluctuating hash-rates. I switched to a different miner this morning. All is back to normal on my side after switching back to the previous miner version. |
|
|
|
|
