@Claymore
Is it possible for the RX480-8GB to reach the hash of 43 MH / s in ETH?
I do not know how, but I have 3 RX480 doing between 41 and 43 MH / s running version 9.5
In the link below I put an image with the Miner screen
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fimgur.com%2FGknhj0x&t=663&c=CD06JH3FtMShfw)
Is this information extracted from Miner being generated in the wrong way?
Is it possible for the RX480-8GB to reach the hash of 43 MH / s in ETH?
I do not know how, but I have 3 RX480 doing between 41 and 43 MH / s running version 9.5
In the link below I put an image with the Miner screen
Is this information extracted from Miner being generated in the wrong way?
That really is strange. My rigs are producing more shares per hour, per GPU, than that - at 28.8Mh/s. Let's go along with this and assume it's NOT a Photoshop job. Maybe a super fast hash, lots of bad incorrect shares, still don't understand how it would stay alive for 150 hours. Doesn't really matter of it's not producing good shares.
During the 150 hours neither was incorrect share or failed, but I know if the reported value was real. No, Photoshop did not job