 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
Thanks for the update.
Any recommended configuration for 1080ti rig? is it better to just run the miner with -i 15 or -i auto 1024 8192 256?
Are you on MTP? To find the best settings I would start without OC and run default intensity. As soon as the hashrate is stable I would increase intensity. Repeat that until you do not see higher hashrates. Then use the best intensity. After that you can play with some OC and see if that have any impact to your system. Sorry that I do not have a more 'concrete' advice, but systems are too different to give general hints that fits all of them. Thanks for the quick reply, yeah I'm on MTP, just wanted te see if there was a tested base point to start off. about my other question, which type of intensity would you recommend tu use a) -i 14, b) -i auto 1024 8192 256, c) -gi,gs ? thanks I would start without -i. The miner will tell you which default intensity it uses for your gpu. Then wait for a stable hashrate and restart with a higher intensity (-i) until you see that it doesn't rise anymore. -i auto takes a very long time (and please do not forget to add -log to your command line so that you can see the best settings for your gpu.) I general I assume that the sweet point is default intensity + 1 or +2 - just in case you want to have a fast result. awesome thanks |
|
|
|
Thanks for the update.
Any recommended configuration for 1080ti rig? is it better to just run the miner with -i 15 or -i auto 1024 8192 256?
Are you on MTP? To find the best settings I would start without OC and run default intensity. As soon as the hashrate is stable I would increase intensity. Repeat that until you do not see higher hashrates. Then use the best intensity. After that you can play with some OC and see if that have any impact to your system. Sorry that I do not have a more 'concrete' advice, but systems are too different to give general hints that fits all of them. Thanks for the quick reply, yeah I'm on MTP, just wanted te see if there was a tested base point to start off. about my other question, which type of intensity would you recommend tu use a) -i 14, b) -i auto 1024 8192 256, c) -gi,gs ? thanks |
|
|
|
New version 2.2.3 release.
These are the modification - I have had to modify some of the core functions so that they become OS independent. So please check if this version works as expected. If not please reinstall 2.2.2 and report the issues to me so that I can fix them.
- Fixed a file sharing bug.
- Changed Thread-functions to be OS independent.
- Changed File I/O to be OS independent.
- Fixed a the time-interval for updatechecks.
- Shows information how long the Merkle Tree generation took (MTP only).
- Shows the current mining block if the information was available in mining notify.
- Shows optimized grid- and blocksize that is used for the Kernel.
- Add power usage information into API information. Requires Awesome Miner Version 6.3.4 or later.
- ProgPoW: Show when a new algo is created (New Epoch for BCI, otherwise after 50 block).
- ProgPoW: Calculate optimized blocksize for each new algo.
- ProgPoW: Add version used by Zano.
- ProgPoW/MTP: Small performance improvements.
Happy mining!
Thanks for the update. Any recommended configuration for 1080ti rig on MTP? is it better to just run the miner with -i 15 or -i auto 1024 8192 256? |
|
|
|
hashrate drop after devfee session on MTP algo, can you check?
Same happend to me, I was mining around 14.4 Mh/s, after de devfee kicked it went down to 13.1 Mh/s and didn't come back up to the 14s You'll still be better off with TT-miner for MTP. TrailingStop's done a good job on that algo, and I doubt you'll see any improvement using CryptoDredge. Thanks, I'm gonna try it out, by any chance is there a no dev fee miner? You can use no-fee miners like the CCminer, but with very low hashrate. Or you pay a small fee for the highest possible hashrate. Math is yours  Yeah, I tried ccminer but it is way slower than CD and TT, I wanted to compare live all miners, thanks |
|
|
|
hashrate drop after devfee session on MTP algo, can you check?
Same happend to me, I was mining around 14.4 Mh/s, after de devfee kicked it went down to 13.1 Mh/s and didn't come back up to the 14s You'll still be better off with TT-miner for MTP. TrailingStop's done a good job on that algo, and I doubt you'll see any improvement using CryptoDredge. Thanks, I'm gonna try it out, by any chance is there a no dev fee miner? |
|
|
|
hashrate drop after devfee session on MTP algo, can you check?
Same happend to me, I was mining around 14.4 Mh/s, after de devfee kicked it went down to 13.1 Mh/s and didn't come back up to the 14s |
|
|
|
New Poolhttps://minadorespool.gqLow 0.2% Fee -a neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://us1.minadorespool.gq:4233 -u WALLET -p c=CELER |
|
|
|
What to mine with 8x1080ti. I'm a fan of lyra2z, but seeing how MPH got swamped with bot-farms, the coin is no longer profitable to mine. The algo is cool though, very easy (or so it seems) on the cards so I'd like to switch to something else, Zcoin is a dead-end anyways.
Why do you think zcoin is a dead-end? I was planning to mine?! You can try CRS (Criptoreal) at https://minadorespool.gq -a lyra2z -o stratum+tcp://us1.minadorespool.gq:4553 -u WALLET -p C=CRS |
|
|
|
https://minadorespool.gq/Low 0.2% feeRemember to spread the hashrate between all poolsHigh and efficient Dynamic Cloud Servers for better hashrate and more stability. Blockchain is being retarded I'll add the connect info when ready DISCORD: https://discord.gg/cJF8749 |
|
|
|
https://minadorespool.gq/Low 0.2% feeRemember to spread the hashrate between all poolsHigh and efficient Dynamic Cloud Servers for better hashrate and more stability. -a neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://us1.minadorespool.gq:4233 -u WALLET -p c=NIHL DISCORD: https://discord.gg/cJF8749 |
|
|
|
https://minadorespool.gq/Low 0.2% feeRemember to spread the hashrate between all poolsHigh and efficient Dynamic Cloud Servers for better hashrate and more stability. -a x11 -o stratum+tcp://us1.minadorespool.gq:3533 -u WALLET -p c=OMEGA DISCORD: https://discord.gg/cJF8749 |
|
|
|
https://minadorespool.gq/Low 0.2% feeRemember to spread the hashrate between all poolsHigh and efficient Dynamic Cloud Servers for better hashrate and more stability. -a lyra2v2 -o stratum+tcp://us1.minadorespool.gq:4533 -u WALLET_ADDRESS -p c=ABS DISCORD: https://discord.gg/cJF8749 |
|
|
|
|
