Bitcoin Forum
June 17, 2024, 05:44:04 AM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1]
1  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: DragonMint T1 16TH/S halongmining.com on: April 29, 2018, 09:25:07 PM
It's been 30 days since the T1 has been released. When will the firmware code be released?
Today. The code was a complete mess so even if I wanted to release it into the public, I didn't want to add it to my cgminer git repository it was such a disaster. It's far less offensive now and stable so I plan to merge it today.

By the way strictly speaking they're only obliged to release the code if someone who owns the hardware requests the code, but we're releasing it anyway.

Thanks CK! FWIW, I am waiting for my April T1 order to arrive.
2  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: DragonMint T1 16TH/S halongmining.com on: April 29, 2018, 07:55:13 PM
It's been 30 days since the T1 has been released. When will the firmware code be released?
3  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: Overt AsicBoost Released today? on: April 10, 2018, 05:02:13 AM
Could Innosilicon have created Halong to avoid sharing its patents with BDPL?

There are strong indications that they are related in some ways. The following post summarizes the key points:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2443327.msg33551682#msg33551682

How can a startup like Halong afford to create prototype device? A mask is a multi-million dollar investment. Is it possible they acquired their chips from another manufacturer or that Halong is actually Innosilicon? My bet is on the latter.

If Innosilicon is supplying chips to Halong, shouldn’t Innosilicon also be obliged to join BDPL if they manufacture chips with the AsicBoost design?
4  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: DragonMint 16TH/S halongmining.com on: March 31, 2018, 07:41:52 PM
Do be sure to try them on both an AB tweaked pool (slush) and one of the far more common non-AB pools
That's pointless. As I pointed out they do NOT run without AB.

Is that because the pool will just reject the shares with modified version? If I understand correctly, there is nothing in the hardware implementation for AB that would make it incompatible with non-AB pools.
5  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: DragonMint 16TH/S halongmining.com on: March 21, 2018, 01:38:37 PM
Thank you CK!  Yes, it will be released under GPL request, however, it is still being prepared for that.  A bit more final step announcements are being prepared by Halong Mining and once that is officially out, then you get to see the naked dragon's underbelly.

and phil, please email your shipping info to usual email or leave it in PM please.


Has Halong released their version of cgminer that supports overt asicboost? I'm curious to see how the finding the colliding work items has been implemented.
Not yet, no. They'll have 30 days from delivering hardware to release their software under the terms of the GPL (provided someone asks for the code who has the hardware.) If they don't release it after that time, I will myself anyway since I've been working on their driver for the last 2 weeks.

Thanks CK and MyRig!
6  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: DragonMint 16TH/S halongmining.com on: March 21, 2018, 03:24:19 AM
Has Halong released their version of cgminer that supports overt asicboost? I'm curious to see how the finding the colliding work items has been implemented.
7  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Innosilicon A5 DashMaster 30.2G 750W on: November 24, 2017, 03:21:48 AM
My average temperature per hash board are 55/60/55 with the max being 68/74/68. Is that too high?
8  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Innosilicon A5 DashMaster 30.2G 750W on: July 23, 2017, 03:13:16 AM
It also depends on how many miners there are and how much of the overall hashrate is comprised of high power ASICs.  If only 10% of the total hashrate (currently 15TH I think) comes from these ASICs, the differential in difficulty will not be a direct correlation to their individual hashing power, but as a percentage increase of total power on the network.  1.5TH would be about 500 A5 Dashmasters, if the batch is that size, so that's 10% of the network.  Add another 750gh from an approximately comparable size Antminer D3 batch size since it's 1/2 as powerful.  So that's 2.25TH of the total new network hash power total of  17.25TH on the network after the first batches of these new models goes online (unless the batches are MUCH larger, which seems unlikely).  So what we're really looking at difficulty wise is a 14% increase in network hashrate give or take a couple percent, so I would expect a differential increase comparable to the increase in total net hash, rather than one directly correlated in a 1:1 ratio based on how much more powerful these particular devices are.

There are also other factors to consider, such as miners leaving the network because the difficulty goes up too high for their profit margins to hold (vis a vis Ethereum), and that will reduce the overall network capacity, slowing the rate of difficulty increase for a while at least.


500 A5 @30GH is equal to 15000MH (15TH). I think it's quite realistic to have the difficulty increase 5-10x by October.
Pages: [1]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!