Show Posts
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 »
|
Small intro. I like this project - nice and fast wallet - like it should be. Transactions are fast and low cost... I sent to cryptopia - but I think the problem is on their end because network shows transaction completed. Looking forward to see this project succeed.
I need somebody to recommend a better exchange though. Thanks
|
|
|
What's the average time for btx deposit to cryptopia? I sent small amount 3 hours ago just to test it, it still doesn't show in my balance. Network shows 90 confirmations... and everything should be ok.
|
|
|
Anyway... this is a disappointment... I'm not willing to give this project another chance - no point in replying... I don't understand why after over 10 tries they still can't put a normal wallet/blockchain package together... when almost everybody else can... I'm not going to waste my time on this discussion. Whoever has wireshark - maybe investigate what's going on with their wallet... because like continuous CPU draw like this is very suspicious - it's almost like either verium or xmr stack configured to use only 1 core of your processor for mining... that's why it's only precisely 25%.
Close your wallet. Go to your lux.conf in your AppData directory, open it and add to it : Launch your wallet I think it's a big shit. setgenerate didn't do anything. Upon closer inspection with hardware monitor - CPU cores operate at ~ 50% when luxcoin wallet is running - this is an obvious signature of a CPU miner... I think they just downpowered it a little bit in the last version... they are stealing people's CPU hash. Some nice features... this must be the best one for them! 
|
|
|
Anyway... this is a disappointment... I'm not willing to give this project another chance - no point in replying... I don't understand why after over 10 tries they still can't put a normal wallet/blockchain package together... when almost everybody else can... I'm not going to waste my time on this discussion. Whoever has wireshark - maybe investigate what's going on with their wallet... because like continuous CPU draw like this is very suspicious - it's almost like either verium or xmr stack configured to use only 1 core of your processor for mining... that's why it's only precisely 25%.
|
|
|
What is setgenerate?
In any case my wallet is synced... continuous CPU draw is 25% - you only need that much for video gaming lol!
|
|
|
I was waiting for the release hoping to see 0.1% cpu usage... but it's not happening... I'm 95% convinced that it's probably because they have a cpu miner built in... there's no other logical explanation.
|
|
|
Why is the cpu usage of the wallet still so ridiculously high? It uses 50% of cpu... when u open windows process viewer - it immediately drops to 25%... hahaha - which makes it even more suspicious. This is so suspicious that I'm going to claim that they are secretly using the wallet and CPU power of users to mine either monero or verium reserve.
 Maybe you download the blockchain ? Nah... download finished a long time ago... it's synced - and minimum CPU draw is 25%... even 5% is ridiculous imo... but 25% and more... and it's pretty much *continuous* - why?? What on earth kind of software is it... the only thing that looks exactly like that is a verium or xmr stack cpu miners I'm using....
|
|
|
Look at your other tasks - NOTHING requires that much CPU power... I know because I do quite a bit of CPU mining myself... the ONLY thing that ever requires such high *continuous* CPU power draw is a CPU MINER! lol That's excatly what luxcoin wallet CPU usage looks like - exactly the same as some CPU miners I'm using.
|
|
|
Why is the cpu usage of the wallet still so ridiculously high? It uses 50% of cpu... when u open windows process viewer - it immediately drops to 25%... hahaha - which makes it even more suspicious. This is so suspicious that I'm going to claim that they are secretly using the wallet and CPU power of users to mine either monero or verium reserve.
|
|
|
I just sent 3.28 luxcoin from my wallet to Cryptopia... but the transaction id is not showing up anywhere... it's been an hour and it didn't take nearly that long last time to send luxcoin... something is up with this... where can I check the transaction status? https://ibb.co/m5m7nRTransaction id is e93106620606eae823dc4cd845b36093ad79187774c87361f8e1f277da4f63ec-000 The wallet has been super laggy for whatever reason - all other progs on my PC are working fine. I hope the super laggy wallet didn't just burn my luxcoins... that would be a first for me  Well explorer http://explorer.luxcore.io don't see your TX , how much confirmations your TX have now? And yes, new wallet release planned at 25th that will resolve lagging issue. The coins have just arrived at Cryptopia wallet... no drama here... I just reacted because it was taking unusual time for the coins to arrive compared to the last time I sent...
|
|
|
Am I going to get a response to this simple question?
Where can I check the transaction ID status? I'm starting to get pissed off here, because I never had a problem like that before...
Doesn't it strike anybody as odd that this project had like 25 wallets updates and not a single one of them actually works? lol...
|
|
|
I just sent 3.28 luxcoin from my wallet to Cryptopia... but the transaction id is not showing up anywhere... it's been an hour and it didn't take nearly that long last time to send luxcoin... something is up with this... where can I check the transaction status? https://ibb.co/m5m7nRTransaction id is e93106620606eae823dc4cd845b36093ad79187774c87361f8e1f277da4f63ec-000 The wallet has been super laggy for whatever reason - all other progs on my PC are working fine. I hope the super laggy wallet didn't just burn my luxcoins... that would be a first for me 
|
|
|
Hi.
Does anybody else experience this problem with Luxcoin wallet - I tried 3 versions and all 3 have a problem - they consume far too much CPU power... I was observing it from 45% all the to 75 and 80% of CPU power, I have a fairly recent intel cpu... so I don't get it why would such a little proggy require so much CPU power... makes no sense at all. Too many times it's "not responding" - every time you click on it... it's just so super annoying and wasteful - because it does increase watt consumption of your CPU... affects performance of other programs and so on. Anyway - is there a workaround for this problem?
The team is aware of this issue and is working on a brand new wallet that will be released any day now. Most people experiencing this issue have lots of transactions from mining, and that seems to slow things down badly. You can send your coins to a new wallet, to decrease transaction count, but keep in mind you will have to wait 36 hours for coins to mature for staking in the new wallet. There is also significant work happening right now on a web wallet  Ok thanks, look forward to checking out the new wallet, I hope the problem is solved. It shouldn't be more than 1-2% peak for CPU consumption like all other wallets imo. Otherwise it's looking good. Thanks 
|
|
|
Hi.
Does anybody else experience this problem with Luxcoin wallet - I tried 3 versions and all 3 have a problem - they consume far too much CPU power... I was observing it from 45% all the to 75 and 80% of CPU power, I have a fairly recent intel cpu... so I don't get it why would such a little proggy require so much CPU power... makes no sense at all. Too many times it's "not responding" - every time you click on it... it's just so super annoying and wasteful - because it does increase watt consumption of your CPU... affects performance of other programs and so on. Anyway - is there a workaround for this problem?
|
|
|
The main problem with POS is that it shows false information - like the estimated time for POS payment - it shows 1 day every day but nothing ever arrives... ok, it's very misleading and looks broken... lol. Trezarcoin has only 1 dev... bloody hell and even that guy figured out how to program POS properly... da hell is wrong with the dozen devs working on Signatum so far? 
|
|
|
My constructive input into this project. Ok guys, devs and so on. Interface with the dude doing the trezarcoin and luxcoin... borrow their experience with their POS... the current POS system needs improvement so guys with 1000 sigt can see something rolling in from time to time... otherwise it's hard to convince people to buy this coin... if it really takes 100,000 sigt to see normal POS - who would invest into it - it's lacking other promised features at the moment - like Privacy... I mean revolutionary privacy coin - say what? Can somebody at least introduce some privacy features into this coin already cause that' the main heading at Signatum.io and this coin has none of the privacy features... so what the heck... do you think serious buyers are that stupid?? 
|
|
|
Well guys what do you expect... Every other coin I have is better than Signatum imo, slick interface, privacy, more features...
Like trezarcoin, luxcoin, zencash, monero, and others...
Signatum has a long way to go in every respect... lol...It's a Sh*tcoin 2 months and no development, and this time is critical... Look at other coins - privacy features, segwit, shzmegwit, and so on... what does this coin have?? That bi*ch ass Doc... Some nationalities never fail to confirm the stereotype... they should make it illegal to conceal it. Would save us all a lot of time and trouble. If I knew Doc was a Pakistani... lol, I would have moved on a long time ago... lol... With a Pakistani in charge it's the outcome that should have been expected.
|
|
|
This thread reads like some true Bollywood drama... I'm starting to wonder if this project would have been better off if Crowetic was allowed to dethrone Doc as he did... Cause Doc turned out to be completely worthless for this project in any case, so it looks like Crowetic was right - btw I realise Crowetic is also a scammer and dodgy character but still maybe he had some fresh ideas how to run this thing right this time... And Doc was just being a d*ck for not letting other people take over the control... that dude is one hell of a b*tch  He wouldn't let other people run this project, and now he himself made a bunch of promises and bailed out of the camp in the middle of the night without saying a word... haha, and he still has full control, ownership and access to everything. With proper marketing maybe this project had a chance, cause Doc's super "Privacy coin" was never gonna happen anyway - Doc doesn't know anything about cyber and crypto technology, he can't innovate, he just copies others old stuff at best. I'd say Doc was an even bigger scammer than Crowetic. Doc himself uses some big marketing words like, "Cyber warfare expert" "Phd" but in reality he's completely worthless  Doc thought that Tor nodes was some kind of advanced technology these days that nobody ever heard of before  But the word on the street is that NSA have de-anonimized Tor network a year ago already, they can fully control the network if they want to - it's not going to get better in the future. "Cyber Warfare" expert my ass that Doc  For a split second I thought maybe he can deliver something, but that never really happened did it? That guy is full of sh*t. He truely sounds like he's "somebody else" lol... You know when you buy a used car from a - better check under the hood, you know... 
|
|
|
Well we have his mugshot:  Anybody seen this guy?
|
|
|
Some kind of trend with that guy Dr. Asif Masood Baloch PhD
First his love affair with the Spanish crypto scammers with whom he was involved in coin project and walked out on them
Second his love affair with another known crypto scammer Crowetic with whom he was involved in coin project and now this "PhD" likewise disappeared in very similar fashion... what's going on here with this 'Doc"? lol
Right on the money: "Asif Baloch has gone for a lack of professionalism and ethics” Well that's definitely true but on top of lack of ethics and professionalism with that guy, it's the lack of any technical expertise in crypto and cyber security matters that is the real problem. Just because he advertises himself as security and cyber warfare expert doesn't mean that he actually knows anything about it. The reason why he never delivered the super coin with privacy features because he doesn't know anything about it. All he did was copy the Blackcoin which is 3 years old.
|
|
|
|