Show Posts
|
Pages: [1]
|
I have updated the story on Medium with new replies from the DeepOnion devs and from Satowallet's CEO.
|
|
|
this palette name looks great but seeing your feedback as a user to understand there is some problem on using there valid and getting their customer service accordingly. They must think about their customers first and do the service as customers expected. You have any proof by showing they were doing scam attempt, you are always welcome to create your thread on scam accusation section.
For now I wouldn't say 100% that they are scamming, but many customers had their Onions there and they don't even try to put it back or refund the customers or just even reply to them.
|
|
|
So, if I send some coins to a wallet and then next day that coin get removed from the wallet without a warning, I should just accept that my coins are lost and I should argue with them about this?
And they not just a wallet, they are an exchange, too.
I wrote the email to them 2 weeks ago, they don't even care to respond.
And yes, it wrote to me I have to wait 3 minutes before I can post again, but that would have been my first post 🤔 when the 3 minutes were gone I tried to post again, it said I already posted it but it wasn't there.
From your testimony looks shady indeed.I'd give a generic advice with only using a popular exchange or popular wallet but it seems that you already lost your money maybe you can spread your problem to the internet so that you may catch their attention and to prevent people from being a victim there aswell. With these kind of exchanges usually they just don't care how many times you submit a ticket, the best is to ruin their reputation if they don't want to be responsible. That's the reason I came back to BTCTalk, I want people to know that they can't be trusted or somehow reach that they start working on their serious issues. Many customers had issues and they wrote it in their Telegram group. Do you know what their response was for this? They muted the group today...
|
|
|
By its name, I thought that this is a wallet but I'm wrong with that.
if this isnt a wallet then what is it for ? by its name we can read that it have a wallet , so im guessing that its also a wallet . They don't care about their customers. Not a bit. They just want our money.
thats what the wallet for . you need to put your money or cryptos on them and they dont forced you to that at the first place . you were the ones that placing your money on a wallet . the wallet name is satowallet , sounds like satoshi wallet . it also sound trusted to me . Why not try to visit out yourself ? rather than concluding this is a wallet. Its an exchange dude. https://satowallet.com/I dont know why people do really keep on finding these unknown exchangers trying out to make deposits and when they experience problem they do whine after. Why they cant just stick out on top ones rather than risking into these things? When I tried out it was just a wallet with a support for PoS coins, 2 weeks later it became an exchange. If KuCoin would have started it's soft staking earlier I would have never sent anything to Sato.
|
|
|
but for example when I tried to talk them about the situation in their Telegram group, they just simply banned me.
If you complain properly and not doing anything unnecessary, then that acts shows that they don't want to solve customer problem or in other words, shady af. I think you should find other wallet for your needs, there are a lot of atomic wallet that support quick exchange like Magnum for example. So, if I send some coins to a wallet and then next day that coin get removed from the wallet without a warning, I should just accept that my coins are lost and I should argue with them about this? And they not just a wallet, they are an exchange, too. it looks like others had similar issues with Deeponion coin where the website screwed up but then others seem to have their issue solved recently maybe you have to wait more! in any case, services like this are always bad by default. not to mention they are always a disaster waiting to happen. eventually they will reach a phase where they can not make enough profit, so they turn into Ponzi (if they aren't already with their 40% profit!) and then slowly start their exit scam. you should try not to get involved with these things in first place. I posted there, too, later, btctalk was buggy, had to try 3 times when finally posted
bitcointalk is not buggy, there was a clear error message when you tried posting there telling you that you had to wait 6 minutes to post and that is a rule for accounts like yours that have low rank. I wrote the email to them 2 weeks ago, they don't even care to respond. And yes, it wrote to me I have to wait 3 minutes before I can post again, but that would have been my first post 🤔 when the 3 minutes were gone I tried to post again, it said I already posted it but it wasn't there.
|
|
|
For some reason it didn't allowed me to post there, I have tried. I don't know if you have read my story on Medium, but for example when I tried to talk them about the situation in their Telegram group, they just simply banned me. I haven't read your article because I don't usually check medium articles by someone. How it can be that you can't post on their thread if it isn't locked. If the thread isn't lock, everyone is free to post and reply to their ann thread. I posted there, too, later, btctalk was buggy, had to try 3 times when finally posted
|
|
|
For some reason it didn't allowed me to post there, I have tried. I don't know if you have read my story on Medium, but for example when I tried to talk them about the situation in their Telegram group, they just simply banned me.
|
|
|
Hi! I would like to set up a mining pool for my Antminer D3's and my problem is when I want to compile the coin in Ubuntu terminal it says this: checkpoints.cpp: At global scope: checkpoints.cpp:46:5: warning: missing initializer for member ‘Checkpoints::CCheckpointData::nTimeLastCheckpoint’ [-Wmissing-field-initializers] }; ^ checkpoints.cpp:46:5: warning: missing initializer for member ‘Checkpoints::CCheckpointData::nTransactionsLastCheckpoint’ [-Wmissing-field-initializers] checkpoints.cpp:46:5: warning: missing initializer for member ‘Checkpoints::CCheckpointData::fTransactionsPerDay’ [-Wmissing-field-initializers] checkpoints.cpp:58:5: warning: missing initializer for member ‘Checkpoints::CCheckpointData::nTimeLastCheckpoint’ [-Wmissing-field-initializers] }; ^ checkpoints.cpp:58:5: warning: missing initializer for member ‘Checkpoints::CCheckpointData::nTransactionsLastCheckpoint’ [-Wmissing-field-initializers] checkpoints.cpp:58:5: warning: missing initializer for member ‘Checkpoints::CCheckpointData::fTransactionsPerDay’ [-Wmissing-field-initializers] makefile.unix:186: recipe for target 'obj/checkpoints.o' failed make: *** [obj/checkpoints.o] Error 1
|
|
|
Hi!
I've started to set up a MN, my problem is that I made everything like written on Github, but it doesn't synchronize with the blockchain and say 0 connections. Should I open another port or what?
Thank your for any help
|
|
|
Hi all!
Let me talk about myself first, I'm 21 and from Hungary. I will be moving to Austria next month as the salary in Hungary is way too low for living and I'll have a job in Austria with a better salary.
Loan Amount: 0.5 BTC Repayment Amount: 0.55 BTC Number of days: 70 days Collateral offered: everything I have, my 3 Antminer D3s, one Bitmain PSU, a Lenovo Y520 notebook, a Macbook Pro early 2011 Reason: for the moving to Austria, with that salary I'll get there I can assure that I can pay back in 2 months BTC Address: 35tM337LHuJSDxfcVx6TDxTk33BxKmjPoT (My Cex.io account's deposit address)
|
|
|
Hi all! I'm selling a program which creates a silent Monero or Aeon miner, you can give all the details for pool, wallet address, threads, etc. Works only with CPU. It will shows up in the Task Manager as you want (default is Windows Defender.exe). Feel free to ask if you have any questions! The price is 0.005 BTC LINK
|
|
|
I just downloaded the wallet for Windows, but it doesn't sync, not even started. I tried with the nodes given upper.
|
|
|
On Mercatox the wallet is working, for me it has already generated an address.
|
|
|
Hi guys! I have a problem with my antminer S3+, the thing is that just half of it works, one of the boards doesn't want to. In the miner's info it just shows: -------- -------- The PSU is soldered to the miner, and it worked, just for now it has stopped working. Please help me, guys. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Thank you, Totyamuri
|
|
|
|