Show Posts
|
Pages: [1]
|
So I understand that Dwolla deposits are disabled, but what about withdrawals? If I request a Dwolla withdrawal right now, will that be processed?
|
|
|
Yep, you were right - I was paid and it just took some time for it to show up. Thanks!
|
|
|
I've been mining NMC for the past few days, and I had something around a 1.40 BTC balance with Eligius (1KUvwJTZnb6cRSB6VpiWF9jEoMbLv6MeBD). That balance seems to have disappeared and it has not been paid - the stats no longer show anything for the address.
|
|
|
I'm running 2 6990s (both with the OC switch on the overclocked position, but no further OCing) on a single-core Sempron 140. With cgminer, one card gets the expected performance, but the other one is incredibly low (40-50Mhash per GPU). I'm using an intensity of 9 as suggested in the original post for 6990s.
This is the exit output:
GPU 0: [395.7 Mh/s] [Q:91 A:85 R:3 HW:0 E:93% U:5.55/m] GPU 1: [395.6 Mh/s] [Q:92 A:96 R:1 HW:0 E:104% U:6.20/m] GPU 2: [39.4 Mh/s] [Q:12 A:5 R:0 HW:0 E:42% U:3.13/m] GPU 3: [46.4 Mh/s] [Q:13 A:10 R:0 HW:0 E:83% U:5.95/m]
|
|
|
The early adopters deserve their fortune. They took on the risk back when Bitcoin was new and when its future wasn't clear. In this case, their investments (mining hardware and/or money, time) paid off, but it could've gone either way.
|
|
|
FYI you may want to properly disable registration. You can still register using the Google cached page.
|
|
|
Yep, I can confirm what everyone else is saying.
|
|
|
Yep, site + pool seems to be down.
|
|
|
580 gets 127-130 mhash/sec at stock clocks with rpcminer-cuda on default settings under Windows 7 x64 (only one card so no SLI issues). 5850 gets somewhere around 240 mhash/sec or possibly more with the latest miners (I'm going off the wiki on this).
|
|
|
a 5850 gets more mhash/s than a 580. There really isn't an nvidia equivalent.
|
|
|
I just started mining on this pool a day ago with a 6990.
I noticed this in the balance file for my wallet ID: {"earned":74171106,"paid":158675263,"balance":1425378}
I have indeed been paid $1.58. I'm not quite sure what the earned parameter means however. I thought it would be paid+balance, but it doesn't appear to be.
Also, when Bitcoin says it matures in X more blocks - does that mean it matures when ANYONE creates X more blocks or when the pool does?
Thanks!
eck
|
|
|
That seems really high, considering the 6990s are $730 new at Newegg.
|
|
|
why would that be? I've been using it and haven't had any issues, but if 10.10 is going to give me better performance or something, I'd rather go with that.
|
|
|
Also, why 10.10 and not 11.04?
|
|
|
I'm running Ubuntu Server 11.04 headless with a 6990. There's no need to auto-login or anything.
You do need to be running X and some kind of desktop environment or window manager, however. (I installed Xfce but something else should work too.) After that, just aticonfig and restart and install the APP SDK which should detect the GPUs.
|
|
|
Blocking an entire country won't do much... if the attack is larger than your uplink speed, you can block it with iptables or whatever all you want. It won't have any effect. ISPs that specifically offer DDoS protection have specialized (and very expensive) DDoS mitigation appliances that filter out the traffic before it even hits the box.
|
|
|
On Windows CUDA is included with the drivers... I don't have the CUDA toolkit installed and I can use rpcminer-cuda with no problems. Under Linux, the CUDA toolkit is indeed required.
|
|
|
Having some trouble compiling this on Ubuntu 11.04 x64: jwasm -DX64=1 -10 -elf64 -zcw -c -Fosha256sse.o sha256sse.asm JWasm v2.05, Mar 2 2011, Masm-compatible assembler. Portions Copyright (c) 1992-2002 Sybase, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Source code is available under the Sybase Open Watcom Public License.
sha256sse.asm(48) : Error A2091: Language type must be specified sha256sse.asm(314) : Error A2142: Unmatched block nesting: CalcSha256Sse sha256sse.asm: 316 lines, 1 passes, 0 ms, 0 warnings, 2 errors make: *** [sha256sse.o] Error 1 I checked the sha256sse.asm file and found that a language type was declared on x86, but not on x64. I removed the if statement, and did the same on the other ASM file, which allows it to compile but then I get "error 80004001" if I try to use it. Obviously the language type isn't declared on x64 for a reason, but I'm just not certain what it should be on x64 (since it obviously has to be something). This also happened with the latest version of JWASM - I'm using the older one since that's what most others here are using though. Thanks in advance!
|
|
|
|