Bitcoin Forum
May 28, 2024, 03:36:55 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1]
1  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: More crap to deal with - Dwolla Reverses TradeHill Transactions on: July 26, 2011, 12:41:47 AM
So I understand that Dwolla deposits are disabled, but what about withdrawals? If I request a Dwolla withdrawal right now, will that be processed?
2  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [480 GH/s] Eligius pool: ~0Fee SMPPS, no reg, RollNtime, SQL, hop OK, 8decimals on: July 23, 2011, 01:35:56 AM
Yep, you were right - I was paid and it just took some time for it to show up. Thanks!
3  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [480 GH/s] Eligius pool: ~0Fee SMPPS, no reg, RollNtime, SQL, hop OK, 8decimals on: July 22, 2011, 10:40:00 PM
I've been mining NMC for the past few days, and I had something around a 1.40 BTC balance with Eligius (1KUvwJTZnb6cRSB6VpiWF9jEoMbLv6MeBD). That balance seems to have disappeared and it has not been paid - the stats no longer show anything for the address.
4  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: Official CGMINER thread - CPU/GPU miner in C for linux/windows/osx on: July 19, 2011, 08:49:12 PM
I'm running 2 6990s (both with the OC switch on the overclocked position, but no further OCing) on a single-core Sempron 140. With cgminer, one card gets the expected performance, but the other one is incredibly low (40-50Mhash per GPU). I'm using an intensity of 9 as suggested in the original post for 6990s.

This is the exit output:

 GPU 0: [395.7 Mh/s] [Q:91  A:85  R:3  HW:0  E:93%  U:5.55/m]
 GPU 1: [395.6 Mh/s] [Q:92  A:96  R:1  HW:0  E:104%  U:6.20/m]
 GPU 2: [39.4 Mh/s] [Q:12  A:5  R:0  HW:0  E:42%  U:3.13/m]
 GPU 3: [46.4 Mh/s] [Q:13  A:10  R:0  HW:0  E:83%  U:5.95/m]
5  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: This should be kept secret! !!!!!!!!!!!! on: July 01, 2011, 12:03:57 AM
The early adopters deserve their fortune. They took on the risk back when Bitcoin was new and when its future wasn't clear. In this case, their investments (mining hardware and/or money, time) paid off, but it could've gone either way.
6  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [170Gh/s+] Bitcoins.lc - Finally a usuable Bitcoin Pool! (EU, IPv6, 0% fee, LP) on: June 12, 2011, 03:37:11 PM
FYI you may want to properly disable registration. Smiley You can still register using the Google cached page.
7  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: New CPU&GPU Miner [beta-testing] +30% effeciency on: June 03, 2011, 07:25:44 PM
Yep, I can confirm what everyone else is saying.
8  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [~540 Gh/s Mining Pool] INSTANT PAYOUT,+1% with LP! +0.8% for no failed blocks! on: May 12, 2011, 04:00:33 PM
Yep, site + pool seems to be down.
9  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: Official DiabloMiner GPU Miner Thread (now with Long Poll support) on: May 12, 2011, 03:58:05 PM
580 gets 127-130 mhash/sec at stock clocks with rpcminer-cuda on default settings under Windows 7 x64 (only one card so no SLI issues). 5850 gets somewhere around 240 mhash/sec or possibly more with the latest miners (I'm going off the wiki on this).
10  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: Official DiabloMiner GPU Miner Thread (now with Long Poll support) on: May 12, 2011, 02:02:20 PM
a 5850 gets more mhash/s than a 580. There really isn't an nvidia equivalent.
11  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: Please test: New Experimental Pool "Eligius" on: May 09, 2011, 07:43:08 PM
I just started mining on this pool a day ago with a 6990.

I noticed this in the balance file for my wallet ID:
{"earned":74171106,"paid":158675263,"balance":1425378}

I have indeed been paid $1.58. I'm not quite sure what the earned parameter means however. I thought it would be paid+balance, but it doesn't appear to be.

Also, when Bitcoin says it matures in X more blocks - does that mean it matures when ANYONE creates X more blocks or when the pool does?

Thanks!

eck
12  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: ATI Video Cards... Series 5 vs Series 6 on: May 09, 2011, 02:16:48 AM
That seems really high, considering the 6990s are $730 new at Newegg.
13  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Setting up an Ubuntu 10.10 miner - should I go 32 or 64 bit? on: May 07, 2011, 09:52:19 PM
why would that be? I've been using it and haven't had any issues, but if 10.10 is going to give me better performance or something, I'd rather go with that.
14  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Setting up an Ubuntu 10.10 miner - should I go 32 or 64 bit? on: May 07, 2011, 08:08:57 PM
Also, why 10.10 and not 11.04?
15  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Ubuntu Server mining with ATI? on: May 07, 2011, 05:22:19 AM
I'm running Ubuntu Server 11.04 headless with a 6990. There's no need to auto-login or anything.

You do need to be running X and some kind of desktop environment or window manager, however. (I installed Xfce but something else should work too.) After that, just aticonfig and restart and install the APP SDK which should detect the GPUs.
16  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: MTGox vs mysterious Russia on: May 03, 2011, 03:21:50 AM
Blocking an entire country won't do much... if the attack is larger than your uplink speed, you can block it with iptables or whatever all you want. It won't have any effect. ISPs that specifically offer DDoS protection have specialized (and very expensive) DDoS mitigation appliances that filter out the traffic before it even hits the box.
17  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Cuda Drivers? on: May 03, 2011, 01:46:16 AM
On Windows CUDA is included with the drivers... I don't have the CUDA toolkit installed and I can use rpcminer-cuda with no problems. Under Linux, the CUDA toolkit is indeed required.
18  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: Ufasoft Miner Thread - SSE2-optimized for Intel CPUs, version 0.8 (2011-April) on: May 01, 2011, 04:41:50 PM
Having some trouble compiling this on Ubuntu 11.04 x64:

Code:
jwasm -DX64=1 -10 -elf64 -zcw -c -Fosha256sse.o sha256sse.asm
JWasm v2.05, Mar  2 2011, Masm-compatible assembler.
Portions Copyright (c) 1992-2002 Sybase, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Source code is available under the Sybase Open Watcom Public License.

sha256sse.asm(48) : Error A2091: Language type must be specified
sha256sse.asm(314) : Error A2142: Unmatched block nesting: CalcSha256Sse
sha256sse.asm: 316 lines, 1 passes, 0 ms, 0 warnings, 2 errors
make: *** [sha256sse.o] Error 1

I checked the sha256sse.asm file and found that a language type was declared on x86, but not on x64. I removed the if statement, and did the same on the other ASM file, which allows it to compile but then I get "error 80004001" if I try to use it. Obviously the language type isn't declared on x64 for a reason, but I'm just not certain what it should be on x64 (since it obviously has to be something).

This also happened with the latest version of JWASM - I'm using the older one since that's what most others here are using though.

Thanks in advance!
Pages: [1]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!