Show Posts
|
Pages: [1]
|
Isn't Ethconnect the same Ponzi scam as Bitconnect?
|
|
|
Hubii seems to have it all, good token matrix, real product with real token usage, existing platform with millions of users, good team, good advisors and partners. It should get a lot of attention.
|
|
|
Really thank you to the guys of Enigma who let their accounts to be hacked. Fortunately I did not lost any money, but hackers obviously got our e-mail addresses, so now they can try to scam us many more times in the future. Does Enigma have control over their website now? Why there is no warning there? Or they cannot even recover access to their website? Another total ICO fail.
|
|
|
Decentraland ICO was a total fail, a few whales got evertyhing and the vast majority of the community could not get anything. Will be staying as away as possible from MANA, because whales can do anything with it. This shady pre-ico or what happened was a huge desillusion. This is not how you treat the community that is supposed to grow your ecosystem. Take an example from 0x, they gave everybody the same chance to get in.
|
|
|
Yes, please, it is the time to say something about the token price.
|
|
|
Not in this one. Because I cannot understand why a company that can spend 5 million dollars on buying the Invest.com domain and who knows how many million dollars on buying the broker Anyoption cannot spend a few bucks on the development of the Stox platform and Stox app (according to their road map there are not even alpha versions).
It's not about few bucks, and it's not only for developing the platform (marketing, legal, etc. need huge budgets). You can refer to STOX's whitepaper Each ICO should be about a product that can make the difference. So I expect every company to be focused on their product. But Stox is investing millions in other things, mainly marketing, for a project that has no product so far. They have spent last two years on marketing, I see no product. For me it is a warning sign. Had they spent a small percentage of their budget (let's say $100,000) on the product, they would already have something good to show. And now they have a fake counter on their webpage that says you have only a certain time to invest, but it is not true, the counter keeps getting higher. I saw it when it was at a few hours, now it say more than one day to the end. Another dishonest practice.
|
|
|
Not in this one. Because I cannot understand why a company that can spend 5 million dollars on buying the Invest.com domain and who knows how many million dollars on buying the broker Anyoption cannot spend a few bucks on the development of the Stox platform and Stox app (according to their road map there are not even alpha versions).
|
|
|
I'm in this one with a small investment. It is my first ICO Question for the guys from District0x: How likely is that there will be a contribution period v0.2 and maybe even v0.3 given the results of v0.1?
|
|
|
There are several threads about EOS.io, so I don't know if it was already mentioned, but when your read the EOS Token Purchase Agreement, it says: "The EOS Tokens do not have any rights, uses, purpose, attributes, functionalities or features, express or implied, including, without limitation, any uses, purpose, attributes, functionalities or features on the EOS Platform. Company does not guarantee and is not representing in any way to Buyer that the EOS Tokens have any rights, uses, purpose, attributes, functionalities or features."
Which means that when (if) the EOS platform goes live, it won't use EOS Tokens that are sold within the ICO, but EOS contracts, which are a different thing.
I almost invested in this one, but this finding made me stay away....
|
|
|
|