 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 »
|
100% real. Reach out to the team at support@crypterium.com regarding the issue. They will process your request as fast as possible. Speaking 1.5 month already. After a week they forget what we speak about. |
|
|
|
|
Is crypterium support team real or use chat bots?
Have a problem with receiving OTP password for online VISA payment.
First report was 1.5 month ago.
Support tell me - will be fixed in one week.
After week contact to support:
Nobody know about problem and ask me again "how we can help."
Gave them full information again..
Ok we will fix in one week..
and again and again.. every new request start from begining.
latest request IDs
163091
156629
ps;Create virtual visa card, charge 10eur, OTP not work, and I can`t close card and get money back, but crypterium got 2.99 fee. Very nice.
pps: Also banned in telegramm suport channel.
Good idea but bad realisation.
|
|
|
|
|
How to return money from locked unionpay card. Without writting letter to any third party company which I did no any deal. And I don`t want get any wire transfer to my bank account from some unclear company. Can you just back my money to my crypto account?
PS: Be careful with this company, you can easily lose money that you can`t get back. If you be persist, you will be blocked on official support channels. I have already lost money with this company twice.
|
|
|
|
|
Основной топик удален - очередной скам?
|
|
|
|
Thank you for your fast work... Problem with pools disappear, great.. but after 3-4 hours of work, number of rejects from pool grow... and now it about 30-40% ()ested on v1.2.11) Can it be related to thread management? PS: Do you plan add cpu miners ? (sorry if you already answered, didn`t read whole thread. ) |
|
|
|
The stability issue with yiimp-based pools and NeoScrypt is fixed, I think.
I will push a new release shortly.
Great, thank you.. will test as soon at release... |
|
|
|
version 1.2.10
Now the hashrate seems be stable after switching, but....no shares...So, after switching back to my pool there are no shares to it, while cards are mining well.
It must be your pool, then. Which coin are you mining at which pool? Confirm this problem on some pools, zpool and mine, in both tested Neoscrypt, after some time workers disappear at pools, but app still works and load GPU 100% |
|
|
|
Its great to see the limiting algorithm created by Joe in action and working to design, so few magi mined over the last couple of days - I'm sure these people with a lot of power will move on when they realise they are getting no reward.
Don`t count big hashers as stupid mans.. please  Easy script which calculated profitability for each interesting coin.. When magi not priftable script switch to other coins and back when magi reward grow. When you ask everyone down their hashrate - you ask them give you some money, but business not work in this way. As I told before - calculate magi block reward depends other cpu only coins profitability, and set it below 10%-20% it will be price which solo miners pay for remove "whales". |
|
|
|
This means I have a daily loss of about $0.00545139702
I guess current block value is temporary solution to test network after fork. Ofcourse with such reward nobody will mine this coin.. maybe some happy fans |
|
|
|
Jeremy450,
What I am wondering is why big minors keep on mining xmg. If they go for money, there are other coins that gain more money if they use huge miningpower.
They mine when coin profitable and switch to other when not. Nothing personal just money. There is not a lot cpu only coins. Guys who cry about big hashers: I don`t think you want help community - you just want have more money with your lower hp. But someone else always have more power than you and you hate them. PS: If you want create absolutely "fair" coin - stop mining and just give 1 coin for everyone by document ID , it will be fair. |
|
|
|
Many times passed and people still crying about big hashers ) If you want "wales" leave coin - just do it less profitable than other cpu based coins (neoscrypt, yescript etc).. Correct blockvalue always lower , then big hashers leave this coin and small one can get some reward. |
|
|
|
and now is easily over 100MH/s.
Much much more.. zpool about 70-80, nova 10, minerclaim 100.. and some big miners adds 10-30, so network rate come to 200-250 mh/s Don`t know why getmininginfo shows 50Mh/s |
|
|
|
The hash of the network is not that high ... from what the pool shows. He used to be like that. But the reward went straight down.
Although I understand the dependence of the hash network and the rewards that it is embedded in an algorithm
As a conclusion, I understand that what we see now is the consequences of the actions of strong miners?
Maybe joe tune up algo now? Anyway reward now become bigger, and big hashers are ready to get it... )) |
|
|
|
omg 0,55xmg x block  very very hard 3 days very hard because? same NET hashrate, same amount of miners Can someone explain me ... thanks There are people with huge hashrates increasing net hashrate resulting to lower mining amounts. What they get is 90% x 0.5 = Nothing! They don't understand (yet) that if they lower their hashrate by 95% they will get more... and the rest hashrate can be re-directed mining a different coin. Don`t do a mistake what people with big hashrate are stupid. Most of average hashrate users is solo or low, big hashers wait till they disconnect and made block value high, then jump to mining. |
|
|
|
http://m-core.org/issues.txt
I'd like to address some concerns raised in the past as well as recently. A short summary:
The coin targets at mining to be available to broad audience and general users. I was aware that there is no way to get done by few people, and would put the way in community and encourage participating in suggestions to make it better. Feel free to suggest.
I guess you should not "fight" against big hashers. Why? From chain point of view - every pool is single bighasher, solo and low rate workers must go to pools to earn at least something. If you beat big hasher - pool, you beat small players too. If you do random blocks or do very fast difficulty change, big hashers will just watch profitability on longer period time.. 1 - 4 - 8 hours... and see overall revenue, then compare with others. You should conccern only about coin stability and average values, do not try to please everyone. You can`t do it. 100 workers always do x100 more work. Solo miners can go to pool and get fair price depends their hr. PS: I`m one of big hasher (or mid hasher 5-20Mh/s) For now I do autoswitch when diff is low. |
|
|
|
This is one of few cryptonote coin left. If those guys with big mining farm come in now as we can see them doing recently, all the small miners are going to be sidestepped! How do we protect loyal CPU miners?
Good question. Thats very difficult. During this period Magi has a unique blockreward system what will drop the when huge miners join in. If the small miners wait for the big miners to leave the blockreward will go up. Only reason why huge miner would stay if they have free power so they have profit with low blockreward. Other huge miners don't get enough coins to give them profits. They will leave and mine other coins. Setup fast switch between coins automatically ,when block value grow - switch to magi, become low - go other coins. There is no real chance for small miners get a lot coins. Just deal with it. If someone have 1 device and other have 100, man who have 100 will get x100 time more profit. |
|
|
|
1.1 Mhs on the coin at thecryptopool.com and no blocks found yet  has 12 mh/s and no one block.. something really went wrong.. |
|
|
|
WTF is going on? I lost 500 XMG after wallet uprgade + resync  is your 500 old or mined in fork coople weeks ago? |
|
|
|
Hashrate NET 624 Kh/s Minerclaim 46,290.26 KH/s  I do not understand Maybe because difficulty near the zero? |
|
|
|
10:29:46: ERROR Magicoin Unable to sign block, wallet locked?
10:29:46: * REJECTED Sad Magicoin block 1481595 1 txs
2017-09-17 10:29:46: REJECTED XMG block 1481595 Is someone have such error? I have block decode err but sometimes I see "Unable to sign block" error. PS: Found problem, this err appear on pos blocks |
|
|
|
|
