Bitcoin Forum
August 01, 2024, 02:01:10 AM *
News: Help 1Dq create 15th anniversary forum artwork.
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 »
1  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: CannabisCoin [CANN][X11][Official] Developments & Discussions on: April 16, 2019, 12:08:03 PM
When Bittrex?
2  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][EXU][EXCHANGE🔥]✪ New revolution just started ✪[X11][POW][MN][LOW FEES🔥] on: March 04, 2019, 08:12:10 PM
Aaaaaaand... It’s gone! (SP emoji)
3  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Pools (Altcoins) / Re: The Blocks Factory - Multicoin pool on: February 28, 2019, 07:35:42 PM
This pool is fkn joke and a plain robbery I must say. I can't access my miners now that's why I'm forced to stay here for couple of days more, but here's the story. When I just joined the DGB output amount was something around predictions but with every day I was going down in payouts more and more. Last 24 hrs I mined 50% of my hashrate amount, how you like it. And the funny thing is that they have estimated amount per hashes on their mainpage and in the same time the real mined amount. Check the screenshot, very clear picture. And plus, now it shows zero hashes for my miners, but they are working, that I know. I'm a little bit angry at them, to say the least. And yes, I'm mining for quite a long time, so don't tell me about luck, pplns etc, I know that maybe better than you. Here's a pure case of cheating.

https://imgur.com/a/kAgAQ3A

4  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][EXU][EXCHANGE🔥]✪ New revolution just started ✪[X11][POW][MN][LOW FEES🔥] on: December 27, 2018, 10:31:36 AM
The wallet design is suspiciously similar to one scam coin FEX or FXC, don’t remember now, and they were building an exchange too. Never happened of course. The exact same colors and design. Strange coincidence.
1- I don't know what you're even talking about!

I'm talking about that coin: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2808637.0


And that wallet:


5  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][EXU][EXCHANGE🔥]✪ New revolution just started ✪[X11][POW][MN][LOW FEES🔥] on: December 26, 2018, 09:01:45 PM
The wallet design is suspiciously similar to one scam coin FEX or FXC, don’t remember now, and they were building an exchange too. Never happened of course. The exact same colors and design. Strange coincidence.
6  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: CryptoDredge ‎NVIDIA GPU Miner v0.1.0 (Windows) on: June 29, 2018, 10:20:19 AM
Someone already tested these algorithms with a GTX 1080 Ti? Huh

EVGA 1080ti SC, 76%PL, +90core, +125mem

lyra2z is giving 3.62MH
Lyra2r2 gives  73.7MH (minimal improvement from ~72.9MH in version 0.4.0)

My L2V2 stats are:
81.5 best - 78 average - 1080 Ti
65.40 best - 62 average - 1080
PL is 100%
7  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: CryptoDredge 0.5.1: ‎NVIDIA GPU Miner (Windows) on: June 29, 2018, 10:15:08 AM
Just wanted to say - wow, really. Great work. Couldn't beleive numbers on the screen, but the pool tells the same, so somehow you managed to win over any ccminer. Most impressive.
8  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] QRL - Announcing the Quantum Resistant Ledger on: June 28, 2018, 07:14:30 PM
how the hell to mine this stuff, I only have rejected shares from any pool, I'm really angry now
9  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: [ANN] MiningRigRentals.com - Web pool manager - Easy Mass Rentals - Algos! on: May 03, 2018, 08:26:22 AM
Can't login, site is slow AF. Is there any telegram or discord group for MRR?
10  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [$XVG] VERGE [POW][MultiAlgo][BLACKHOLE][Entire Line of TOR/i2P Resources] on: April 17, 2018, 02:15:00 PM
Hmm, how did they managed to break twitter?  Shocked
11  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.6 (Linux / Windows) on: February 20, 2018, 02:05:31 PM
How to apply overclock and fans speed thru dstm? Can't find commands anywhere in docs or in thread.
12  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.6 (Linux / Windows) on: February 19, 2018, 02:28:43 PM
Can someone please explain me one thing.
When I run DSTM or EWBF I have one card that starts ok but then goes down very fast to 1/2 hashrate.
NVIDIA Inspector shows very small (about 30-40%) usage of MCU on that card.
If I run ccminer (any algo) - all is fine, all cards are equal. So it seems to me that this is an equihash issue.
Please check card 1. Sometimes it shows shares like .. That card is totally equal with 7.8.9 GPUs, so it must give 750 h/s

Defective card?

2018-02-19 17:47:37|   ========== Sol/s: 7020.9 Sol/W: 2.65  Avg: 7058.2 I/s: 3777.9 Sh: 3.89   1.00 184
2018-02-19 17:47:42|   GPU0  53C  Sol/s: 700.6  Sol/W: 3.29  Avg: 698.9  I/s: 370.6  Sh: 0.18   1.00 172
2018-02-19 17:47:43|   GPU1  53C  Sol/s: 371.2  Sol/W: 1.96  Avg: 370.1  I/s: 199.0  Sh: 0.00   . .
2018-02-19 17:47:45|   GPU2  68C  Sol/s: 756.9  Sol/W: 2.57  Avg: 755.6  I/s: 405.2  Sh: 0.54   1.00 187 +
2018-02-19 17:47:47|   GPU3  64C  Sol/s: 735.8  Sol/W: 2.70  Avg: 742.6  I/s: 398.2  Sh: 0.18   1.00 188
2018-02-19 17:47:48|   GPU4  66C  Sol/s: 761.2  Sol/W: 2.71  Avg: 759.7  I/s: 405.8  Sh: 0.36   1.00 188 +
2018-02-19 17:47:50|   GPU5  61C  Sol/s: 754.7  Sol/W: 2.61  Avg: 760.5  I/s: 408.4  Sh: 0.73   1.00 187
2018-02-19 17:47:53|   GPU6  66C  Sol/s: 690.1  Sol/W: 2.83  Avg: 694.7  I/s: 372.7  Sh: 0.36   1.00 172
2018-02-19 17:47:54|   GPU7  56C  Sol/s: 758.7  Sol/W: 2.50  Avg: 761.1  I/s: 407.2  Sh: 0.18   1.00 187
2018-02-19 17:47:57|   GPU8  55C  Sol/s: 751.9  Sol/W: 2.76  Avg: 754.9  I/s: 404.9  Sh: 0.54   1.00 187
2018-02-19 17:47:59|   GPU9  62C  Sol/s: 769.0  Sol/W: 2.56  Avg: 759.6  I/s: 406.4  Sh: 0.91   1.00 188
2018-02-19 17:47:59|   ========== Sol/s: 7050.1 Sol/W: 2.65  Avg: 7057.6 I/s: 3778.4 Sh: 3.99   1.00 184
2018-02-19 17:48:04|   GPU0  53C  Sol/s: 693.4  Sol/W: 3.29  Avg: 698.6  I/s: 370.9  Sh: 0.17   1.00 172
2018-02-19 17:48:05|   GPU1  54C  Sol/s: 370.9  Sol/W: 1.96  Avg: 370.2  I/s: 199.0  Sh: 0.00   . .
2018-02-19 17:48:07|   GPU2  69C  Sol/s: 748.8  Sol/W: 2.56  Avg: 755.2  I/s: 405.2  Sh: 0.51   1.00 187
2018-02-19 17:48:09|   GPU3  65C  Sol/s: 742.9  Sol/W: 2.70  Avg: 742.6  I/s: 398.2  Sh: 0.17   1.00 188
2018-02-19 17:48:10|   GPU4  66C  Sol/s: 753.4  Sol/W: 2.71  Avg: 759.3  I/s: 405.8  Sh: 0.34   1.00 188
2018-02-19 17:48:13|>  GPU5  61C  Sol/s: 745.9  Sol/W: 2.60  Avg: 759.6  I/s: 408.4  Sh: 0.68   1.00 187
2018-02-19 17:48:15|>  GPU6  66C  Sol/s: 701.3  Sol/W: 2.83  Avg: 695.1  I/s: 373.0  Sh: 0.34   1.00 172
2018-02-19 17:48:16|>  GPU7  57C  Sol/s: 759.3  Sol/W: 2.50  Avg: 761.0  I/s: 406.9  Sh: 0.34   1.00 188 +
2018-02-19 17:48:19|>  GPU8  55C  Sol/s: 758.9  Sol/W: 2.76  Avg: 755.1  I/s: 404.9  Sh: 0.51   1.00 187
2018-02-19 17:48:21|>  GPU9  62C  Sol/s: 758.5  Sol/W: 2.56  Avg: 759.5  I/s: 406.1  Sh: 0.85   1.00 188
2018-02-19 17:48:21|   ========== Sol/s: 7033.5 Sol/W: 2.65  Avg: 7056.1 I/s: 3778.3 Sh: 3.92   1.00 184
13  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: LUXCoin—New PHI1612 PoW/PoS Hybrid—PrivateSend—LUXNodes—Live on Cryptopia on: February 06, 2018, 07:33:53 PM
Yes, it's fully synced. Everything looks fine.
The problem maybe is that - when I was sending I didn't added nodes yet. So it was fully synced but I had 0 connections to network (I noticed it after transaction).
So I sent LUX, then noticed that there are zero connections, closed it, added nodes, now I have connections to network but still 0 confirmations for transaction.

Is there a way I can rollback stucked transaction?

UPDATE - I have 1 confirmation. After one hour exactly. Not greatest speed I must say.
Thats why always make sure that u r fully synced with network before sending coins  Wink

Yeah, but there's another problem. 43 confirmations and nothing on Cryptopia yet. 2.5 hours since sending. Is this normal?
14  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: LUXCoin—New PHI1612 PoW/PoS Hybrid—PrivateSend—LUXNodes—Live on Cryptopia on: February 06, 2018, 06:02:26 PM
Yes, it's fully synced. Everything looks fine.
The problem maybe is that - when I was sending I didn't added nodes yet. So it was fully synced but I had 0 connections to network (I noticed it after transaction).
So I sent LUX, then noticed that there are zero connections, closed it, added nodes, now I have connections to network but still 0 confirmations for transaction.

Is there a way I can rollback stucked transaction?

UPDATE - I have 1 confirmation. After one hour exactly. Not greatest speed I must say.
15  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: LUXCoin—New PHI1612 PoW/PoS Hybrid—PrivateSend—LUXNodes—Live on Cryptopia on: February 06, 2018, 05:46:03 PM
Excuse me, but wtf is going on?
I've upgraded to newest wallet, added nodes, I have 6 active connections now.
Then I sent LUX from wallet to cryptopia. 40 minutes ago. Still I see:

Состояние: 0/unconfirmed
Дата: 06.02.2018 20:04
To: Cryptopia LQiXFG4249e74ExTSam2YsgEXpVh3FmWBf
Debit: -40.64000000 LUX
Transaction fee: -0.00077668 LUX
Net amount: -40.64077668 LUX
Transaction ID: 57018c1487126bd064c1ef885b06ecbd5a313c2cf83e54d9579b1b4a41e01002
Output index: 0

No confirmations, no LUX on wallet, no LUX on Cryptopia, nothing.
16  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][BWK] BULWARK | NO ICO | Masternodes | Accelerated PoW | Seesaw PoS/MN on: December 29, 2017, 10:08:29 AM
Whats happening with poolofd32th.club? It shows my hashrate totally wrong (in fact close to zero). Don't know yet about payments, must wait for couple of hours to check. Anyone can confirm?
17  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: 1080Ti Specific - Best mining option on: December 10, 2017, 10:09:27 AM
How this can help? I don't understand. In the end you will have the exact same driver from install package that you had before
18  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: 1080Ti Specific - Best mining option on: November 25, 2017, 08:17:07 PM
Wacko, you seem to be an experienced GPU miner so I want to ask you a question. You mentioned that it possible to destroy a card by running it with PL 120. I have free electricity so all my cards are cranked up to the maximum regarding the PL. they work at the cool environment, so the average temp is 65-70 with max overclocking.  Never exceed 80. They work for about half a year now without issues. So the question is - danger of max PL is in high temps only or that process himself (raising the PL) can somehow damage a card?
19  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: 1080Ti Specific - Best mining option on: November 24, 2017, 09:17:30 PM
I disagree about Zotac. I have MSI, ASUS, GBYTE, EVGA and ZOTAC. I like Zotac the most among them all. Rock solid build, quiet, fast. This is purely subjective I must say but still. I'm in love with Zotac.
And there's one good objective point. Zotac AE 1080 is the only card among my others that gives me totally stable 595 sols on equihash. For others 570 is an achievement, average 560.
I have only Zotac's 1080'Ti for the moment (EVGA and Asus on the way) so let's share information a little bit.
Zotac 1080 Ti AEC Edition gives me 765 sols on Equihash. What about your results?
20  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] STRAKS - Decentralised, Open Source, Community Driven Digital Currency on: November 23, 2017, 07:57:14 PM
To make long story short - not worth mining. Not now, not ever. Considering that SIGT swap - I have 12K Sigt, I will have 3K straks. There are people with hundreds thousands of Sigt in hands. If Straks will go 1$ - then maybe (just maybe) it will be somehow profitable to mine. But then Sigt holders will have their lambos at last (which won't happen). I'm out of mining straks, waste of hash and money. With hurrent situation I will have about 15 STRAKS per day from all my cards. I will be happy with my 3K from SIGT  Grin
Pages: [1] 2 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!