 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 »
|
Oops, this is me - only half paying attention when I signed in There isn't an internal IP address. The computers are directly on the ISP's domain (university) so the external IP is what the other computer's on the network see.
|
|
|
|
|
So I have been messing with this for weeks now and can't seem to make any sense of why this isn't working. It should be very straightforward... Can someone look over this for me?
Ultimately:
I want to run a small 330MH/s ASIC to solo mine BTC "lottery style" on one machine (win7) while bitcoind is running elsewhere on my network (linux) using port 4444. I would prefer to set my arguments via .conf files rather than .bat
I understand I have a VERY small chance of finding a block, that is the point.
I understand I am not using the traditional RPCport - it shouldn't matter as long as it is specified on both ends (besides, 8332 isn't working either).
I have tried calling the miner using a .bat with my arguments but that doesn't help.
I am running v0.10.0, I even re-downloaded the entire block-chain but to no avail.
1) I can connect to and mine on external pool using the exact same miner config file on the local machine. So i know the miner settings are generally good.
2) I can connect to my bitcoind server using bitcoin-cli and all my RPC arguments (user/pass/port/etc) on the local machine:
./bitcoin-cli -rpcconnect=127.0.0.1 -rpcport=4444 -rpcuser=xxxx -rpcpassword=xxxx getinfo
so it's not a problem with RPC.
3) I can even solo mine other coins (LTC using a sgminer, ZET using the ASIC/bfgminer) both locally and on the remote machine using 145.xxx.xxx.xxx:4444 on the windows machine using [almost] the exact same settings but not BTC for some reason.
When I try to point either miner at bitcoind though, I get "Pool 0 slow/down or URL or credentials invalid"
my .conf files are pretty standard:
bitcoin.conf:
server=1
rpcuser=xxxx
rpcpassword=xxxx
rpcallowip=145.xxx.xxx.0/24
rpcport=4444
daemon=1
listen=1
bfgminer.conf:
{
"url" : "145.xxx.xxx.xxx:4444", <also fails with 127.0.0.1:4444 on the local
"user" : "xxxx",
"pass" : "xxxx",
"generate-to" : "16z.......Bx8",
"scan-serial" : "all",
#miner settings
"api-mcast-port" : "4028",
"api-port" : "4028",
"expiry" : "120",
"expiry-lp" : "3600",
"failover-switch-delay" : "300",
"log" : "20",
"no-pool-disable" : true,
"no-client-reconnect" : true,
"no-show-processors" : true,
"no-show-procs" : true,
"no-unicode" : true,
"queue" : "1",
"quiet-work-updates" : true,
"quiet-work-update" : true,
"scan-time" : "60",
"skip-security-checks" : "0",
"submit-stale" : true,
"temp-hysteresis" : "3",
"shares" : 0
}
|
|
|
|
|
Are fresh contracts being sold yet or are they still only available in the trading thread? If so what is the current asking price / 100mH from LabRat?
EDIT: changed wording to contracts
|
|
|
|
Can someone generate a list of Dividends paid per share (old/new/whatever just specify) that have been paid since the over-payment in January?
DISCLAIMER: I suck at math. Date Dividend/Share25-Jan-2014 Overpayment day 01-Feb-2014 0.00040567 08-Feb-2014 0.00043432 15-Feb-2014 0.00043547 22-Feb-2014 0.00024280 01-Mar-2014 0.00036032 08-Mar-2014 0.00025698 Contract Split If Bonds hadn't split15-Mar-2014 0.00009648 0.00028944 22-Mar-2014 0.00008908 0.00026725 29-Mar-2014 0.00007614 0.00022843 05-Apr-2014 0.00007495 0.00022486 12-Apr-2014 0.00005861 0.00017583 19-Apr-2014 0.00005671 0.00017012 26-Apr-2014 0.00004973 0.00014920 03-May-2014 0.00004359 0.00013076 Accepted New Contract10-May-2014 0.00066619 0.00199856 (~15.28x increase over the week before) Awesome, thanks |
|
|
|
|
Can someone generate a list of Dividends paid per share (old/new/whatever just specify) that have been paid since the over-payment in January?
|
|
|
|
Since the thread is now calm, unlike last week, I'll bring this up again: I think that for first transfer Havelock->lmb-holdings there should be no fee.
I bought Neo shares on Havelock the first day of the IPO, and I don't see why I should pay an additional fee to have them on the official platform, which was not avaible back then. If the shares I bought on Havelock are "real", then why do I have to pay a fee for having them validated by lmb-holdings?
It would seem reasonble to me that the lmb->Havelock has a fee, since exporting your shares on a non-official platform with more liquidity is indeed a service TAT is offering, but not the other way around. Instead it's exactly the opposite! I would like to hear your (TAT's and Danny's) reasoning on this
I agree as well |
|
|
|
|
How are we coming along on this?
|
|
|
|
...
Please "balance sheet expert", lend us your brain for cloning!
Judging by how badly you guys have blown it with banking, i'd suggest you hold off on cloning brains. This is actually pretty funny  |
|
|
|
Please answer with a simple yes or no.
I'll answer you: read the prospectus. More carefully if you have allready. You could even read the first 10 or so pages of the thread and save us all reading over and over the same questions that cryptocyprus has allready answered I've read the prospectus, I know the answer, I just want an official real answer to a simple question, so I can make my point clear. Either they can prove me wrong or right, I just want the truth and to get that I want them to answer the question. If they will not engage in a simple debate to attempt to prove me wrong with simple facts, then that alone speaks volumes to me. Of course you cannot take possession of the bitcoin you numskull, at least not while your account is valued at your EUR deposit amount. otherwise you as the depositor would have access to 100% of the short term upside potential (withdraw the bitcoin) with none of the short term downside risk (leave the deposit in). If you want to abandon your EUR pegged position than buy a bitcoin and be done with it. |
|
|
|
I am working to deploy 100th of legal power against Labcoin by December 31st of this year.
To contribute to this effort and to get inside information about these legal proceedings please donate to: 1PK6Y6L8yPrR8v2Jo6fZxudG5fpEwiXitH
We are a legitimate legal force. We will be posting updates by the end of the day Tuesday - aka the end of the day tomorrow - aka 2 weeks - aka mid December. In the meanwhile you can see the 100TH of legal power come online on our website which will be updated to show the live legal rate. We will be adding legal power daily - it is just currently having some stability problems - or maybe we will just ask our uncle to represent us in 2 months. We encourage everyone to take advantage of cheap shares in this 100TH of legal power. Amazing Legal Team! |
|
|
|
Labcoin is still valued at a large premium for the mining sector: P/B = 7 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=263445.msg3428138#msg3428138If they can actually bring 100TH (at least 70TH) online within this difficulty, they will bring book value up and could hold their current share price, otherwise they may never catch up and we could move to 0.0000X territory. |
|
|
|
|
Current output of 1TH=1.29BTC/day
Output of 1TH/s in 10days = 10.29
Geometric sum of 70% of 10.29 for 35 "difficulties" = 42.5 BTC/TH/Year
Annual Daily output of 1MH/s = 0.000001290BTC
Edit: Annual = 0.0000426 BTC
Current value of LC = 0.0003
Hashrate required to repay 0.0003BTC in 1year = 7MH/s/share
10,000,000 shares of Labcoin.
Hashrate required currently for Labcoin to justify 0.0003BTC price with 1 year breakeven=
7MH*10,000,000 = 70TH/s
____________________________
10TH/sec/10,000,000 shares = 1MH/s/share
annual output of 1MH/s = 0.0000426 BTC
breakeven for 1MH/s to pay 0.0003 BTC = 7 Years
____________________________
These are given 100% Mining revenue -> DIVs
Actual payout is "70-80%" to DIVs
remaining 20-30% is retained to pay for hash upgrades
as such "future upgrades" should not be reflected in Book Value as they will be paid out from asset income.
|
|
|
|
We've finally deployed about 10 TH/s of stable hashing output. Here is the guest account for http://ghash.io, username : labcoin2 password : 12345 10,000,000Mh/s / 10,000,000 shares = 1Mh/s/share - If it's stable EDIT: (more math) 1GH/s = 0.00129 BTC/day at current diff 1MH/s= 0.00000129/day assuming diff adjustment of 30%/10days: 1year payout for 1MH/s = 0.000043 (Geom series of 70% n=35) Current Ask ~ 0.0004BTC Not making any recommendations 1 way or another but theres the math for anyone who want to use it. |
|
|
|
Important Notice (October 23th, 2013):
Please be advised that ActiveMining is implementing the following rules and procedures for Investors wanting to keep their shares:
Investors who fail for any reason to provide the information necessary to obtain "Verified" status on Bitfunder are encouraged to transfer their shares on BitFunder to the Bitfunder user AMC-TENDER no later than November 6, 2013 before dividends are paid. All Investors transferring their shares to this account will continue to accumulated dividends on their shares.
The October 30th dividends will be suspended and accumulated for payment on November 6, 2013.
Transfer Completed. I agree that a public list would be nice. |
|
|
|
Is the current payout for everyone? Is there a fee for this payout?
Everyone who was confirmed with me, you being one of them, received divs. 8 confirms already. NO FEES as I stated previously. Last payout was the only one... Thanks, nice to see we're leaving the BitFunder story slowly behind us  +1 |
|
|
|
Important Notice (October 23th, 2013):
Please be advised that ActiveMining is implementing the following rules and procedures for Investors wanting to keep their shares:
Investors who fail for any reason to provide the information necessary to obtain "Verified" status on Bitfunder are encouraged to transfer their shares on BitFunder to the Bitfunder user AMC-TENDER no later than November 6, 2013 before dividends are paid. All Investors transferring their shares to this account will continue to accumulated dividends on their shares.
The October 30th dividends will be suspended and accumulated for payment on November 6, 2013.
Are people doing this? I don't see a massive (>1M) holder on the asset list that would represent user AMC-TENDER. I assume this would cause the shares to be treated as direct - is there any estimate for how long they would be treated this way? |
|
|
|
The money is lost even if it is a ponzi scheme. Their silence speaks volumes. If it were anyone else running a legit operation they would be freaking out about these share prices. They'll let the price drop to 0 and not care when a corporation is supposed to legally profit for shareholders? It doesn't make sense.
You don't know what their scam is in the end. It could just as well be that they have working hardware, but want all the profit for themselves. So they create uncertainty with all their bullshit, suspiciously show very little hashing etc and drive the price down close to zero, then buy up all the shares. And then suddenly, when everyone has completely lost trust and they have 99+% of the shares, they suddenly do start to openly mine and can say "well, we told you all along, you just didn't have trust in us", thus saving themselves from the legal threats. The stock price would shoot up again dramatically and they would have earned millions in share appreciation already, let alone the mining income. I don't really think that is the scam they're doing, but it could just as well be. All that I'm practically sure of is that they are doing a scam, whatever the exact scheme might be. Just get out of this mess and buy yourself some safe and reliable ASICMINER. well...what you said is exactly the same as what I thought This is what I said last week I predict bad/non-news.
I think they have functional hardware and are working on getting it up and running. I think they don't care about share price staying up; in fact, i think they are trying to keep/bring it down with these terrible announcements. They almost comically contain no relevant content and always come out at the last possible second. The announcements are also very efficient at moving the price of the stock. I think LC believes in their company and is trying to acquire more of it "in-house" with these swings. That's why they haven't sold any shares but haven't locked them with Burnside as to maintain speculation and price swings. Not until more of the company is self acquired will we see real progress in these announcements, and they will have built a large company off a free loan in the form of their IPO.
I think holding for the long term will be rewarded but there could be some incredible downward swings in the meantime as stronger and stronger hands are shaken out by worse and worse news.
|
|
|
|
Where do I buy shares in team China?
Buy Bitfury rack and join Team China...  |
|
|
|
|
