 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
|
Several dotcoms and .orgs containing "coin".
Several dotcoms containing "crypto", for example for a marketplace, software or company name.
Even shorter related dotco domains.
.co.in domains correlating to cryptocurrencies.
PM me for details.
Escrowed for example through epik.com, private purchasing link payable in Bitcoins, or regular CC/Paypal.
|
|
|
|
|
following you on Twitter @cryptoreport
plz: GQgsNXo1Qd1dNVse976E2oQwphknkiK5ed
|
|
|
|
Thinking selling doge.co, mine domain, such short. Sniff such trend, for digging wow website!
Do not sell it for any less than $10,000 no matter how long you will have to hold. It will certainly sell at that price once DOGE appears in newspapers around the world in next few months. Yes, delicious sniffy $10k bone, offers taking. Or, shibe exhibition for gold medal bone on Flippa, weeeeh, wow, wow! |
|
|
|
|
Thinking selling doge.co, mine domain, such short. Sniff such trend, for digging wow website!
|
|
|
|
Done, but no succes. A 148 SXC transaction commanded 2.2 SXC fees, wallet to wallet. Maybe all the miners in the network have set their high arbitrary transaction fees.
My guess would be that your balance is made up of a large number of very small payments, probably pool payouts. If you combine many small payments into one big, this will produce a large transaction (kilobyte-wise). Large transactions require fees, no matter what you set paytxfee to, AFAIK. Interesting explanation: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=19066.msg253053#msg253053Right, my balance was composed from many p2pool payouts in single digit size. I managed to break down the balance into amounts that could be sent for free now. Successfully then sent the aggregated amount from the other wallet elswhere in one big transaction. |
|
|
|
I just had a look in my Sexcoin wallet version 4.8.4. In the Debug - Console when I write 'help' I can see in the list that there is a command: settxfee Could it be that in your wallet this command has been setup with a fee? Just a shot in the fog..  ..added later: oh I see - so when you receive SXC from another wallet (not another of your own wallets?) they have prob setup a fee in their wallet.. I use Sexcoin-0.6.4.1-win32-RC1 with Qt version 4.8.4 THe question is about transactions from one wallet to another wallet. settxfee 0 gives value true in the console, but the fees remain when trying. Add this line to sexcoin.conf: Restart the client and make a test transaction. Done, but no succes. A 148 SXC transaction commanded 2.2 SXC fees, wallet to wallet. Maybe all the miners in the network have set their high arbitrary transaction fees. |
|
|
|
I just had a look in my Sexcoin wallet version 4.8.4. In the Debug - Console when I write 'help' I can see in the list that there is a command: settxfee Could it be that in your wallet this command has been setup with a fee? Just a shot in the fog.. ..added later: oh I see - so when you receive SXC from another wallet (not another of your own wallets?) they have prob setup a fee in their wallet.. I use Sexcoin-0.6.4.1-win32-RC1 with Qt version 4.8.4 THe question is about transactions from one wallet to another wallet. settxfee 0 gives value true in the console, but the fees remain when trying. |
|
|
|
@icoins - not sure which transaction fee you refer to - but fyi most pool sites charge you a pool fee - typically 2%..
Some pools don't charge a fee..
My concern is the transaction fee from wallet to wallet. |
|
|
|
|
Regarding transaction fees. I'm not sure if I have a wrong client or malware infection. I wrote a 600 SXC transaction was costing 8 SXC. By trial and error I could send different smaller amounts for free, trying the amount a second time was commanded a transaction fee. A transaction of 99 SXC was costing 1.1, 98 SXC was costing 1.2 SXC. The fee was increasing with smaller amounts this time.
Is there a discussion on the transaction fees elsewhere?
Can somebody post a link where to download the correct SexcoinQT, for verification that I have the right client?
|
|
|
|
Is it normal that a 600 SXC transaction cost 8 SXC? Is there a table for transaction fees? I couldn't find the info where transacton fees are defined.
nope, not normal. Transaction from pool to wallet or from to wallet so somewhere else? Anyway, what I wonder about is this: is the name of the coin enough to link it to a certain business? What if Bitcoin or Litecoin or basicly any other coin out there, stabilises and starts getting used for lots of things, like online adult entertainment.. What efforts are being done right now to motivate online enterprises to use sexcoin as a currency? What does sexcoin have that other coins dont, which make SXC the best option when it comes to adult entertainment? I personally see a cryptocurrency being huge for online sex and porn. But why Sexcoin? I was wondering about the fee for wallet to wallet transactions. I just did a small transaction of 2 SXC succesfully without a fee. There might be a philosophy behind high fees for large transactions. I just want to know where can I get the info about how the fees are calculated, to not have to undergo trial-and-error. Besides being a good branding, being stimulating - not only for sales, indicating purpose - make your girlfriend/boyfriend/partner a present by sending some sexcoins ;-) - using sexcoins keeps transactions and their trails in the blockchain separated from other actions in civil life. Not at last keeping things out of the space where minors (of age) could be unadvertedly getting in touch with things they are not (yet) supposed to be. |
|
|
|
|
Is it normal that a 600 SXC transaction cost 8 SXC? Is there a table for transaction fees? I couldn't find the info where transacton fees are defined.
|
|
|
|
Let's all go to Antarctica and confront the Rothchilds and Rockefellers in their underground bases about what they have done. i was just thinking that maybe ww3 would be hugely bullish for bitcoin because it would allow for commerce between the subjects of different factions when the governments could probably restrict such commerce through the traditional banking channels.
I believe WW3 would be atomic war, and no computer infrastructure will be present because of nonexistent power plant supply. So very bad scenario for bitcoin |
|
|
|
just as that the internet and the electrical grid would be shut down, the financial system reset and subjugated to total surveillance, but probably not transparency, and the bankers will get it all - if we do not invent and digitally implement the new layers of a true productive constructive intelligent sharing and participating society. The bitcoin code also allows for transparency of transactions (preventing corruption) and documenting proof, see https://www.proofofexistence.com/about , and other features not to forget. Just how can I upload my dna and my consciousness into the blockchain if the earth is radioactively contaminated for 100 million years? I think it would increase Bitcoin's value, similar to how stocks go down, in war.
|
|
|
|
Another great source to get educated: Leuren Moret, Radiologist and Whistleblower: scroll down for a lot of interviews here: http://www.youtube.com/user/X888Quetzalcoatl888X/videosIn this context I suggest to read this piece about the banksters: "Sorcha Faal" from June 3rd: http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1684.htmincluding: "Press TV in their article “Banksters Attack Syria To Enslave America” also said: “Israel bombs Syria and threatens Iran. Russia moves its warships into the Mediterranean, and furnishes Syria with advanced anti-aircraft weapons. Hezbollah defends Syria against al-Qaeda. Pro-Israel US Senators like John McCain join forces with al-Qaeda. What is really going on here? Who is fighting whom, and why? Will Syria become the flash point for World War III? Is the West attacking the Islamic world in a “clash of civilizations”? Then why are the Israeli and American governments backing al-Qaeda in Syria? The old narratives no longer make sense. The real war isn't between nations, civilizations, or religions. The real war is the bankers' war to conquer the entire world. " [...] |
|
|
|
In this context I suggest to read this piece about the banksters: "Sorcha Faal" from June 3rd: http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1684.htmincluding: "Press TV in their article “Banksters Attack Syria To Enslave America” also said: “Israel bombs Syria and threatens Iran. Russia moves its warships into the Mediterranean, and furnishes Syria with advanced anti-aircraft weapons. Hezbollah defends Syria against al-Qaeda. Pro-Israel US Senators like John McCain join forces with al-Qaeda. What is really going on here? Who is fighting whom, and why? Will Syria become the flash point for World War III? Is the West attacking the Islamic world in a “clash of civilizations”? Then why are the Israeli and American governments backing al-Qaeda in Syria? The old narratives no longer make sense. The real war isn't between nations, civilizations, or religions. The real war is the bankers' war to conquer the entire world. " [...] |
|
|
|
|
How about drying up the money supply for the banks before anything worse happens. Deal in bitcoins and exclude the bank(st)ers! I suggest a social review system on top of bitcoin transactions. For example verification of bitcoin addresses you are dealing with. Follow the good trail of commerce! Military has to get paid, they won't go to war for nothing so they won't follow the bankers without them having the money (press) anymore. With all the money spent for the bankers and for the military we already could/would have paradise on earth. It's already there, but the satanists are preventing it. Sad. Ok we could question what was first, religious extremism or bankers. That's another problem to discuss and it seems there are not only materialistic problems to solve here on earth. I hope money can some day be a thing of the past, and before we could invent intermediary forms of money that inherently spread love and wealth amongst humanity. Be inventive!
|
|
|
|
|
Bankers expand monetary supply at their will, economy thrives, credit expands. Then they remove monetary supply, credits default, banks get it all. Then they usually get rid of "useless eaters" by war, and make money by supplying weapons and grabbing everything that has value in the longtime: gold, natural resources, farmland.
Now comes Bitcoin, banks won't get it all ;-)
|
|
|
|
|
