The adoption lifecycle applies to almost everything from Memes  to technology to business ideas even Bitcoin.

Looking at the injustice that is a result of our current money and economic system, it seems inevitable that a system like Bitcoin is an absolute necessity, and it is propagating according to the Law of Diffusion of Innovations.

My concern for Bitcoin to benefit the masses, (let's say 1/5th of the planet) 1,400,000,000 people; we need at least 15% early adopters to achieve the necessary momentum to trigger a tipping point. (That is about 210,000,000 enthusiasts to use and benefit from Bitcoin before it gets mass market appeal) that = BTC0.1 per person on average.

As the current distribution of Bitcoin stands at the moment Early Adopters were the ones who got in before the 2011 bubble and the new comers are looking like the Early to Late majority.   

The big question is why adopt Bitcoin if the majority of benefit (50% of easy money) has already been distributed?  That kind of limits new comers to Bitcoin to the Late Majority and Laggard status and limiting the total adoption to around 60,000 enthusiasts.

How do I sell the benefits of a fixed currency like Bitcoin when the wealth created by the labour of over a  100,000 people transfers to a single early adopter with a balance of a few thousand coins? 

Simon Sinek has a great TED talk on TED.com on "Why" , people adopt new technologies.

If you haven't read Crossing the Chasm by  Geoffrey Moore it is a good read.

If you do not have programming experience, it's better to start with the basics: to study the structure and algorithms of programming languages. As a basis to take the language of Java, to understand what object-oriented programming is and forward, in this area, intelligent developers are needed.

I'm a big fan of Java.  I started with Fortran on an IBM 1130, but I really like object-oriented program.  I prefer Java because it solves some of the problems with C++ and it has a rich set of libraries (both standard and third-party).  And, most of the time, you can run a program on multiple operating systems without having to generate system-dependent versions (and JNI is available for those situations where you need to directly access system functions).

You can look at my GitHub projects if you want some examples.

once you have successfully done that then you could get the private key and import or sweep it into the lighter wallet. You don't actually have to have the second wallet, but I think most people these days are going to use a lite wallet. Just make sure that you keep a couple copies of that data file so that if you have any trouble when you import one, even if it somehow gets corrupted, you have another copy.

I think what you're saying would work hard to tell exactly what your plan is. What I would do, is either on one computer or two set up two separate wallets. One be a software wallet that does not require you to download the blockchain. The other wallet is going to have to download the blockchain I don't think you're going to get around that. Once the full wallet has downloaded and in sync, did you can attempt to import the wallet.dat.

Bitcoin Core currently does not and never has used a seed (mnemonic). In 2013, Bitcoin Core did not support HD wallets either so all addresses were randomly generated. The only way to restore your wallet is to find a copy of your wallet file which has all of your private keys. Older copies may not have all of the private keys that you used.

What link?