 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
|
Just a heads up, OP is asking for $770 in advance for shipping. Not saying it's a scam, but buyer beware.
|
|
|
|
These units hash at different rates. That's important.
That's good to know! Do you know what percentage typically the fluctuation is? |
|
|
|
|
I have a friend looking to some M31S's. He's asking $7250 locally. If anyone is interested, I'd handle the online sale for him. Shipping would be included, and an escrow must be used, NO EXCEPTIONS (unless of course it was f2f)!! Buyer pays escrow fees. If interested, please post here or pm me.
Edit: I'm in the US
|
|
|
|
.027
Winner! Please pm me your shipping info. |
|
|
|
.075
Winner! Please pm me with shipping and escrow details. |
|
|
|
0.036BTC
Winner! Please pm me with shipping and escrow details. |
|
|
|
0.03
Please post pic with your username.
Will do, I'm not home right now, but will do it when I get back. |
|
|
|
EPIC and key validated!!!  The "g" on the public key for that print is commonly mistaken for a "q" when typed in and I can definitely see why. Will it be going to auction now that you have the complete set? Honestly, I'm not sure yet if I can sell it or not. It's the only collectible coin I only have 1 of. If you want to pm me an offer though, feel free, ya never know! |
|
|
|
Up for auction is a 2014 Ravenbit Node Number 37 of 50 Auction will start at 0.025 BTC and bid increments will be 0.001 BTCAuction will end Tursday August 29 at 9 pm Eastern Time. A reputable escrow will be used, no exceptions!! Buyer pays any fees. Since an escrow will be used, I will ship it USPS Express and split the costs with the winner. See pictures linked below, more available upon request: https://imgur.com/gallery/U18vIhttps://imgur.com/gallery/YIhTMhttps://imgur.com/gallery/l8hwkHappy bidding!  |
|
|
|
TTT |
|
|
|
|
Changed bid increment to 0.001BTC
|
|
|
|
You'd have much better luck if you started your own thread. Any potential buyer here will already know what this is. |
|
|
|
Good to know, I fund all my coins. This rationale shouldn't affect the premium however, just the demand for the coin.
It affects the premium for me and creates a much higher barrier to entry for the coin. It's fine to fund your own coins but when you fund (initially unfunded) and then try to sell them online it's a lot trickier especially when you expect the price to be increased by minimum X amount where X is the value of the funding. Unfortunately I can't find the certificate that came with the coin. I'm not really looking to sell right now, just curious of the possible value. If I were to sell, I could contact the maker and ask him if he possibly has a copy of the full address to prove that it's not a vanity address.
That's a bummer, I know some people are comfortable gambling on that amount but without 100% certainty that coin is funded with the stated value I will not be bidding. A good question at this point in time would be: How did you fund it without having the certificate? I'm guessing the funding took place when you initially got it before misplacing the COA? I'm the original purchaser of the coin, I funded it shortly after receiving it with mined Bitcoin (why I said they are virgin coin). The first 5 coins were graded by the creator before being sold. I must've had the certificate, but if not I would have funded using the first bits. I recently moved across the country so it's possible the certificate is still packed away somewhere. Seems strange that I wouldn't have kept it with the coin if I had it, but anything's possible. |
|
|
|
0.025BTC
Current high bidder! |
|
|
|
The funding will most likely make the premium worth less and the situation a little trickier. I'll be bidding if the price is right when it goes to auction. Why? Probably because it will exclude people who want to buy it unfunded and have less people interested in the piece because anyone can fund it once you have it but you cant unfund the piece once its on. And others like the piece as it was created. I think thats where digi was going with it. Pretty much what wheelz said and I'd like to add this point - you're hoping he didn't generate a vanity address with that prefix for which he controls the keys. Unless the COA/case are provided as well for which the address can be checked against, the public funding address can't be verified to be the exact one on that coin without manufacturer/maker verification. The risk is higher since the coin was initially unfunded by the maker and any responsibility for the funded value sits on the buyer in this case. Unfortunately I can't find the certificate that came with the coin. I'm not really looking to sell right now, just curious of the possible value. If I were to sell, I could contact the maker and ask him if he possibly has a copy of the full address to prove that it's not a vanity address. |
|
|
|
is that spot on the glit BTC on the capsule or the coin?
I will look closer at it after work and let you know. |
|
|
|
Up for auction is a 2014 Cryptolator Copper Number 023 Coin is not funded. Auction will start at 0.025 BTC and bid increments will be 0.001 BTCAuction will end Saturday August 26 at 9 pm Eastern Time. A reputable escrow will be used, no exceptions!! Buyer pays any fees. Since an escrow will be used, I will ship it USPS Express and split the costs with the winner. See pictures linked below, more available upon request: https://imgur.com/gallery/bClGD https://imgur.com/gallery/KwKbn https://imgur.com/gallery/Ora5NHappy bidding! |
|
|
|
|
