Show Posts
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 »
|
Hey Bitcointalk community,
I hope you're all doing well. I've been observing action on a particular altcoin Litcoin Cash (LCC), and I'm seeking insights from the community here on Bitcointalk. The altcoin in question is experiencing an interesting trend that has raised some concerns for me at least.
Firstly, the Global Index on the Hive has consistently been over 100 for several weeks now. This typically indicates a low probability of profit. Despite this, there seems to be a noticeable rise in effort in the Hive staking portion of the chain. It's a bit perplexing to observe what appears to be an implosion of sorts, yet the price is still showing a slow upward trajectory.
I'm curious if anyone within the community has any insights into what might be causing this peculiar situation with the Hive and the price action of this altcoin. Are there any specific developments, partnerships, or changes in the project that could shed light on this apparent contradiction? Additionally, I'm concerned about the lack of communication from the development team, as their social media channels appear to be inactive.
So, here are a few questions to spur discussion:
1. Does anyone have any background information on the development team behind this altcoin? 2. Have there been any recent announcements or updates regarding the project that might explain the observed trends? My quick GoogleFu didn't find much even on socials. 3. What are your thoughts on the current state of the Hive staking portion and its potential impact on the altcoin's future being a SHA256?
|
|
|
As an aside, CLAMspeech also provides an interesting opportunity for additional functionality on top of the protocol. Services such as Counterparty become much simpler to implement with a ready-made field in which could be placed data to be parsed and consensus approved.
This, this is what could make this coin.
|
|
|
I know this is kind of rheotorical, but I do try to leave accurate feedback and modify it if things change. I left the following negative feedback for blackarrow awhile ago. Have failed to deliver to most of their customers, delete any critical posts from a self-moderated thread, and refuse to deal with their issues. Blackarrrow recently left me negative feedback stating the following. blackarrow -12: -3 / +0(0) 2015-01-10 15.00000000 Accusations are false. We have honored our contract to all our customers. Would you the customers say blackarrow has honored their contracts with you? Price match with competitors at time of shipping: FAIL Compensation units: FAIL I'd say the contract is yet to be honoured. Clearly they have not. Miners also sold with 5 days free hosting. not provided. and as you say, price matching not honored. People asking about compensation many times. Very strange BlackArrow has time to post false trust but not type 2 sentences on compensation issue. Black Arrow is a lying piece of shit. Post false trust ratings for many people, claims they are paid by competition. He admits in online article that there is no proof of that. Probably does not like Mr. Teal trust because of trusted rating for Mr. Teal. Like small baby, he is mad if people post truth about him and his shit company, so he cries and then posts lies in their feedback. Maybe it is better, BlackArrow, to keep your word and your contract with your customers instead of crying like baby girl when someone says something mean to you. You have lied to everyone. Company has not honored agreements. All customers have lost most if not all money after all of your big talk. Now YOU post negative trust on these people. Maybe better to just shut your fucking mouth, asshole. They shipped my product. It came with issues with the software but a factory reset on the android OS fixed it. I'm up and hashing a 56ghz. Half of what they said it would.
|
|
|
My order was shipped and arrived today 1/30/2015 Original Order date 11/25/2013
Product arrived and boots to BA logo with background animation and hangs. Sometimes the Android alien with a [!] coming out of his belly shows up after a reboot.
Trying to submit a ticket to BA but their website is still struggling. Please PM if you can help.
|
|
|
Anyone have or see of this issue on the new touchscreen wifi version they are shipping now? Just noticed their website is down.
Does anyone have the firmware they could share?
|
|
|
I have a similar issue.
I just received my unit and with power on it hangs at blackarrow logo and wheel of death.
Their website is also down.
|
|
|
any luck getting it running?
|
|
|
Haters gonna hate... Better late than never. Hopefully.
|
|
|
Nov here. I was only able to buy 1 direct at the time so it looks like I might not get much compensation.
|
|
|
Hello, I am having some trouble could anyone tell what the issue is from the log?
It looks like I'm getting a kill message from the pool? I have tried a few different pools and get the same result.
alive pool [2014-05-10 21:12:14] Testing pool stratum+tcp://us1.ghash.io:3333 [2014-05-10 21:12:14] HTTP request failed: Protocol stratum+tcp not supported or disabled in libcurl [2014-05-10 21:12:14] Stratum authorisation success for pool 0 [2014-05-10 21:12:14] Pool 0 stratum+tcp://us1.ghash.io:3333 alive [2014-05-10 21:12:14] Network difficulty changed to 8G (57.27P) [2014-05-10 21:12:14] New block: ...11d03731 #300155 diff 8G (57.27P) [2014-05-10 21:12:14] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block [2014-05-10 21:12:15] BES 0: Opened /dev/cu.SLAB_USBtoUART13 [2014-05-10 21:12:15] BES 3: Opened /dev/cu.SLAB_USBtoUART5 [2014-05-10 21:12:15] BES 6: Opened /dev/cu.SLAB_USBtoUART8 [2014-05-10 21:12:15] BES 8: Opened /dev/cu.SLAB_USBtoUART6 [2014-05-10 21:12:15] BES 4: Opened /dev/cu.SLAB_USBtoUART [2014-05-10 21:12:15] BES 2: Opened /dev/cu.SLAB_USBtoUART12 [2014-05-10 21:12:15] BES 1: Opened /dev/cu.SLAB_USBtoUART11 [2014-05-10 21:12:15] BES 5: Opened /dev/cu.SLAB_USBtoUART10 [2014-05-10 21:12:15] BES 9: Opened /dev/cu.SLAB_USBtoUART9 [2014-05-10 21:12:15] BES 7: Opened /dev/cu.SLAB_USBtoUART7 [2014-05-10 21:12:15] API running in IP access mode on port 4028 [2014-05-10 21:12:16] New best share: 4 [2014-05-10 21:12:22] Received kill message [2014-05-10 21:12:22] BES 4 shutting down [2014-05-10 21:12:22] BES 0 shutting down [2014-05-10 21:12:22] BES 9 shutting down [2014-05-10 21:12:22] BES 3 shutting down [2014-05-10 21:12:22] BES 1 shutting down [2014-05-10 21:12:22] BES 2 shutting down [2014-05-10 21:12:22] BES 7 shutting down [2014-05-10 21:12:22] BES 6 shutting down [2014-05-10 21:12:22] BES 5 shutting down [2014-05-10 21:12:22] BES 8 shutting down [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Killing BES 0 [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Killing BES 1 [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Killing BES 2 [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Killing BES 3 [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Killing BES 4 [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Killing BES 5 [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Killing BES 6 [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Killing BES 7 [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Killing BES 8 [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Killing BES 9 [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Summary of runtime statistics:
[2014-05-10 21:12:23] Started at [2014-05-10 21:12:15] [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Pool: stratum+tcp://us1.ghash.io:3333 [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Runtime: 0 hrs : 0 mins : 8 secs [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Average hashrate: 0.0 Megahash/s [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Solved blocks: 0 [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Best share difficulty: 4 [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Share submissions: 0 [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Accepted shares: 0 [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Rejected shares: 0 + 0 stale (nan%) [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Accepted difficulty shares: 0 [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Rejected difficulty shares: 0 [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Hardware errors: 1 [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Network transfer: 2.2 / 0.4 kB ( 2.2 / 0.4 kB/s) [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Efficiency (accepted shares * difficulty / 2 KB): 0.00 [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Utility (accepted shares / min): 0.00/min
[2014-05-10 21:12:23] Unable to get work from server occasions: 0 [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Work items generated locally: 67 [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Submitting work remotely delay occasions: 0 [2014-05-10 21:12:23] New blocks detected on network: 1
[2014-05-10 21:12:23] Summary of per device statistics:
[2014-05-10 21:12:23] BES0 | 20s: 0.0 avg: 0.0 u: 0.0 h/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none [2014-05-10 21:12:23] BES1 | 20s: 0.0 avg: 0.0 u: 0.0 h/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none [2014-05-10 21:12:23] BES2 | 20s: 0.0 avg: 0.0 u: 0.0 h/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none [2014-05-10 21:12:23] BES3 | 20s: 0.0 avg: 0.0 u: 0.0 h/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none [2014-05-10 21:12:23] BES4 | 20s: 0.0 avg: 0.0 u: 0.0 h/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none [2014-05-10 21:12:23] BES5 | 20s: 0.00 avg: 0.00 u:536.6 Mh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:1/ 50% [2014-05-10 21:12:23] BES6 | 20s: 0.00 avg: 0.00 u: 1.61 Gh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none [2014-05-10 21:12:23] BES7 | 20s: 0.0 avg: 0.0 u: 0.0 h/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none [2014-05-10 21:12:23] BES8 | 20s: 0.00 avg: 0.00 u:536.5 Mh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none [2014-05-10 21:12:23] BES9 | 20s: 0.0 avg: 0.0 u: 0.0 h/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none [2014-05-10 21:12:23] [2014-05-10 21:12:14] Started bfgminer 3.99.0 [2014-05-10 21:12:14] Loaded configuration file /Users/jesseallmyer/Library/Application Support/MacMiner/bfgurls.conf [2014-05-10 21:12:14] Probing for an alive pool [2014-05-10 21:12:14] Pool 0 stratum+tcp://us1.ghash.io:3333 alive [2014-05-10 21:12:14] Network difficulty changed to 8G (57.27P) [2014-05-10 21:12:14] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block [2014-05-10 21:12:15] API running in IP access mode on port 4028 [2014-05-10 21:12:22] BES 4 shutting down [2014-05-10 21:12:22] BES 0 shutting down [2014-05-10 21:12:22] BES 9 shutting down [2014-05-10 21:12:22] BES 3 shutting down [2014-05-10 21:12:22] BES 1 shutting down [2014-05-10 21:12:22] BES 2 shutting down [2014-05-10 21:12:22] BES 7 shutting down [2014-05-10 21:12:22] BES 6 shutting down [2014-05-10 21:12:22] BES 5 shutting down [2014-05-10 21:12:22] BES 8 shutting down [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Killing BES 0 [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Killing BES 1 [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Killing BES 2 [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Killing BES 3 [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Killing BES 4 [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Killing BES 5 [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Killing BES 6 [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Killing BES 7 [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Killing BES 8 [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Killing BES 9 [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Summary of runtime statistics: [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Started at [2014-05-10 21:12:15] [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Pool: stratum+tcp://us1.ghash.io:3333 [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Runtime: 0 hrs : 0 mins : 8 secs [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Average hashrate: 0.0 Megahash/s [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Solved blocks: 0 [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Best share difficulty: 4 [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Share submissions: 0 [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Accepted shares: 0 [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Rejected shares: 0 + 0 stale (nan%) [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Accepted difficulty shares: 0 [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Rejected difficulty shares: 0 [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Hardware errors: 1 [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Network transfer: 2.2 / 0.4 kB ( 2.2 / 0.4 kB/s) [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Efficiency (accepted shares * difficulty / 2 KB): 0.00 [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Utility (accepted shares / min): 0.00/min [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Unable to get work from server occasions: 0 [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Work items generated locally: 67 [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Submitting work remotely delay occasions: 0 [2014-05-10 21:12:23] New blocks detected on network: 1 [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Summary of per device statistics: [2014-05-10 21:12:23] BES0 | 20s: 0.0 avg: 0.0 u: 0.0 h/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none [2014-05-10 21:12:23] BES1 | 20s: 0.0 avg: 0.0 u: 0.0 h/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none [2014-05-10 21:12:23] BES2 | 20s: 0.0 avg: 0.0 u: 0.0 h/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none [2014-05-10 21:12:23] BES3 | 20s: 0.0 avg: 0.0 u: 0.0 h/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none [2014-05-10 21:12:23] BES4 | 20s: 0.0 avg: 0.0 u: 0.0 h/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none [2014-05-10 21:12:23] BES5 | 20s: 0.00 avg: 0.00 u:536.6 Mh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:1/ 50% [2014-05-10 21:12:23] BES6 | 20s: 0.00 avg: 0.00 u: 1.61 Gh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none [2014-05-10 21:12:23] BES7 | 20s: 0.0 avg: 0.0 u: 0.0 h/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none [2014-05-10 21:12:23] BES8 | 20s: 0.00 avg: 0.00 u:536.5 Mh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none [2014-05-10 21:12:23] BES9 | 20s: 0.0 avg: 0.0 u: 0.0 h/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none [2014-05-10 21:12:23] Shutdown signal received.
|
|
|
Demand and what the people who want is are willing to pay.
|
|
|
Tell that to all the scammers / spammers.
|
|
|
Depending on the type of wallet you have you setup a receiving address on the mobile wallet, then use that address to withdraw to from the pool. There may be a minimum withdraw amount on the pool tho.
|
|
|
scamming people, so tired of shady websites.
|
|
|
My wife thinks it's a sham. That is until I bought her a 200$ Target Gyft card and said here have a shopping spree. That quieted her up for a while.
|
|
|
16zMKT9SxeDTGyKUVY6uc5AXNPu7sBdoZN
Let the train begin!
|
|
|
I sent support a message mid hack as the failed attempts were coming in. best they said to do was change my email and password. all attempts were different ip address so the probably had control of a botnet. That kind of makes sense but my password held up so maybe i shouldn't change it.
anyway there is no way to change my username, thats part one of what they need to hack in.
cex should be using a unique id instead of user names in their referral links imo.
|
|
|
Yeah, they finally stopped trying on mine also. Went on for about an hour. I honestly don't have any balance there anyway. It was super annoying seeing over 700 attempts but rewarding at the same time knowing my pw was strong enough.
|
|
|
|