 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
|
Hi All,
We've been made aware of a phishing scam within our defunct Slack channel.
Please ONLY send contributions to the Ethereum address on our website.
The scammer is also posting in the Golem slack. Please keep your wits about you folks.
Cheers
Sam
|
|
|
|
Are you guys serious? He hacked my account and is using it.
Why do you think he changed his username after I made that claim?
I am warning you all so you don't get scammed.
Stay Away
Hello Can you please provide a full explanation as to what you're talking about? I'm a little lost. Cheers Sam |
|
|
|
Response to a couple of questions on another thread: what-is-in-it Newbie * Activity: 14 View Profile Personal Message (Offline) Trust: 0: -0 / +0 Ignore Re: [ANN]Veredictum.io DECENTRALISED ANTI-PIRACY & CONTENT DISTRIBUTION PLATFORM August 22, 2017, 03:04:49 PM #4 This could be interesting.. I have a few questions though. According to your white paper, 70% of the subscription fee will be converted to Vertana for the use of their computational power on a monthly basis. (... • Members collectively use their unused computing power and bandwidth to search for digitally fingerprinted video based content - in the similar way SETI1 ...) Is this client specific ? Do you limit the number of "miners" who can support a client? OR is this based on the % computational power used irrespective of the number of users? The second aspect is related to searching & identifying content: Page 11 of the introductory white paper talks about how the client compensation of "miner/miners". Is this a non-subscription based approach? Reason being, the fee paid by the subscriber should ideally cover the cost of identifying the pirated copies (70%) Technically, digital watermarks can be erased - also this technology is constantly evolving . I understand that you are using an in-house solution - is this a patented steganographic solution? The fact that this is embedded this in the blockchain only helps the miners to identify it, but doesnt talk about the steganographic technology involved..which is critical. As far as i know, you also need device manufacturers to agree to use this. Just curious how that would play out. On another note, apart from the subscriber solution, is this different from Custotech? see here: https://custostech.com/Good luck!! 1. Is this client specific? - Not sure what you mean by this, but Veredictum is building the client. It is a web-based 'miner' that you can turn on by logging on to the Veredictum platform. It uses a C-based video transcoder that is compiled to a WASM target. 2. Do you limit the number of miners? - Yes we will. This is because there is only a limited number of URLs that we will want to inspect to detect watermarked material. More miners past a certain point puts us in diminishing returns territory, and reduces the rewards for all miners as they're split up equally. The 'miner' will scale up based on how much computing power you want to throw at it. Initially we may only support single machine mining (i.e. log in, set some parameters, press start), but we will also look at a dedicated miner. Note that the miner is does not work on a GPU, CPU cores only. 3. Miner compensation and subscription - Not sure what the question is here. Basically, the more fees we get from subscribers (people wanting to pay to search for their content), the more we can funnel through to the mining pool (to search more areas). In the first while however, we will need to be searching a significant enough section of the web in order to make the product useful, even though we might not have many customers (this is where the 'incentivisation pool' comes in to boost the funds sent through to the miners). 4. "Is this a patented steganographic solution? - Yes. The decoder will be embedded in the miner so that when files are pulled down, the miner can detect the watermark. It is possible for the watermark to be erased, however this is very very difficult. If someone can erase the watermark and restore the original video, tell them to email me for a job. 5. As far as i know, you also need device manufacturers to agree to use this. - Not so. Out of curiosity, where did you pick this up from? We have *some* hardware-enabled tech in the pipeline (relating to the distribution side of things) however the specific hardware we need is already in a great majority of devices globally, and is increasing over time. 6. is this different from Custotech? - Very different. Custostech have a manual process for claiming rewards. Our system is automatic and is based on even a small unit of effort. With Custos, you need to actually find a file with the information buried within. With us, you get rewarded regardless. Trust this helps. Let me know if any more questions. Cheers Sam Thanks for picking this up from the other thread. 1. Sorry, that didnt come out right - when I meant client - I was referring to a paying customer. 2.That clarifies. 3. What I meant to ask is whether a paying customer (subscriber) has the search & detect part included in the subscription (because 70% of subscription fees is pay out to miners). 4. I raised the erasing of watermarks based on : https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/01/pirates-defeating-watermarks-releasing-torrents-of-oscar-movie-screeners/http://www.mecs-press.org/ijmecs/ijmecs-v7-n12/IJMECS-V7-N12-5.pdf (page 38- 39 of the research paper highlights the limitations of different watermarking technologies) Audio watermarks in Videos/Cinavia: https://ps3yellowlightofdeaths.com/bypass-cinavia-protection-permanently-remove-blue-ray-protection/There is also an IEEE paper that lists some of the gaps. sending it when I find it The techniques involved, based on my limited understanding, will require content creators to adopt your patented solution.. 5. http://digitalwatermarkingalliance.org/journal-implementation-challenges-opportunities-forensic-watermarking/Please dont get me wrong, I think this is a great example of providing a solution with value based on the blockchain. I am just trying to find out if the USP is the subscription model (in which case, it can be copy-pasta) or if there is a robust stenographic technology backend that provides a differentiation. Thanks again for your answers! 1. "Client" - Ah, I see. No, miner's are not customer-specific. Miners are assigned at random to jobs in the search space. 2.That clarifies. - Great 3. Subscription fees Customers pay for the two different services differently: - watermarking and registration (one-off fee per video size/length) - search and detect (separate subscription) 4. Watermark erasure - Right. You are correct that it's technically possible to remove or destroy watermarks within a forensically marked piece of content. I should say that it's easier to destroy the watermark, but this also typically means reducing the quality of the content to a very low (unwatchable?) level. This line of reasoning falls into the margins of what we're trying to achieve, which is a general reduction in piracy, not total, complete elimination. Our goal is 80% reduction in 10 years. A sufficiently motivated and skilled individual may be able to remove our watermarks. If this starts to occur, we can improve our tooling, but ultimately that's missing the point. This is about providing this technology to everyone, not just big film studios. 5. ? - I'm a little lost on the last question, but yes, we have a steganographic back end which we provide to encode video with a watermark. This watermarked file is given back to the customer and the watermark is registered to a blockchain. Okay, fair enough, but how do you find where your content has gone? Phase 2 is the distributed search system that is described in the whitepaper. Okay, so I can find my content and prove that its mine so I can sue/issue-takedown/celebrate-because-it's-actually-supposed-to-be-a-viral-marketing-video, but I just don't want to get pirated in the first place! Phase 3 (will be done in parallel with full funding) tackles this by using an on-the-fly decryption mechanism. Again, there is a way to defeat this too, but it would be a video camera recording, or it would take a very, very motivated individual to rip the video and audio streams and post the (watermarked) content on the open web. But, if this happens, we know exactly where it has come from. 6. Thanks for your answers! - No worries. Thanks for your questions  Cheers Sam |
|
|
|
Seems like a cool idea - I'm looking forward to reading the token paper. Do you have an ETA for when you'll be releasing it?
may i join slack or telegram ,I'd be curious to chat with you guys/other interested people...
Whitepaper and Telegram information is available on https://tokensale.veredictum.io/Please note that, due to the various phishing attacks recently in Slack, we have disabled our public Slack. You can still interact with us on Telegram. Cheers Sam |
|
|
|
Are you guys really established since 2015?
Do you know that internet cant be ridden apart from Piracy as you can't seperate Porn and Internet. Dont you think that this project is doing something like Golem( they want similar insane stuff in Computation) and you want in Media.
Golem is a utter failure, Token is losing value and support.
How do you protect investors that they don't lose value of tokens? What are your priorities over exchanges , the token supply is too much, how can you cap the limit so that it is not inflated.
1. Are you guys really established since 2015? - Yes 2. Do you know that internet cant be ridden apart from Piracy as you can't seperate Porn and Internet. - You seem to know a lot about Pron. 3. Golem - Golem is a quality project who have been around a long time and we support them fully. Our projects are similar in terms of distributed computation, however our approaches and target markets are very different, but I hope we can work together in the future on the mutually beneficial (open-source) components. 4. Tokens, etc - We have a cap on the number of tokens that will ever be produced (300M). Details of how this number is split up and how they are released over time are on our website (e.g. 100M of these are a special pool that will be periodically burnt if not used for miner incentivisation - again, details on website). Please note that our project is not an investment; it's a crowd sale for future computational services that will directed toward searching for and distributing registered content with an anti-piracy goal (eliminating the drivers of piracy being lack of deterrents and lack of access to content). Cheers Sam |
|
|
|
Funds and tokens are held under a multisig contract. There are currently 3 signatories, however we will be extending this to 5 by the end of the crowdsale per our Key Management Plan.
We feel that this is, in fact, a stronger security regime than a single-point-of-failure in an escrow arrangement.
For security reasons, we're not releasing the identities of the signatories at this time.
So when the question has already raised about the escrow , and you say that you want to keep the signatories name anonymous, so how can we believe that all 3 or 5 members are none other that TIm only? or you only? See here everyday a new ICO comes and we are being ripped badly we cant invest until we are given a clear answer. Do you guys are ready to show your face on live hangout session? or want to remain behind the curtain. IMP: You must solve the escrow problem. I understand your concern. If you head to our website, our identities are very well known. We actually have many videos and have done a number of interviews that are available online. I can also tell you that Tim is not one of the signatories. Cheers Sam |
|
|
|
So it's like LBRY but you want the money up front (an ICO), and have ZERO actual product or proof of concept Why the hell would i give you money for this over keeping my money and using LBRY for this problem for free? Totally nuts haha Oh well, have fun, i see you have no escrow either, wonderful  Not a penny from me! Gday to you sirs!  Is it really like LBRY?? I mean they are initiating a good project but if they are not using the escrow then i am out of this project, i wish they answer the questions here. regards, Lee G'day Lee, Regarding escrow: Funds and tokens are held under a multisig contract. There are currently 3 signatories, however we will be extending this to 5 by the end of the crowdsale per our Key Management Plan. We feel that this is, in fact, a stronger security regime than a single-point-of-failure in an escrow arrangement. For security reasons, we're not releasing the identities of the signatories at this time. Regarding LBRY: The distribution component of our technology offering is similar to LBRY in that it also has a custom peer to peer file protocol. Our protocol is optimised for video and is coupled with an on-the-fly secure key decryption regime to help prevent content leakage. Further details of this will be released when we can. Cheers Sam |
|
|
|
this project is simply not even thinkable! they want to stop the propagation of films over the internet? be reasonable people this can never happen! the internet itself was invented to do just that for the porn industry! so they could transfer porn fast and easy without being traced! so now why and how could these few foolhearted humans try to stop the foundation of what they are using?
i suppose next they will turn off the deepweb or the darknet!
and i am sure they can stop the sky from falling also!
In terms of our technology offering, we will have the ability to: (1) detect registered content on the open web and provide this information back to the content owners; and (2) prevent content leakage in the first place using a novel distribution system. I always advocate reading through the related documentation fully before getting too excited. Cheers Sam |
|
|
|
The "dev" here is using a hacked account, no one invest in this ICO its a scam.
Not exactly sure what you mean by this, but I assume you're referring to the number of posts I've made? I signed up specifically to answer a question someone had on another thread (reposted in this thread for convenience). Thanks for your interest. Cheers Sam |
|
|
|
Response to a couple of questions on another thread: what-is-in-it Newbie * Activity: 14 View Profile Personal Message (Offline) Trust: 0: -0 / +0 Ignore Re: [ANN]Veredictum.io DECENTRALISED ANTI-PIRACY & CONTENT DISTRIBUTION PLATFORM August 22, 2017, 03:04:49 PM #4 This could be interesting.. I have a few questions though. According to your white paper, 70% of the subscription fee will be converted to Vertana for the use of their computational power on a monthly basis. (... • Members collectively use their unused computing power and bandwidth to search for digitally fingerprinted video based content - in the similar way SETI1 ...) Is this client specific ? Do you limit the number of "miners" who can support a client? OR is this based on the % computational power used irrespective of the number of users? The second aspect is related to searching & identifying content: Page 11 of the introductory white paper talks about how the client compensation of "miner/miners". Is this a non-subscription based approach? Reason being, the fee paid by the subscriber should ideally cover the cost of identifying the pirated copies (70%) Technically, digital watermarks can be erased - also this technology is constantly evolving . I understand that you are using an in-house solution - is this a patented steganographic solution? The fact that this is embedded this in the blockchain only helps the miners to identify it, but doesnt talk about the steganographic technology involved..which is critical. As far as i know, you also need device manufacturers to agree to use this. Just curious how that would play out. On another note, apart from the subscriber solution, is this different from Custotech? see here: https://custostech.com/Good luck!! 1. Is this client specific? - Not sure what you mean by this, but Veredictum is building the client. It is a web-based 'miner' that you can turn on by logging on to the Veredictum platform. It uses a C-based video transcoder that is compiled to a WASM target. 2. Do you limit the number of miners? - Yes we will. This is because there is only a limited number of URLs that we will want to inspect to detect watermarked material. More miners past a certain point puts us in diminishing returns territory, and reduces the rewards for all miners as they're split up equally. The 'miner' will scale up based on how much computing power you want to throw at it. Initially we may only support single machine mining (i.e. log in, set some parameters, press start), but we will also look at a dedicated miner. Note that the miner is does not work on a GPU, CPU cores only. 3. Miner compensation and subscription - Not sure what the question is here. Basically, the more fees we get from subscribers (people wanting to pay to search for their content), the more we can funnel through to the mining pool (to search more areas). In the first while however, we will need to be searching a significant enough section of the web in order to make the product useful, even though we might not have many customers (this is where the 'incentivisation pool' comes in to boost the funds sent through to the miners). 4. "Is this a patented steganographic solution? - Yes. The decoder will be embedded in the miner so that when files are pulled down, the miner can detect the watermark. It is possible for the watermark to be erased, however this is very very difficult. If someone can erase the watermark and restore the original video, tell them to email me for a job. 5. As far as i know, you also need device manufacturers to agree to use this. - Not so. Out of curiosity, where did you pick this up from? We have *some* hardware-enabled tech in the pipeline (relating to the distribution side of things) however the specific hardware we need is already in a great majority of devices globally, and is increasing over time. 6. is this different from Custotech? - Very different. Custostech have a manual process for claiming rewards. Our system is automatic and is based on even a small unit of effort. With Custos, you need to actually find a file with the information buried within. With us, you get rewarded regardless. Trust this helps. Let me know if any more questions. Cheers Sam |
|
|
|
|
