The following is an updated attempt to assess and evaluate:

  1.   Enhancements/Protocols:
  
    a. Anonymous Capabilities / Anonymity
    b. Privacy
    c) Security

  2.   The coins that currently implement these features


Every will be made to assume none of these coins are a complete solution (yet).  Not because they're bad, but because a lot of the other comparison threads out there have been polarized toward one coin as the "solution with all the best end to end features".  

I would really appreciate your thoughts and input on this work in progress, so that together, we can make it even more complicated and unreadable.




Anonymous, Privacy, and Security features are clearly all related to one another, yet in my mind are distinct:
  
Anonymous features ultimately aim for the holding and transacting of a commodity which both requires and releases zero identifying information.
              Buy a pizza.  No receipt, no exchange of information, no record of the pizza or you.
                    There are obvious legal implications to this, causing it to be a "dark" feature.
                          However, this slander assumes that the governing body itself is not "dark", or corrupt.   In many places in the world, Anonymity is a matter of life and death.
                          As such, Anonymity is a double edged sword, aiding both sinister and altruistic efforts.
                          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anonymous_(group)
              

Privacy features aim to give ownership of identifying information to individuals/entities who hold or transact a commodity.
              Buy a pizza, there's a record of it but that record is for you (and potentially the pizza shop) only.
                    There is a legal arguement for privacy features.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privacy_law

Security:  If you can hack the thing, you need not worry about Anonymity and Privacy.  Those are out.



Some other attempts at this:  

Full list of anonymous coins
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1025878.0

 [DASH/XDN/XMR/SDC] Comparison between the most known anonymous coins
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=985039.0

Privacy getting important: Verge or Spectrecoin or DeepOnion??
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2397519.0;all

Which cryptocurrency is most anonymous?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2157374.0


https://zcoin.io/zcoins-privacy-tec


Wondering about this one:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2525344.0

It could be about the IRS, Federal Reserve, Scotland Yard, MI6 and the FBI searching, investigating and going around the world, trying to track down Satoshi. They come across Craig Wright and other imposters. They find a Satoshi Nakamoto in California and demand that he confesses. It turns out that this is the wrong Satoshi. There are car chases, only to catch criminals mistaken for Satoshi.

We walk into the NSA data center with a group of programmers. In front of big screens with scrolling code, they talk about new algorithms that they developed for their new quantum computer, which will try to geo-locate Satoshi's public addresses. One programmer says: "This is the most hash power ever executed by a supercomputer any where in the world" Behind them, we see a huge room with multiple rows of computers. We can hear a loud hum from the heat fans. Another programmer walks over to the wall and turns the air conditioning to maximum. A superior says: "We got congress to give us $2 billion to catch him. If his doesn't work, you're all going back to writing iOS apps for kids."

At the end of the movie, the investigators are standing around a hotel lobby, tired, frustrated and sharing notes. The superiors are yelling obscenities at the incompetent subordinates. Behind them, we see a man with sunglasses, seated and sipping on cognac. He is surrounded by beautiful women. It looks like a scene out of a Dos Equis commercial of the “world’s most interesting man.” He gets up nonchalantly, walks to the front of the hotel, where a bellhop drives up in a Lamborghini, gets out and hands the keys to the man.

So close, yet so far.

The man turns his head, looks back at the investigators and smirks. He gets in the Lambo and starts the engine. The camera zooms in on the keychain, which has a name tag with the initials “SN”. He drives away with a loud roar.

Fade to black.

I don't know if this is possible

Even if you could carry out this type of analysis, I don't think you would get any coherent results since, to me, it is pretty meaningless anyway. How come? Simply because when people sell and buy at exchanges, they don't typically withdraw the proceeds. They just sit idly and wait for the price to rise (fall) in order to sell (buy) again, then rinse, repeat (and reap profits). And this happens many times until the trader decides to withdraw, so there is no way there could be a meaningful correlation between prices rising (falling) and the number of transactions made to and from exchanges. Hope this helps