Bitcoin Forum
June 21, 2024, 06:59:30 AM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 »
1  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: PicoStocks, bitcoin stock exchange on: July 16, 2017, 11:03:04 AM
Wiesz, że Propharma wchodzi na Nasdaq? Smiley Dwie spółki z "notowanych" na Pico są zarejestrowane w KRS i tam można nieco ciekawych rzeczy się dowiedzieć.

Z drugiej zaś strony niezależnie od miejsca zarejestrowania Pico (tak a propos to jest błąd w adresie biura. Przypadek?) jego założyciele i udziałowcy są obywatelami polskimi i za ewentualne przekręty będą odpowiadać przed polskimi sądami. Biorąc pod uwagę wzrost kursu BTC tym samym waga ewentualnych przekrętów znacznie rośnie i na ich miejscu jednak postarałbym się załatwić pewne sprawy w białych rękawiczkach, jeżeli mają zamiar wyprowadzić majątek z Pico i zwinąć biznes.
2  Economy / Securities / Re: [PicoStocks] 100TH/s bitcoin mine [100th] on: February 24, 2015, 03:54:28 PM
http://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-miner-aquifer-files-for-chapter-11-bankruptcy/
3  Economy / Securities / Re: [PicoStocks] 100TH/s bitcoin mine [100th] on: February 07, 2015, 08:16:15 PM
one of the elements of my contract with the law firm is not commenting on this forum;)
4  Economy / Securities / Re: [PicoStocks] 100TH/s bitcoin mine [100th] on: January 21, 2015, 08:20:25 AM
I stay with my opinion.
5  Economy / Securities / Re: [PicoStocks] 100TH/s bitcoin mine [100th] on: January 21, 2015, 06:47:49 AM
For insult a corresponding fee will be added.
6  Economy / Securities / Re: [PicoStocks] 100TH/s bitcoin mine [100th] on: January 21, 2015, 03:32:24 AM
Not only for me.

Have agreed to share in compensation.

http://www.kplu.org/post/central-wash-home-nations-biggest-bitcoin-mine-more-coming

"I consider it absolutely high-risk investment," he said. "And like high-risk investment should be, it has been high reward. I'm talking about tens of millions of dollars of return on a few million dollars of investment."
7  Economy / Securities / Re: [PicoStocks] 100TH/s bitcoin mine [100th] on: January 20, 2015, 07:11:07 AM
You obviously do not understand the meaning of the word "fact"Wink

And what are the facts?

That's why in this case was the issue Cointerra on Picostocks?
As if you did not try to explain it any "version" does not explain the issue, as it perfectly explains the acquisition 28nm technology. For the 100th shareholders' money.
This is confirmed by Leszek entry in this topic in which he writes that looks ready 28nm technology in order to acquire it.
Is my investment decision was bad? I bought shares when it was not yet announced the delay and mine was to be launched in July 2013.
Global hashrate then was 223.746 GH / s, which is an additional 100,000 GH / s constitute 44% of the Global Hashrate. Mining with Global Hashrate 518.000 was finally launched on 15 December 2013. At that time the Global Hashrate was already 6,502,229 GH / s, of which 44% after deduction would be 2,633,060 Hashrate 100th GH / s. And that should be the finally power of the 100th, does not have any 518.000 GH / s.
Most plunges Picostocks management and sale of shares of MBP 0.30 BTC at the time when they knew that they would delay the project (insiding trader) and sale of equipment designed initially for 100th in the market, which resulted in delays


And more...
8  Economy / Securities / Re: [PicoStocks] 100TH/s bitcoin mine [100th] on: January 20, 2015, 02:46:06 AM
You see you do not have any arguments. Such texts do not win in court.
You're trying to just scare.
I wonder whether the same will be brave in the courtroom.
Wednesday less and less time..
9  Economy / Securities / Re: [PicoStocks] 100TH/s bitcoin mine [100th] on: January 19, 2015, 07:03:14 PM
Really you can not think of anything more intelligent?
I did not say anything here about technical issues only deceiving investors.
Deliberate deceiving. And for that Dave can not only pay but sent to prison. He deserves this as well and for Tom.

No investors were deceived.

Dave only hosted 100TH and he did a good job of it; he didn't have anything else to do with the project.

Stop blaming other people for BTC's rise in difficulty and drop in price.

I know you won't listen to this, so go ahead and make a fool of yourself.  Give the lawyers all you money and see what happens.

Don't worry, I will be here to remind you of this warning.   Wink

Want to bet on whether Dave or Tom are "sent to prison?"

No, you don't?  OK, I didn't think so.   Grin

+1 to icebreaker on this issue. The 100TH mine has operated and acted very reasonably since conception, and is part of the short list of IPO projects that actually achieved their goals (about 80% of IPOs failed within the first 3-6 months). The amount of fuss you are raising over a 500TH mine is simply absurd, now that hashrate is FAR FAR cheaper and more efficient than when the 100TH+400TH of the mine was put into action.

seriously, the 500TH of bitfury 55nm at 1w/gh is worth about $80,000-100,000 right now at street value. as a bulk value, its probably worth about $50,000. Thats something like 1% of its initial value over a year ago, and I can guarentee you any lawyering-up that you do will probably cost $10,000+

Is reading comprehension that hard?
Dave is the most co-responsible for the delay 100th, his company sold equipment produced for the mine. I have enough evidence to convince the court.

On Wednesday I spoke to the lawyers.
10  Economy / Securities / Re: [PicoStocks] 100TH/s bitcoin mine [100th] on: January 19, 2015, 06:58:09 PM
Really you can not think of anything more intelligent?
I did not say anything here about technical issues only deceiving investors.
Deliberate deceiving. And for that Dave can not only pay but sent to prison. He deserves this as well and for Tom.

No investors were deceived.

Dave only hosted 100TH and he did a good job of it; he didn't have anything else to do with the project.

Stop blaming other people for BTC's rise in difficulty and drop in price.

I know you won't listen to this, so go ahead and make a fool of yourself.  Give the lawyers all you money and see what happens.

Don't worry, I will be here to remind you of this warning.   Wink

Want to bet on whether Dave or Tom are "sent to prison?"

No, you don't?  OK, I didn't think so.   Grin

Leszek passed about a year ago 100TH for Dave.
11  Economy / Securities / Re: [PicoStocks] 100TH/s bitcoin mine [100th] on: January 19, 2015, 07:19:19 AM
Really you can not think of anything more intelligent?
I did not say anything here about technical issues only deceiving investors.
Deliberate deceiving. And for that Dave can not only pay but sent to prison. He deserves this as well and for Tom.
12  Economy / Securities / Re: [PicoStocks] 100TH/s bitcoin mine [100th] on: January 19, 2015, 06:56:57 AM
That's what happened in this meddling? I have at the moment a few law offices who want to deal with this matter. I think it will be the best solution because it can not reach an agreement with you. Count yourself whether the cost of the process does not amount to more than any I get on with victims.
13  Economy / Securities / Re: [PicoStocks] 100TH/s bitcoin mine [100th] on: January 19, 2015, 06:38:30 AM
Leszek passed about a year ago 100TH for Dave.
What one can see here:

https://megabigpower.com/accountstats

14  Economy / Securities / Re: [PicoStocks] 100TH/s bitcoin mine [100th] on: January 19, 2015, 06:26:12 AM
Because they failed to recognize the failure of the connection to acts of some persons.
These people came to the conclusion that the more they earn by building its own mine.
But why it is we have to bear the costs of the deliberate delay?

P.S. want to participate to a lawsuit?
15  Economy / Securities / Re: [PicoStocks] 100TH/s bitcoin mine [100th] on: January 19, 2015, 04:49:38 AM
Simple questions:
-Why, then, was the issue of Cointerra?
-Why sold equipment designed originally for the 100th causing even greater delay?
-Why private mine was built at the same time claiming that it is unprofitable business?

Such questions are quite a few more. Do you really want to get to the granting of the answers took the court?
16  Economy / Securities / Re: [PicoStocks] 100TH/s bitcoin mine [100th] on: January 18, 2015, 04:19:33 PM
Any public offering is an obligation to shareholders. That is according to US law. So the training before you write something here.
17  Economy / Securities / Re: [PicoStocks] 100TH/s bitcoin mine [100th] on: January 18, 2015, 08:19:32 AM
I have a close family lawyer;)
The case is thoroughly discussed.
Most plunges Picostocks management and sale of shares of MBP 0.30 BTC at the time when they knew that they would delay the project (insiding trader) and sale of equipment designed initially for 100th in the market, which resulted in delays.
Cousin assesses the probability of winning the case at 80-90%, taking into account that this whole business is worth several million volunteers to lead this matter will not miss.
I do not know what is your relationship with MBP and Pico Icebreaker but this only proves that discouraging that I'm right. You do not have any arguments, and in addition is the last pair of high-profile trials of those associated with the BTC.
I would suggest the expansion of the 100th or redemption of shares at a reasonable exchange rate, at least for the price of 100th issue and withdrawal from the market.
18  Economy / Securities / Re: [PicoStocks] 100TH/s bitcoin mine [100th] on: January 17, 2015, 05:54:34 PM
That's why in this case was the issue Cointerra on Picostocks?
As if you did not try to explain it any "version" does not explain the issue, as it perfectly explains the acquisition 28nm technology. For the 100th shareholders' money.
This is confirmed by Leszek entry in this topic in which he writes that looks ready 28nm technology in order to acquire it.
Is my investment decision was bad? I bought shares when it was not yet announced the delay and mine was to be launched in July 2013.
Global hashrate then was 223.746 GH / s, which is an additional 100,000 GH / s constitute 44% of the Global Hashrate. Mining with Global Hashrate 518.000 was finally launched on 15 December 2013. At that time the Global Hashrate was already 6,502,229 GH / s, of which 44% after deduction would be 2,633,060 Hashrate 100th GH / s. And that should be the finally power of the 100th, does not have any 518.000 GH / s.
As you can see my loss was not the result of my wrong decision and your conscious intentions in order to trick the minority shareholders.
After consulting with a lawyer I am sure that every court will award to me and the rest of the persons bringing a class action lawsuit right. Thought to ourselves that this is not possible in any other way to solve.
19  Economy / Securities / Re: [PicoStocks] 100TH/s bitcoin mine [100th] on: January 17, 2015, 11:28:22 AM
The fact is that the shareholders 100th scammed. First, delay, and then build on the basis of the obtained through measures the shareholders his own the mine. 500 Th from Leszek is not just any gift clumsy attempt to close the project and hence his own incompetence.
You can not miss things Cointerra. Through the subscription of shares it is Cointerra MBP came into possession of the latest 28nm technology, which currently uses for its own purposes.
As you can see the links between Picostocks and MBP exist. Given the circumstances, it can be called a criminal ties.
Cues have a legal opinion. Do you really want to explanation of what happened came to the court? In the context of what is happening lately chances of winning the case you have very little.
20  Economy / Securities / Re: [PicoStocks] 100TH/s bitcoin mine [100th] on: January 17, 2015, 04:44:34 AM
Really? Wink Do not you know what the MBP website is it? Wink

https://megabigpower.com/aboutus (www last changed in July '14)

"In 2012 MegaBigPower began production of the BitFury 55nm ASIC mining chip. In 2014 we are producing cutting edge 28nm ASIC chips based on our own design. Our plan is to push the bitcoin mining network to an unprecedented rate of growth."

Today is 2015.

Parameters of MBP 28 chip: (https://megabigpower.com/faq (www last changed in July '14))

"Our next generation of mining gear is nearly completed. It will run at .5 watts / GH, or .5 MW / PH. We run 3x 30A 208v circuits in a 2' x 4' rack, which is about 15 KW. If any of that makes sense to you, please get in touch!"

Parameters of Cointerra 28nm chip:

https://cointerra.com/chip-technology-behind-bitcoin-phenomenon/

"The 28nm Asic is capable of processing 500Gigahash/s Bitcoin transactions and with power efficiency being the other important parameter, teh chip has a specfied power consumption of 0.5W/Gh/s."

Facts or conspiracy theory?
I wonder what he would say about all this lawyer. Smiley
 
Pages: [1] 2 3 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!