|
I got my delivery of a D3 it arrived from China to the EU in 17 days...
It came with good instructions will be buying more here at this shop the checkout accepted some altcoins I had been saving up for a while.
|
|
|
|
|
Still demolishing those hashes. come on block..
"hashrate1m": "518T",
"hashrate5m": "424T",
|
|
|
|
Boosting the chance for a little while! "hashrate1m": "1.15P", "hashrate5m": "1.06P", "hashrate1hr": "389T", Come On Luckkk..  |
|
|
|
Earlier today the DIFF on the /pool status page was over 103 its now back at 95.8? Did something happen?
Bitcoin difficulty rose. Dammmmm.. 21.39% The Diff has been rising at a crazy rate since 4th June. Look at the jumps before jumps in the prior 5 months to this in the 2nd table. From July to Now Oct 26 2017 1,452,839,779,146 21.39% 10,399,832,230 GH/s Oct 15 2017 1,196,792,694,099 6.49% 8,566,975,802 GH/s Oct 02 2017 1,123,863,285,133 1.85% 8,044,926,758 GH/s Sep 18 2017 1,103,400,932,964 19.58% 7,898,451,536 GH/s Sep 06 2017 922,724,699,726 3.89% 6,605,120,681 GH/s Aug 24 2017 888,171,856,257 -3.80% 6,357,781,793 GH/s Aug 09 2017 923,233,068,449 7.32% 6,608,759,726 GH/s Jul 27 2017 860,221,984,436 6.92% 6,157,708,817 GH/s Jul 14 2017 804,525,194,568 13.53% 5,759,015,666 GH/s Jul 02 2017 708,659,466,230 -0.43% 5,072,782,052 GH/s Jun 17 2017 711,697,198,174 4.85% 5,094,526,985 GH/s Jun 04 2017 678,760,110,083 13.90% 4,858,754,124 GH/s We only see one time where we have double-figure jump in this period was back in January at 16.54% now look at the jumps above if the difficulty is adjusting up for the additional hash rate why is it now jumping at higher s% than previous even though the hash rate change is still equivalent and yet we are seeing hash rate jump on and off bitcoin on almost a switch. Previous data May 23 2017 595,921,917,085 6.42% 4,265,775,241 GH/s May 10 2017 559,970,892,891 7.28% 4,008,427,786 GH/s Apr 27 2017 521,974,519,554 0.22% 3,736,439,151 GH/s Apr 13 2017 520,808,749,422 4.24% 3,728,094,244 GH/s Mar 30 2017 499,635,929,817 5.03% 3,576,533,297 GH/s Mar 17 2017 475,705,205,062 3.24% 3,405,230,497 GH/s Mar 03 2017 460,769,358,091 4.54% 3,298,315,540 GH/s Feb 18 2017 440,779,902,287 4.41% 3,155,225,442 GH/s Feb 04 2017 422,170,566,884 7.43% 3,022,014,630 GH/s Jan 22 2017 392,963,262,344 16.64% 2,812,940,600 GH/s Jan 10 2017 336,899,932,796 6.05% 2,411,623,656 GH/s Could the Diff be manipulated in some way to make it spike like this if you look at some charts of the Diff we are moving up at such a rate now it's incredible to look at. |
|
|
|
|
Earlier today the DIFF on the /pool status page was over 103 its now back at 95.8? Did something happen?
|
|
|
|
Omg>>> 749936269042.0653,
That was so close!!
Damm ailikun! nice hit. Come on block someones got to hit one sooner rather than later. |
|
|
|
We're all munching those numbers in the hope of hitting that willy wonka's golden nonce to the crypto factory!  Come on solo pool crack us another winner! edit..  "hashrate15m": "8.06P" pools got some new power I think! |
|
|
|
|
Unless you fancy buying a new laptop when it burns out then its not going to be a worthwhile exercise.
Your better off downloading core or something on your laptop and having a play with that or get yourself some GPU's and a motherboard and mine some altcoins but bitcoin is no longer viable to mine on CPU. It CAN be done but it would be a futile exercise and be a waste of your machine.
Look into miners like avalon or s9 miners if you're looking to get into mining they are the only real viable options for profit but you need to take into account a few things before going down the asic route.
1. Power cost! You need to know what your electricity will cost before you start this is key to your ROI if your electricity is costing more than you can mine then it's not a good idea.
2. Heat... These suckers pump out a lot of heat and require good ventilation for optimal performance, many people overlook this factor when buying and setting up.
3. Difficulty... The network is taking some rather epic jumps recently and there is much new hashrate coming online every day so you need to factor in the increase in this as this will affect your return.
Hope this helps.
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I'd like to join with 2.8 TH
Yea sure I can add you to the list could you send us some proof of hashrate before I add you to the list just so I can verify you have hashrate available saves trying to arrange and confirm everything when the project starts. just a simple screen shot will do. Thanks and welcome aboard miner! |
|
|
|
Hey Atrax, here you go. I hope we can start soon!  Fantastic gagoobree. I hope we can push forward soon only a few places left until we reach the 100th mark. I will be pushing this out there this week to try fill up the places as I have had a busy week so far. To all those waiting to start can we try get some more talk in the topic guys to spread the word try fill the last few places. Then it's Block Hunting Timeeeeee.. |
|
|
|
I am still sure there is something fishy going on with the difficulty and certain pools being attacked at the moment all be it none of them can put their finger on the cause and it's being put down to "Luck" While we all know luck can be a bitch of a factor in mining just look at the block distribution some pool hammering block after block in succession is not something that can put down to just "Luck" There was a possibility of miners doing something nefarious on pools to bring their luck right down but for the life of me, I can't seem to find the article about it now. If it turns out that some of the larger pools are doing something that can damage other pools chances of finding a block then we as a community need to find the solution to the problem because right now all this in-fighting between dev's all this forking carry on really is going to end in a serious disaster some point we need to put a stop to this somehow and get back to the core values of what bitcoin was all about in the first place not being bent each way to suit different parties. I do fear that in time we will see more mega hashrate from China burst onto the network pushing the smaller miners out by even more. You just need to watch this to understand why things need to change sooner rather than later. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6kibPzbrIc |
|
|
|
Just watched a vid on Youtube posted yesterday by Rover Ver. He said that it cost him $59 to send Bitcoin. Jesus Christ, that's bloody ridiculous! Those miners are incredibly greedy and will send Bitcoin to the ground if that's the case. Who the hell is going to use Bitcoin for everyday transactions when it costs you $59 to buy a pack of chewing gum? Imagine going to buy a cup of coffee and you need to wait a few hours before the retailer can confirm your payment went through before they let you out of the shop.
Well 59 Dollars is 1% of todays value of Bitcoin. You were ignoring Bitcoin in the first place that is why you are complaining about the fees. If you were here from the very start you will never ever say that the fees are ridiculous. Only newbies will say that. Cover is blown. The everyday transaction example is also about ignorance. If it is POS. Bitcoin transaction is faster than your credit card transaction. You don't need to write your signature everytime you use your Bitcoin. With credit card a lot of paper work will be dealt with. Hidden charges will be dealt with. Reconciling balances will be dealt with. But with Bitcoin there is a public ledger. Nothing is ever hidden. Banks hide everything. It does still matter even you are an early adopter or late adopter/recently joined up the group.$59 fees will really hurt for sure even if you are a whale or does hold up lots of bitcoin.My current situation on making transfers do charge me up almost $3 basing on the average fees recommended as of these days which i do consider to be high still. I always just have a quick look over at block trail shows in the table the optimal fee and shows the lowest fee and highest fee paid can be helpful |
|
|
|
Tempted to dust off my old S1's with the pencil mod... what do you reckon or have they had their day?
I'm still churning along with x6 s3's one died a horrible death! I only have 4 S1s and i replaced them with S3s a while back... not convinced it was the best move if i'm honest lol... the S1s i'm sure were cheaper to run per Ghash! all running off a 1200w PSU How'd the S3 die? Not 100% sure heavy plastic burning smell and some smoke from the inside plugs on top are fine no burning so I guess its been something on the board that's burned out need to pull it open and have a look see. I have x6 running from a total of 2500W X1 Corsair RM1000x x1 Corsair RM850 x1 XFX 650 |
|
|
|
Tempted to dust off my old S1's with the pencil mod... what do you reckon or have they had their day?
I'm still churning along with x6 s3's one died a horrible death! |
|
|
|
My god how is it that this pool only has 1.8Ph...
What a shame...
People are so short sighted...
Shame people just don't seem to understand the name of this game is PROPORTIONALITY...and this pool by far offers the highest rewards/hash rate.
All the fancy stats and pool sites are completely unneeded...The core stats are here and refresh every minute.
It also has great connectivity. and ZERO FEE for christs sake...
Variance on small pools can be a bitch ...but bad luck is bad luck period...And even big pools get hit bad..like Kano's recent 875% block.
The pathetically small payouts on big pools are deceptive and cumulatively more expensive..less cost efficient...
The only real problem is the constantly changing Diff..they keep moving the goal posts..this sure as shit hurts small pools big time...
CK is such a legend...They just don't get any better than this pool...
Where the hell is everyone?
WAKE UP PEOPLE! Get onboard this gravy train.
Don't forget the amazing solo pool! |
|
|
|
I'm trying to understand the best share and how it relates to luck. What qualifies as a good best share?
A "best share" is nothing more than the largest share your miners have contributed. It doesn't have any actual correlation to anything (other than "bragging rights"). A "good" best share is relative to hashrate and time. At the current difficulty, a truly good best share is one that's greater than 1,196,792,694,098. It's as CG says here, it is only for bragging rights, but if you wish to know what a good best share is then the following explanation will help you understand better. After 100 shares, on average your best share should be 100. After 1,000,000 shares, on average your best share should be 1,000,000. After 1,200,000,000,000 shares, on average your best share should be that too, meaning you should have found one block with it. That's why on average it takes current diff number of shares to find one block. If your best share is less than the total number of shares you've contributed, then your luck is a little low, and vice versa. It has absolutely zero bearing on your chance of finding an ultra lucky best share in the very next share, but it's interesting to watch nonetheless. So by the figures here that share would be classed as good luck? due to the lower amount of shares submitted through a higher best share = better luck? "shares": 81025757, "bestshare": 14310183700.74831, |
|
|
|
Going to park "a few" A741s here to test my luck...
12.5 x USD$6119 = USD$76,488
That's risk worth taking...
just pulled a 14 billion best share with a s3! "bestshare": 14310183700.74831, Come on Luck! |
|
|
|
I don't think Jamie Dimon really understands how banks work let alone bitcoin.. They create Value from Nothing.... https://youtu.be/oJ5Hq0NDErAThis guy must have lost his private key and is now bitcoins biggest hater... |
|
|
|
There's a communication issue between DE and the main pool. I need to restart DE to correct it. Sorry about that (the hashrate was happening just not being recorded as you can see since DE still managed to find a block).
Okay should be sorted now. I had to take DE offline for a bit there sorry about the inconvenience. All good here miners all flipped back to DE pool. |
|
|
|
Hi. Can you confirm this is the correct file that downloaded from Sourceforge. Because the creation date says 1992! It is also being flagged with Adware.AdLoad.Win32.12441  Basic Properties FileName cryptoGlance-v2.0.2-setup.exe MD5 5e67e8837cf660b4c1240fadce709f0b SHA-1 4bb417adb987f69047f1b7b53cf19aea3d58340b Authentihash 454a61732ef91b3632d3a8455332c16c8723b556a47876a09befc90eb7e16b6f Imphash 884310b1928934402ea6fec1dbd3cf5e File Type Win32 EXE Magic PE32 executable for MS Windows (GUI) Intel 80386 32-bit SSDeep 786432:dvKuL9/rfitIO6mg2pA1MPHuM6Wj/LgecaAp:1K0FratIO6mRafMNjTge1Ap TRiD Inno Setup installer (71.1%) Win32 Executable Delphi generic (9.1%) Windows screen saver (8.4%) Win32 Dynamic Link Library (generic) (4.2%) Win32 Executable (generic) (2.9%) File Size 32.49 MB Creation Time
1992-06-19 22:22:17 |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
