Bitcoin Forum
July 04, 2024, 04:17:58 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1]
1  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: ring signature efficiency on: March 26, 2015, 08:26:01 AM
It looks like Joseph Liu, Victor Wei and Duncan Wong made the same observation in "Linkable Spontaneous Anonymous Group
Signature for Ad Hoc Groups" 2004 https://eprint.iacr.org/2004/027.pdf

The proposed scheme is basically the same as what I propose above, and the Liu, Wei & Wong 2004 publication seems to predate the 2007 Fujisaki & Suzuki "Traceable ring signature" https://eprint.iacr.org/2006/389.pdf cited by cryptonote.

For his master project/thesis, Jesper Borgstrup (https://jesper.borgstrup.dk/about/) worked on integrating ring-signatures to bitmessage to support a decentralized and trustless e-voting system. The thesis is titled "Private, trustless and decentralized message consensus and voting schemes" (https://jesper.borgstrup.dk/2015/01/masters-thesis-private-trustless-decentralized-message-consensus-voting-schemes/) and can be of interest.

In particular he based his work on the 2004 paper you mentioned by Liu, Wei & Wong. He translated it to elliptic curves and implemented in Python to integrate it in PyBitmessage.

We discovered cryptonote later on and were actually surprised to see that they based their work on "traceable ring signature" to make it linkable without mentioning this prior work.

-- NP
2  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitmessage Address Book on: August 04, 2013, 09:13:47 PM
npouillard
BM-2DAC9TpmXQeJyZ9s23oW5kTCPhVPEQFWWX
1npouk6pkBXLHLQaLVqwfxFM2phkVqX7j
PGP: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8826FA5657EF6CA0 (326B FF50 7855 62A4 AC88  55CF 8826 FA56 57EF 6CA0)
3  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Ripple Giveaway! on: April 11, 2013, 10:44:11 PM
rPbpR3oKeMS5SzMZ5gvMdN6RLKMeWhSZ42
4  Local / Français / Re: File des nouveaux venus français on: March 23, 2013, 01:37:20 PM
Salut,

J'ai découvert Bitcoin en 2010 en suivant un tweet de @zooko. J'ai lu l'article et j'ai tout de suite accroché. Je suis régulièrement les évolutions autour de Bitcoin et j'utilise Bitcoin si possible.

Je suis resté cependant assez discret, et je n'ai pas non plus lancé d'activité autour de Bitcoin.

D'ailleur si un modérateur pouvait me marqué comme non-newbie ça serait sympa.
5  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Newbie restrictions on: March 23, 2013, 12:01:09 PM
One more newbie post.
6  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Introduce yourself :) on: March 23, 2013, 11:29:43 AM
I am not a spammer. What about having a captcha when you are still a newbie?
7  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Introduce yourself :) on: March 22, 2013, 06:31:35 PM
Hi. I use and know bitcoin since late 2010.

I don't speak in forums usually, hence this newbie restriction applying...
8  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Wouldn't it be more fair if the bitcoins were shared equally? on: March 21, 2013, 10:45:22 AM
Not only it depends on the meaning of fairness, but it also raises a bunch of questions/challenges on its own:

* How would you implement such a distribution?
* How to claim, through Internet that you are a different person?
* How to do this universally?
* How to avoid identity thief or coercing people to claim their share for you?

People verifying the authenticity of other people therefor get a form of control/power on them. This is against one of the core principle behind Bitcoin, namely decentralization.
9  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Newbie restrictions on: March 20, 2013, 06:55:53 PM
While this is a meaningful restriction, I think it should be made clearer to newbies why they cannot posts. The lack of reply box is not intuitive.
Pages: [1]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!